Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1256-1264

  Lee, Angela W C ^a   Rajagopal, Vijayaraghavan ^a   Babarenda Gamage, Thiranja P ^a   Doyle, Anthony J ^b,c   Nielsen, Poul M F ^a,c   Nash, Martyn P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Breast biomechanical models; Breast image registration; Finite element modelling; Multimodal breast image registration

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR POSTERIORS; BIO-MECHANICAL MODELS; COMPRESSIVE DEFORMATIONS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING; MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES; MR IMAGE REGISTRATIONS; MULTI-MODAL; REGISTRATION TECHNIQUES;

BIOMECHANICS; DEFORMATION; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE MATCHING; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; X RAY SCREENS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGING PHANTOM; MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; NIPPLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHYSICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST BIOMECHANICAL MODELS; BREAST IMAGE REGISTRATION; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING; MULTIMODAL BREAST IMAGE REGISTRATION;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84884977668     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aljabar P., Heckemann R., Hammers A., Hajnal J., Rueckert D. Multi-atlas based segmentation pf brain images: atlas selection and its effects on accuracy. NeuroImage 2009, 46:726-738.
2. Azar F.S., Metaxas D.N., Schnall M.D. A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations. Acad. Radiol. 2001, 8:965-975.
3. Babalola K.O., Patenaude B., Aljabar P., Schnabel J., Kennedy D., Crum W., Smith S., Cootes T., Jenkinson M., Rueckert D. An evaluation of four automatic methods of segmenting the subcortical structures in the brain. NeuroImage 2009, 47:1435-1447.
4. Behrenbruch C.P., Marias K., Armitage P.A., Yam M., Moore N., English R.E., Clarke P.J., Brady M. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Med. Image Anal. 2003, 7:311-340.
5. Behrenbruch C.P., Marias K., Armitage P.A., Yam M., Moore N.R., English R.E., Clarke P.J., Leong F.J., Brady J.M. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Br. J. Radiol. 2004, 77:S201-S208.
6. Bick U., Diekmann F. Digital Mammography 2010, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
7. Bushberg J.T., Seibert J.A., Leidholdt J.E.M., Boone J. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging 2002, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, London.
8. Chung J.H., Rajagopal V., Laursen T.A., Nielsen P.M., Nash M.P. Frictional contact mechanics methods for soft materials: application to tracking breast cancers. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:69-77.
9. Chung J.H., Rajagopal V., Nielsen P.M., Nash M.P. Modelling mammographic compression of the breast. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2008, 5242:758-765.
10. de Parades E.S. Atlas of Mammography 2007, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
11. Gefen A., Dilmoney B. Mechanics of the normal woman's breast. Technol. Health Care 2007, 15:259-271.
12. Han L., Hipwell J., Tanner C., Taylor Z., Mertzanidou T., Cardoso J., Ourselin S., Hawkes D. Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012, 57:455-472.
13. Hipwell J.H., Tanner C., Crum W.R., Schnabel J.A., Hawkes D.J. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2007, 26:1190-1200.
14. Hopp T., Baltzer P., Dietzel M., Kaiser W., Ruiter N. 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2011, 7:339-348.
15. Hopp T., Dietzel M., Baltzer P.A., Kreisel P., Kaiser W.A., Gemmeke H., Ruiter N.V. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization. Med. Image Anal. 2013, 17:209-218.
16. Hubbell J.H., Seltzer S.M. Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 2004, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
17. Iglesias J.E., Karssemeijer N. Robust initial detection of landmarks in film-screen mammograms using multiple FFDM atlases. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2009, 28:1815-1824.
18. Ikeda D.M. Breast Imaging 2011, Elsevier/Mosby, Philadelphia, PA.
19. Kinoshita S.K., Azevedo-Marques P.M., Pereira R.R., Rodrigues J.A.H., Rangayyan R.M. Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms. J. Digit. Imag. 2008, 21:37-49.
20. Kita Y., Tohno E., Highnam R., Brady M. A CAD system for the 3D location of lesions in mammograms. Med. Image. Anal. 2002, 6:267-273.
21. Lee, A.W.C., 2011. Breast Image Fusion Using Biomechanics. PhD Thesis. The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
22. Lee A.W.C., Rajagopal V., Chung J.H., Bier P., Nielsen P.M.F., Nash M.P. Biomechanical modelling for breast image registration. SPIE Med. Imag. 2008, 6918:69180U.
