Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 209-218

  Hopp, T ^a   Dietzel, M ^b   Baltzer, P A ^c   Kreisel, P ^d   Kaiser, W A ^d   Gemmeke, H ^a   Ruiter, N V ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanical models; Breast imaging; Finite element method; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multimodal registration

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED REGISTRATION; BIO-MECHANICAL MODELS; BREAST IMAGING; MULTIMODAL DIAGNOSIS; MULTIMODAL REGISTRATION; REGISTRATION ACCURACY; REGISTRATION METHODS; TARGET REGISTRATION ERRORS;

AUTOMATION; BIOMECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION; X RAY SCREENS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; AUTOMATION; BIOMECHANICS; BREAST; BREAST LESION; BREAST LESION DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM; COMPRESSION; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE REGISTRATION; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84883881498     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2011-2012 2011, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta.
2. Baltzer P., Dietzel M., Vag T., Berger S., Freiberg C., Herzog A., Gajda M., Camara O., Kaiser W. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?. RoFo: Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2009, 182:254-260.
3. Behrenbruch C.P., Marias K., Armitage P.A., Yam M., Moore N., English R.E., Clarke J., Brady M. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Med. Image Anal. 2003, 7:311-340.
4. Chan T., Vese L. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 2001, 10:266-277.
5. Chung J.H., Rajagopal V., Nielsen P.M.F., Nash M.P. A biomechanical model of mammographic compressions. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2008, 7:43-52.
6. Dassault SystFmes, 2009. Abaqus Theory Manual, V 6.9.
7. Dassault SystFmes, 2011. Abaqus 6.11 Online Documentation.
8. DeMartini W., Lehman C. A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Top. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2008, 19:143-150.
9. Dietzel M., Hopp T., Ruiter N., Zoubi R., Runnebaum I.B., Kaiser W.A., Baltzer P.A. Fusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography at 3.0T with X-ray mammograms: pilot study evaluation using dedicated semi-automatic registration software. EJR 2011, 79:98-102.
10. Fang, Q., Boas, D., 2009. Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2009, pp. 1142-1145.
11. Ferrant, M., Warfield, S.K., Nabavi, A., Jolesz, F.A., Kikinis, R., 2001. Registration of 3D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite element biomechanical model. In: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, pp. 1384-1397.
12. Fischer T., Bick U., Thomas A. Mammographie-screening in deutschland. Visions J. 2007, 15:62-67.
13. Hall M., Frank E., Holmes G., Pfahringer B., Reutemann P., Witten I.H. The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 2009, 11:10-18.
14. Hopp, T., 2012. Multimodal Registration of X-Ray Mammograms with 3D Volume Datasets. Ph.D. thesis, University of Mannheim.
15. Hopp T., Baltzer P., Dietzel M., Kaiser W., Ruiter N. 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2012, 7:339-348.
16. Hopp, T., Bonn, J., Ruiter, N.V., Sak, M., Duric, N., 2011. 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with speed of sound images: evaluation and visualization. In: Proceedings SPIE Medical Imaging, p. 79680L.
17. Hopp, T., Ruiter, N., 2011. Configurable framework for automatic multimodal 2D/3D registration of volume datasets with X-ray mammograms. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Breast Image Analysis in Conjunction with MICCAI 2011, pp. 145-152.
18. Hopp T., Ruiter N. 2D/3D registration for localization of mammographically depicted lesions in breast MRI. Breast Imaging 2012, 627-634. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. A. Maidment, P. Bakic, S. Gavenonis (Eds.).
19. Hopp, T., Ruiter, N., M.Dietzel, Kaiser, W., Baltzer, P., 2012b. Entwicklung und Test einer Open Source-basierten Software Infrastruktur fnr die strukturierte Befundung und Dokumentation im Rahmen multimodaler, multizentrischer radiologischer Studien. In: RöFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr S1, Abstracts 93. Deutscher Röntgenkongress.
