The relationship between stimulus-response mappings and the detection of novel stimuli in a simulated luggage screening task

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 461-473

  Madhavan, P ^a   Gonzalez, C ^b  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

consistent mapping; signal detection; stimulus response mapping; transfer of learning; varied mapping; visual search

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255124718     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639220902866692     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Breznitz, S. 1983. Cry wolf: The psychology of false alarms, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
2. Cooke, NJ, Durso, FT and Schvaneveldt, RW. 1994. Retention of skilled search after nine years. Human Factors, 36(4): 597-605.
3. Cousineau, D and Larochelle, S. 2004. Visual-memory search An integrative perspective. Psychological Research, 69: 77-105.
4. Fisk, AD, Cooper, BP and Hertzog, C. 1995. Understanding performance and learning in consistent memory search: An age-related perspective. Psychology and Aging, 10(2): 255-268.
5. Glass, AL. 1993. The role of generation in recognition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34(3): 255-267.
6. Gonzalez, C, Lerch, JF and Lebiere, C. 2003. Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science, 27(4): 591-635.
7. Hancock, PA and Hart, SG. 2002. Defeating terrorism: What can human factors/ergonomics offer?. Ergonomics in Design, 10(1): 6-16.
8. Healy, AF. 2006. Specificity effects in training and transfer of speeded responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32(3): 534-546.
9. Hertzog, C, Cooper, BP and Fisk, AD. 1996. Aging and individual differences in the development of skilled memory search performance. Psychology and Aging, 11(3): 497-520.
10. Kristofferson, MW. 1975. On the interaction between memory scanning and response set. Memory & Cognition, 3(1): 102-106.
11. Kristofferson, MW. 1977. The effects of practice with one positive set in a memory scanning task can be completely transferred to a different positive set. Memory & Cognition, 5(2): 177-186.
12. Mullennix, JW, Sawusch, JR and Garrison, FF. 1992. Automaticity and the detection of speech. Memory & Cognition, 20(1): 40-50.
13. Schmidt, RA and Bjork, RA. 1992. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3: 207-217.
14. Schmitter-Edgecombe, M and Rogers, WA. 1997. Automatic process development following severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology, 11(2): 296-308.
15. Schneider, W and Shiffrin, RM. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1): 1-66.
16. Shiffrin, RM and Schneider, W. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2): 127-190.
17. Smith, JD. 2005a. Visual search and the collapse of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4): 443-460.
18. Smith, JD. 2005b. Specific-token effects in screening tasks: Possible implications for aviation security. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(6): 1171-1185.
19. Strayer, DL and Kramer, AF. 1994. Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20(2): 318-341.