Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 77, Issue SPEC. ISS. 2, 2004, Pages

  Behrenbruch, C P ^a,c,e   Marias, K ^a,b   Armitage, P A ^a   Yam, M ^a   Moore, N R ^c   English, R E ^d   Clarke, P J ^d   Leong, F J ^e   Brady, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d CHURCHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e Mirada Solutions Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 14044278192     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66587930     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Behrenbruch CP, Marias K, Armitage PA, Yam M, Moore A, English RE, et al. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Medical Image Analysis 2003;7:311-40.
2. Behrenbruch CP, Marias K, Armitage PA, Brady JM, Clarke J, Moore N. The generation of simulated mammograms from contrast-enhanced MRI for surgical planning and postoperative assessment. In: Proceedings of IWDM (the International Workshop in Digital Mammography), Toronto, Canada: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
3. Kita Y, Highnam R, Brady M. Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using a simulation of breast deformation. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1998:700-7.
4. Yam M, Brady JM, Highnam RP, English RE, Kita Y. Reconstructing microcalcification clusters in 3-D using a parameterized breast compression model. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Paris, 1999.
5. Kavanagh AM, Mitchell H, Giles GG. Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. Lancet 2000;355:270-4.
6. Leung W, Goldberg F, Zee B, Sterns E. Mammographic density in women on postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Surgery 1997;122:669-73; discussion 673-4.
7. Litherland JC, Evans AJ, Wilson AR. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on recall rate in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Clin Radiol 1997;52: 276-9.
8. Warren RML, Hayes C, the Advisory Group of the UK study of MRI screening for breast cancer - MARIBS. Localization of breast lesions shown only on MRI - a review for the UK study of MRI screening for breast cancer. Br J Radiol 2000;73:123-32.
9. Marias K, Behrenbruch CP, Brady JM, Parbhoo S, Seifalian AM. Multi-scale landmark selection for improved registration of temporal mammograms. In: Proceedings of IWDM (International Workshop in Digital Mammography), Toronto, Canada: Elsevier, 2000.
10. Lanyi M. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast calcifications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
11. Wolfe JN. Xenoradiography of the breast. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas Publishing, 1982.
12. Rankin SC. MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 2000;73:806-18.