20. Houssami N., Ciatto S., Macaskill P., Lord S.J., Warren R.M., Dixon J.M., Irwig L. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26:3248-3258.
21. Kaiser W.A., Fischer H., Vagner J., Selig M. Robotic system for biopsy and therapy of breast lesions in a high-field whole-body magnetic resonance tomography unit. Invest. Radiol. 2000, 35:513-519.
22. Kaiser W.A., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989, 170:681-686.
23. Krouskop T.A., Wheeler T.M., Kallel F., Garra B.S., Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imag. 1998, 20:260-274.
24. Lee, A.W.C., Rajagopal, V., Reynolds, H.M., Doyle, A., Nielsen, P.M., Nash, M.P., 2011. Breast X-ray and MR image fusion using finite element modeling. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Breast Image Analysis in Conjunction with MICCAI 2011, pp. 129-136.
25. Lim J.S. Two-dimensional Signal and Image Processing 1990, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
26. Martf R., Zwiggelaar R., Rubin C.M.E., Denton E.R.E. Two-dimensional - three-dimensional correspondence in mammography. Int. J. Cybern. Syst. 2004, 35:85-105.
27. Mertzanidou T., Hipwell J., Cardoso M.J., Zhang X., Tanner C., Ourselin S., Bick U., Huisman H., Karssemeijer N., Hawkes D. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation. Med. Image Anal. 2012, 16:966-975.
28. Mertzanidou, T., Hipwell, J., Han, L., Huisman, H., Karssemaijer, N., Hawkes, D., 2011. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using an ellipsoidal breast model and biomechanically simulated compressions. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Breast Image Analysis in Conjunction with MICCAI 2011, pp. 161-168.
29. Mertzanidou, T., Hipwell, J.H., Cardoso, M.J., Tanner, C., Ourselin, S., Hawkes, D.J., 2010. X-ray mammography - MRI registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation and an EM-MRF for breast tissue classification. In: Proceedings Digital Mammography/IWDM 2010, pp. 23-30.
30. Pisano E.D., Hendrick R.E., Yaffe M.J., Baum J.K., Acharyya S., Cormack J.B., Hanna L.A., Conant E.F., Fajardo L.L., Bassett L.W., D'Orsi C.J., Jong R.A., Rebner M., Tosteson A.N.A., Gatsonis C.A. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST1. Radiology 2008, 246:376-383.
31. Quinlan J.R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning 1993, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
32. Rajagopal, V., Chung, J.H., Highnam, R.P., Warren, R., Nielsen, P.M., Nash, M.P., 2010. Mapping microcalcifications between 2D mammograms and 3D MRI using a biomechanical model of the breast. In: Computational Biomechanics for Medicine, pp. 17-28.
33. Reynolds, H.M., Puthran, J., Doyle, A., Jones, W., Nielsen, P.M.F., Nash, M.P., Rajagopal, V., 2011. Mapping breast cancer between clinical X-ray and MR images. In: Computational Biomechanics for Medicine, pp. 81-90.
34. Ruiter N.V., Stotzka R., Mueller T.O., Gemmeke H., Reichenbach J.R., Kaiser W.A. Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2006, 53:204-211.
35. Samani A., Zubovits J., Plewes D. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples. Phys. Med. Bio. 2007, 52:1565.
36. Schulz-Wendtland R., FuchsjSger M., Wacker T., Hermann K.P. Digital mammography: an update. EJR 2009, 72:258-265.
37. Si, H., 2006. TetGen: A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and Three-Dimensional Delauny Triangulator, Version 1.4. User's Manual.
38. Sivaramakrishna R., Gordon R. Detection of breast cancer at a smaller size can reduce the likelihood of metastatic spread: a quantitative analysis. Acad. Radiol. 1997, 4:8-12.
39. Tanner, C., White, M., Guarino, S., Hall-Craggs, M., Douek, M., Hawkes, D., 2009. Anisotropic behaviour of breast tissue for large compressions. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009 (ISBI '09), pp. 1223-1226.
40. Warner E., Messersmith H., Causer P., Eisen A., Shumak R., Plewes D. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008, 148:671-679.
41. Wellman, P.S., Howe, R.D., Dalton, E., Kern, K.A., 1999. Breast Tissue Stiffness in Compression is Correlated to Histological Diagnosis. Technical Report, Harvard BioRobotics Laboratory.
42. Zienkiewidz O., Taylor R. The Finite Element Method 2000, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, vol. 1. 5th ed.
43. Zienkiewidz O., Taylor R. The Finite Element Method 2000, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, vol. 2. 5th ed.