Practice makes improvement: How adults with autism out-perform others in a naturalistic visual search task

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2259-2268

  Gonzalez, Cleotilde ^a   Martin, Jolie M ^c   Minshew, Nancy J ^b   Behrmann, Marlene ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Autism; Luggage screening; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL SEARCH TASK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS, PERVASIVE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884978653     PISSN: 01623257     EISSN: 15733432     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-013-1772-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ballard, J. C. (1996). Computerized assessment of sustained attention: A review of factors affecting vigilance performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 843-863.
2. Behrmann, M.; Avidan, G.; Leonard, G. L.; Kimchi, R.; Luna, B.; Humphreys, K.; et al. (2006). Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing. Neuropsychologia, 44(1), 110-129.
3. Brosnan, M. J.; Scott, F. J.; Fox, S.; & Pye, J. (2004). Gestalt processing in autism: Failure to process perceptual relationships and the implications for contextual understanding. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 459-469.
4. Brunstein, A.; & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Preparing for novelty with diverse training. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 682-691.
5. Caron, M.-J.; Mottron, L.; & Berthiaume, C. (2006). Cognitive mechanisms, specificity and neural underpinnings of the block design peak in autism. Brain, 129(7), 1789-1802.
6. Clotfelter, C. T.; & Cook, P. J. (1993). The "gambler's fallacy" in lottery play. Management Science, 39(12), 1521-1525.
7. Dakin, S.; & Frith, U. (2005). Vagaries of visual perception in autism. Neuron, 48(3), 497-507.
8. Dutt, V.; & Gonzalez, C. (2012). The role of inertia in modeling decisions from experience with Instance-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(177), 1-12.
9. Gonzalez, C.; Best, B. J.; Healy, A. F.; Bourne, L. E.; Jr, & Kole, J. A. (2010). A cognitive modeling account of simultaneous learning and fatigue effects. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 12(1), 19-32.
10. Gonzalez, C.; & Madhavan, P. (2011). Diversity during training enhances detection of novel stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 342-350.
11. Gowen, E.; & Hamilton, A. (2012). Motor abilities in autism: A review using a computational context. Journal of Autism Development Disorders, Jun 22 (Epub ahead of print).
12. Happe, F. (1999). Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 216-222.
13. Happe, F.; & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 36(1), 5-25.
14. Jarrold, C.; Gilchrist, I. D.; & Bender, A. (2005). Embedded figures detection in autism and typical development: Preliminary evidence of a double dissociation in relationships with visual search. Developmental Science, 8(4), 344-351.
15. Jolliffe, T.; & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the embedded figures test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 527-534.
16. Joseph, R. M.; Keehn, B.; Connolly, C.; Wolfe, J. M.; & Horowitz, T. S. (2009). Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder? Developmental Science, 12(6), 1083-1096.
17. Kaldy, Z.; Kraper, C.; Carter, A. S.; & Blaser, E. (2011). Toddlers with autism spectrum disorder are more successful at visual search than typically developing toddlers. Developmental Science, 1-9.
18. Kana, R. K.; Libero, L. E.; & Moore, M. S. (2011). Disrupted cortical connectivity theory as an explanatory model for autism spectrum disorders. Physics of Life Reviews, 8(4), 410-437.
19. Keita, L.; Mottron, L.; Dawson, M.; & Bertone, A. (2011). Atypical lateral connectivity: A neural basis for altered visuospatial processing in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 70(9), 806-811. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07. 031.
20. Kemner, C.; van der Geest, J. N.; Verbaten, M. H.; & van Engeland, H. (2004). In search of neurophysical markers of pervasive developmental disorders: Smooth pursuit eye movements? Journal of Neural Transmission, 111(12), 1617-1626.
21. Kemner, C.; van Ewijk, L.; van Engeland, H.; & Hooge, I. (2008). Brief report: Eye movements during visual search tasks indicate enhanced stimulus discriminability in subjects with PDD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 553-557.
22. Lacson, F. C.; Gonzalez, C.; & Madhavan, P. (2008). Framing and context effects in visual search training. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 52nd annual meeting (pp. 348-352). New York City: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23. Madhavan, P.; & Gonzalez, C. (2010). The relationship between stimulus-response mapping and the detection of novel stimuli in a simulated luggage screening task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 11(5), 461-473.
24. McCarley, J. S.; Kramer, A. F.; Wickens, C. D.; Vidoni, E. D.; & Boot, W. R. (2004). Visual skills in airport-security screening. American Psychological Society, 15(5), 302-306.
25. Mottron, L.; Dawson, M.; Soulières, I.; Hubert, B.; & Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 27-43.
26. Nevo, I.; & Erev, I. (2012). On surprise, change, and the effect of recent outcomes. Frontiers in Cognitive Science, 3(24).
27. O'Riordan, M.; Plaisted, K. C.; Driver, J.; & Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Superior visual search in autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 719-730.
28. O'Riordan, M. A. (2004). Superior visual search in adults with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 8(3), 229-248.
29. O'Riordan, M.; & Plaisted, K. C. (2001). Enhanced discrimination in autism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(4), 961-979.
30. Parasuraman, R. (1986). Vigilance, monitoring, and search. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1-43). New York: Wiley.
31. Parasuraman, R.; & Davies, D. R. (1976). Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(4), 578-590.
32. Plaisted, K.; O'Riordan, M.; & Baron-Cohen, S. (1998). Enhanced discrimination of novel, highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(5), 765-775.
33. Scherf, K. S.; Luna, B.; Kimchi, R.; Minshew, N.; & Behrmann, M. (2008). Missing the big picture: Impaired development of global shape processing in autism. Autism Research, 1(2), 114-129.
34. Shah, A.; & Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(4), 613-620.
35. Simmons, D. R.; Robertson, A. E.; McKay, L. S.; Toal, E.; McAleer, P.; & Pollick, F. E. (2009). Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49(22), 2705-2739.
36. South, M.; Dana, J.; White, S. E.; & Crowley, M. J. (2010). Failure is not an option: Risk-taking is moderated by anxiety and also by cognitive ability in children and adolescents diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(1), 55-65.
37. White, S. J.; & Saldana, D. (2011). Performance of children with autism on the embedded figures test: A closer look at a popular task. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(11), 1565-1572. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1182-4.
38. Wolfe, J. M.; Horowitz, T. S.; & Kenner, N. M. (2005). Rare items often missed in visual searches: Errors in spotting key targets soar alarmingly if they appear only infrequently during screening. Nature, 435, 439-440.
39. Wolfe, J. M.; Horowitz, T. S.; Van Wert, M. J.; Kenner, N. M.; Place, S. S.; & Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 623-638.