Preparing for novelty with diverse training

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 682-691

  Brunstein, Angela ^a   Gonzalez, Cleotilde ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VISION;

EID: 80053107453     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1739     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-403.
2. Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1999). Practice and retention: A unifying analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1120-1136.
3. Ashworth, A. R. S., & Dror, I. E. (2000). Object identification as a function of discriminability and learning presentations: The effect of stimulus similarity and canonical frame alignment on aircraft identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 148-157.
4. Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P., & Cowan, W. B. (1996). Distractor heterogeneity versus linear separability in color search. Perception, 25, 1281-1293.
5. Brand, J. (1971). Classification without identification in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 178-186.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In K. A. Ericson, N. Charness, & P. J. Feltovitch (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 121-130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cohen, A. L., Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2001). Category variability, exemplar similarity, and perceptual classification. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1165-1175.
8. Corneille, O., Goldstone, R. L., Queller, S., & Potter, T. (2006). Asymmetries in categorization, perceptual discrimination, and visual search for reference and nonreference exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 34, 556-567.
9. Daoutis, C. A., Pilling, M., & Davies, I. R. L. (2006). Categorical effects in visual search for colour. Visual Cognition, 14, 217-240.
10. Doane, S. M., Sohn, Y. W., & Schreiber, B. (1999). The Role of Processing Strategies in the Acquisition and Transfer of a Cognitive Skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1390-1410.
11. Egeth, H., Jonides, J., & Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multi-element displays. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 674-698.
12. Fiore, S. M., Scielzo, S., & Jentsch, F. (2004). Stimulus competition during preceptual learning: Training and aptitude consideration in the x-ray security screening process. Cognitive Technology, 9, 34-39.
13. Flannagan, M. J., Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 241-256.
14. Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 234-257.
15. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a 'Greeble' expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
16. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 431-446.
17. Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. (1998). Training 'Greeble' experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38, 2401-2428.
18. Gleitman, H., & Jonides, J. (1976). The cost of categorization in visual search: Incomplete processing of targets and field items. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 281-288.
19. Gonzalez, C. (2004). Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: Effects of time constraints and cognitive abilities. Human Factors, 46, 449-460.
20. Gonzalez, C. (2005). Task workload and cognitive abilities in dynamic decision making. Human Factors, 47, 92-101.
21. Healy, A. F., Wohldmann, E. L., Parker, J. T., & Bourne, L. E. Jr., (2005). Skill training, retention, and transfer: The effects of a concurrent secondary task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1457-1471.
22. Healy, A. F., Wohldmann, E. L., Sutton, E. M., & Bourne, L. E. Jr., (2006). Specificity effects in training and transfer of speeded responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 534-546.
23. Hahn, U., Bailey, T.M., & Elvin, L.B.C. (2005). Effects of category diversity on learning, memory, and generalization. Memory & Cognition, 33, 289-302.
24. Homa, D., & Vosburgh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 322-330.
25. Ingling, N. W. (1972). Categorization: A mechanism for rapid information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 239-243.
26. Jonides, J., & Gleitman, H. (1972). A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as a letter or a digit. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 456-460.
27. Jonides, J., & Gleitman, H. (1976). The benefits of categorization in visual search: Target location without identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 289-298.
28. Logan, G. (1988). Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
29. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problem of flexibility, fluency, and speed-acuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psyschological Review, 89, 483-506.
30. Madhavan, P., & Gonzalez, C. (2007). Differential base rate training influences detection of novel targets in a complex visual inspection task. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 51st annual meeting (pp. 392-396). Baltimore, MD: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
31. Madhavan, P., & Gonzalez, C. (2009). The relationship between stimulus-response mappings and the detection of novel stimuli in a simulated luggage screening task. Conditionally accepted for Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1464-536X.
32. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2005). Cognitive anchoring on self-generated decisions reduces operator reliance on automated diagnostic aids. Human Factors, 47, 332-341.
33. McCarley, J. S., & Carruth, D. W. (2004). Oculomotor scanning and target recognition luggage x-ray screening. Cognitive Technology, 9, 26-29.
34. McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., Wickens, C. D., Vidoni, E. D., & Boot, W. R. (2004). Visual skills in airport-security screening. American Psychological Society, 15, 302-306.
35. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
36. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Pellegrino, J. W., Doane, S. M., Fischer, S. C., & Alderton, D. (1991). Stimulus complexity effects in visual comparisons: The effects of practice and learning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 781-791.
38. Peterson, M. J., Meagher, R. B., Jr., Chait, H., & Gillie, S. (1973). The abstraction and generalization of dot patterns. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 378-398.
39. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
40. Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortney (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Roediger, H. L., Gallo, D. A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319-332.
42. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left lateralized face-like electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science, 13, 250-257.
43. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
44. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
45. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
46. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., Gent, L. C., & Washburn, D. A. (2005). Visual search and the collapse of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 443-460.
48. Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., Washburn, D. A., & Taglialatela, L. A. (2005). Specific-token effects in screening tasks: Possible implications for aviation security. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1171-1185.
49. Sweller, J. (1980). Transfer effects in a problem solving context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 233-239.
50. Washburn, D. A., Taglialatela, L. A., Rice, P. R., & Smith, J. D. (2004). Individual differences in sustained attention and threat detection. Cognitive Technology, 9, 30-33.
51. Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I., & O'Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 34-49.
52. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., van Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S., & Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 623-638.