23. Lee, A.W.C., Rajagopal, V., Reynolds, H.M., Doyle, A., Nielsen, P.M.F., Nash, M.P., 2011. Breast X-ray and MR image fusion using finite element modelling. In: Tanner, C., Schnabel, J.A., Karssemeijer, N., Nielsen, M., Giger, M., Hawkes, D. (Eds.), Workshop on Breast Image Analysis (MICCAI 2011 Workshop), Toronto, Canada, pp. 63-71.
24. Malur S., Wurdinger S., Moritz A., Michels W., Schneider A. Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3:55-60.
25. Marti R., Zwiggelaar R., Rubin C.M.E., Denton E.R.E. 2D-3D correspondence in mammography. Cybern. Syst. 2004, 35:85-105.
26. Marti R., Raba D., Oliver A., Zwiggelaar R. Mammographic registration: proposal and evaluation of a new approach. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2006, 4046:213-220.
27. Mertzanidou T., Hipwell J., Cardoso M.J., Zhang X., Tanner C., Ourselin S., Bick U., Huisman H., Karssemeijer N., Hawkes D. MRI to X-ray mammography using a volume-preserving affine transformation. Med. Image Anal. 2012, 16:966-975.
28. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histogram. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1979, 9:62-66.
29. Pinto Pereira S.M., Hipwell J.H., McCormack V.A., Tanner C., Moss S.M., Wilkinson L.S., Khoo L.A., Pagliari C., Skippage P.L., Kliger C.J., Hawkes D.J., Silva I.M. Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic X-ray mammograms: evaluation and comparison to radiologists' accuracy. Med. Phys. 2010, 37:4530-4539.
30. Rajagopal V., Chung J.H., Bullivant D., Nielsen P.M.F., Nash M.P. Determining the finite elasticity reference state from a loaded configuration. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2007, 72:1434-1451.
31. Rajagopal, V., Boyes, R., Azhar, M., Babarenda Gamage, T.P., Nielsen, P.M.F., Nash, M.P., 2011. Towards a completely automated clinical workflow for breast image analysis using patient-specific biomechanical models. In: Tanner, C., Schnabel, J.A., Karssemeijer, N., Nielsen, M., Giger, M., Hawkes, D. (Eds.), Workshop on Breast Image Analysis (MICCAI 2011 Workshop), Toronto Canada, pp. 121-128.
32. Reynolds H.M., Puthran J., Doyle A., Jones W., Nielsen P.M., Nash M.P., Rajagopal V. Mapping breast cancer between clinical X-ray and MR images. Computational Biomechanics for Medicine: Soft Tissues and the Musculoskeletal System 2011, 81-90. Springer. A. Wittek, P.M.F. Nielsen, K. Miller (Eds.).
33. Robinson D.M., Scrimger J.W. Monoenergetic approximately of a polyenergetic beam: a theoretical approach. Br. J. Radiol. 1991, 64:452-454.
34. Rueckert D., Sonoda L.I., Hayes C., Hill D.L.G., Leach M.O., Hawkes D.J. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1999, 18:712-721.
35. Ruiter N.V., Stotzka R., Muller T.O., Gemmeke H., Reichenbach J.R., Kaiser W.A. Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2006, 53:204-211.
36. Samani A., Zubovits J., Plewes D. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52:1565-1576.
37. Shih T.C., Chen J.H., Liu D., Nie K., Sun L., Lin M., Chang D., Nalcioglu O., Su M.Y. Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images. Phys. Med. Biol. 2010, 55:4153-4168.
38. Tanner C., Schnabel J.A., Hill D.L., Hawkes D.J., Leach M.O., Hose D.R. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. Med. Phys. 2006, 33:1758-1769.
39. Tanner C., Hipwell J.H., Hawkes D.J. Statistical deformation models of breast compressions from biomechanical simulations. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2008, 5116:426-432.
40. Tanner C., Guarino S., White M., Douek M., Hall-Craggs M.A., Hawkes D.J. Anisotropic behaviour of breast tissue for large compressions. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag.: From Nano Macro 2009, 1223-1226.
41. Tanner C., Hipwell J.H., Hawkes D.J., Szekely G. Breast shapes on real and simulated mammograms. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2010, 6136:540-547.
42. Tanner C., White M., Guarino S., Hall-Craggs M.A., Douek M., Hawkes D.J. Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations. Med. Phys. 2011, 38:682-690.
43. van Engeland S., Karssemeijer T.P.N. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. Med. Phys. 2006, 33:3203-3212.
44. Wessel C., Schnabel J.A., Brady M. A biomechanical model of spiculated tumours under mammographic compressions. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2010, 2010:712-715.
45. Yin H.M., Sun L.Z., Wang G., Yamada T., Wang J., Vannier M.W. ImageParser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images. Biomed. Eng. OnLine 2004, 3:31.
46. Zhang Y., Sarkar S., Qiu Y., Goldgof D.B., Li L. 3D finite element modeling of nonrigid breast deformation for feature registration in X-ray and MR Images. IEEE Workshop Appl. Comput. Vis. 2007, 38.
47. Zhou C., Chan H.-P., Paramagul C., Roubidoux M.A., Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L.M., Petrickb N. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis. Med. Phys. 2004, 31:2871-2882.