A cognitive modeling account of simultaneous learning and fatigue effects

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-32

  Gonzalez, Cleotilde ^a   Best, Brad ^a   Healy, Alice F ^b   Kole, James A ^b   Bourne, Lyle E ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

ACT R; Computational model; Fatigue; Learning; Prolonged work; Training

Indexed keywords

ACT-R; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; FATIGUE; LEARNING; PROLONGED WORK; TRAINING;

ACCURACY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COGNITION; FATIGUE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; JOB STRESS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING STYLE; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL TASK; MOTIVATION; NEUROMODULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; RECALL; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SKILL RETENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 77958471270     PISSN: 13890417     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 2004, 111:1036-1060.
2. Anderson J.R., Fincham J.M., Douglass S. Practice and retention: A unifying analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1999, 25:1120-1136.
3. Anderson J.R., Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Anderson J.R., Reder L.M., Lebiere C. Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 30:221-256.
5. Ballard J.C. Computerized assessment of sustained attention: A review of factors affecting vigilance performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology 1996, 18:843-863.
6. Bartlett M.S. Approximate confidence intervals. Biometrika 1953, 40:12-19.
7. Belavkin R.V. Annual report: Studying the role of emotions in problem solving with cognitive architectures (Technical Report) 1999, School of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
8. Belavkin R.V. The role of emotion in problem solving. Proceedings of the AISB '01 symposium on emotion, cognition, and affective computing 2001, 49-57. Heslington, York, England. C. Johnson (Ed.).
9. Buck-Gengler, C. J., Raymond, W. D., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (2007). Modeling data entry in IMPRINT. In Proceedings of the sixteenth conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation (pp. 205-206). Orlando, FL: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.
10. Chuderski A., Stettner Z., Orzechowski J. Modeling individual differences in working memory search task. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on cognitive modeling 2006, 74-79. Trieste, Italy. D. Fum, F.D. Missier, A. Stocco (Eds.).
11. Easterbrook J.A. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review 1959, 66:183-201.
12. Eysenck M.V. Attention and arousal, cognition and performance 1982, Springer, New York.
13. Fu W.T., Anderson J.R. From recurrent choice to skill learning: A reinforcement-learning model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135(2):184-206.
14. Fu, W., Gonzalez, C., Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2006). Building predictive models of skill acquisition in a data entry task. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (HFES 50th annual meeting) (pp. 1122-1126). Santa Monica, CA.
15. Gawron V.J., French J., Funke D. An overview of fatigue. Stress, workload, and fatigue 2001, 581-595. L. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. P.A. Hancock, P.A. Desmond (Eds.).
16. Gonzalez, C., Fu, W., Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2006). ACT-R models of training data entry skills. In Proceedings of the conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation (BRIMS 2006) (pp. 101-109). Baltimore, MD.
17. Gunzelmann G., Byrne M., Gluck K.A., Moore R.L. Using computational cognitive modeling to predict dual-task performance with sleep deprivation. Human Factors 2009, 51(2):251-260.
18. Gunzelmann G., Gluck K.A. An integrative approach to understanding and predicting the consequences of fatigue on cognitive performance. Cognitive Technology 2009, 14:14-25.
19. Gunzelmann G., Gluck K.A., Price S., Dinges D.F., O'Connor R.M., van Dongen H.P.A. Decreased arousal as a result of sleep deprivation. Integrated models of cognitive systems 2007, 243-253. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. W.D. Gray (Ed.).
20. Gunzelmann G., Gluck K.A., Van Dongen H.P.A., O'Connor R.M., Dinges D.F. A neurobehaviorally inspired ACT-R model of sleep deprivation: Decreased performance in psychomotor vigilance. Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual meeting of the cognitive science society 2005, 857-862. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. B.G. Bara, L. Barsalou, M. Bucciarellli (Eds.).
21. Gunzelmann G., Gross J.B., Gluck K.A., Dinges D.F. Sleep deprivation and sustained attention performance: Integrating mathematical and cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:880-910.
22. Healy A.F., Kole J.A., Buck-Gengler C.J., Bourne L.E. Effects of prolonged work on data entry speed and accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2004, 10:188-199.
23. Hoffman R.R., Sherrick M.F., Warm J.S. Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember 1998, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
24. Jongman, G. M. G. (1998). How to fatigue ACT-R? In Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 52-57). Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
25. Kole J.A., Healy A.F., Bourne L.E. Cognitive complications moderate the speed-accuracy tradeoff in data entry: A cognitive antidote to inhibition. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:917-937.
26. Lewis R.L. The surprising nature of working memory in language comprehension: Insights from cognitive architectures and psycholinguistics. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on cognitive modeling 2006, 16-17. Trieste, Italy. D. Fum, F.D. Missier, A. Stocco (Eds.).
27. Lovett M.C., Reder L.M., Lebiere C. Modeling working memory in a unified architecture: An ACT-R perspective. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control 1999, 135-182. Cambridge University Press, New York. A. Miyake, P. Shah (Eds.).
28. MacLeod C., Mathews A. Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 1988, 40:653-670.
29. Mackworth N.H. The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 17:203-325.
30. Pachella R.G. The interpretation of reaction time in human information processing research. Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition 1974, 41-82. Halstead, New York. B. Kantowitz (Ed.).
31. Parasuraman R. Vigilance, monitoring, and search. Cognitive processes and performance 1986, Vol. 2:1-43. Wiley, New York. K. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. Thomas (Eds.).
32. Proctor R.W., Dutta A. Skill acquisition and human performance 1995, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Raymond, W. D., Buck-Gengler, C. J., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2007). Predicting differences in individual learning and performance in a motor skill task. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Convention of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association Meeting, Denver, CO.
34. Raymond, W. D., Fornberg, B., Buck-Gengler, C. J., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2008). Matlab optimization of an IMPRINT model of human behavior. In Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation (pp. 26-34). Orlando, FL: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.
35. Ritter F.E., Reifers A., Klein L., Schoelles M.J. Lessons from defining theories of stress. Integrated models of cognitive systems 2007, 254-262. Oxford University Press, New York. W.D. Gray (Ed.).
36. Ritter, F. E., Reifers, A., Klein, L. C., Quigley, K., & Schoelles, M. J. (2004). Using cognitive modeling to study behavior moderators: Pre-task appraisal and anxiety. In Proceedings of the 48th meeting of The Human Factors And Ergonomics Society (pp. 2121-2125). New Orleans: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
37. Ritter F.E., Schooler L.J. The learning curve. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 2001, 8602-8605. Pergamon, Amsterdam. N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (Eds.).
38. Smit A.S., Eling P.A.T.M., Coenen A.M.L. Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychologica 2004, 115:35-42.
39. Sternberg S. High-speed scanning in human memory. Science 1966, 153:652-654.
40. Taatgen N.A., Anderson J.R. Why do children learn to say "broke?" A model of learning the past tense without feedback. Cognition 2002, 86:123-155.
41. Taatgen N.A., Lee F.J. Production compilation: A simple mechanism to model complex skill acquisition. Human Factors 2003, 45:61-76.
42. van Rijn H., van Sumeren M., van der Mass H.L.J. Modeling development transitions on the balance scale task. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:227-257.
43. Veksler, B. Z., Gray, W. D., & Schoelles, M. J. (2007). From 1000ms to 650ms: Why interleaving, soft constraints, and milliseconds matter. In Proceedings of ICCM- 2007 eighth international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 127-132). Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press.
44. Wickens, C. D. (1984). The multiple resources model of human performance: Implications for display design. In Proceedings of the AGARD/NATO Report. Williamsburg, VA: AGARD/NATO.