Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views

Medical Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 3203-3212

  Van Engeland, Saskia ^a   Timp, Sheila ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer Aided Detection (CAD); Mammography; Masses; Multiple view

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DISEASES; MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; GRAY SCALE CORRELATIONS; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MASSES; MEDIOLATERAL OBLIQUES; MULTIPLE VIEWS; REGIONS OF INTEREST;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GRAY SCALE ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METHODOLOGY; NIPPLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 33748304455     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.2230359     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. T. Freer and M. Ulissey, "Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center," Radiology 220, 781-786 (2001).
2. T. Cupples, J. Cunningham, and J. Reynolds, "Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program," Am. J. Roentgenol. 185, 944-950 (2005).
3. L. Bassett, D. Bunnell, R. Jahanshahi, R. Gold, R. Arndt, and J. Linsman, "Breast cancer detection: One versus two views," Radiology 165, 95-97 (1987).
4. E. Thurfjell, "Mammography screening: One versus two views and independent double reading," Acta Radiol. 35, 345-350 (1994).
5. R. Blanks, M. Wallis, and R. Given-Wilson, "Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening Ln a study of two versus one view mammography," J. Med. Screen 6, 152-158 (1999).
6. S. Timp, S. van Engeland, and N. Karssemeijer, "A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs," Med. Phys. 32, 2629-2638 (2005).
7. S. Sanjay-Gopal, H. Chan, T. Wilson, M. Helvie, N. Petrick, and B. Sahiner, "A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms," Med. Phys. 26, 2669-2679 (1999).
8. N. Karssemeijer and G. te Brake, "Combining single view features and asymmetry for detection of mass lesions," in Digital Mammography, edited by N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, J. Hendriks, and L. van Erning (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998), pp. 95-102.
9. T. Lau and W. Bischof, "Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach," Comput. Biomed. Res. 24, 273-295 (1991).
10. R. Highnam, Y. Kita, M. Brady, B. Shepstone, and R. English, "Determining correspondence between views," in Digital Mammography (Kluwer Academic, Nijmegen, 1998), pp. 111-118.
11. W. Good, B. Zheng, Y. Chang, X. Wang, G. Maitz, and D. Gur, "Multi-image CAD employing features derived from ipsilateral mammographic views," in Medical Imaging: Image Processing, edited by K. Hanson, Proceedings of SPIE, 1999, Vol. 3661, pp. 474-485.
12. S. Paquerault, N. Petrick, H. Chan, B. Sahiner, and M. Helvie, "Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: Fusion of two-view information," Med. Phys. 29, 238-247 (2002).
13. S. van Engeland and N. Karssemeijer, "Matching breast lesions in multiple mammographic views," in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted intervention, edited by W. Niessen and M. Viergever, Springer, LNCS, 2001, Vol. 2208, pp. 1172-1173.
14. B. Zheng, D. Chough, P. Ronald, C. Cohen, C. M. Hakim, G. Abrams, M. A. Ganott, L. Wallace, R. Shah, J. H. Sumkin, and D. Gur, "Actual versus intended use of CAD systems in the clinical environment," in Medical Imaging: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, edited by Y. Jiang and M. P. Eckstein, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 6146 (SPIE, Bellingham, 2006).
15. R. M. Nishikawa, A. Edwards, R. Schmidt, J. Papaioannou, and M. Linver, "Can radiologists recognize that a computer has identified cancers that they have overlooked?," in Medical Imaging: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, edited by Y. Jiang and M. P. Eckstein, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 6146 (SPIE, Bellingham, 2006).
16. N. Karssemeijer, "Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms," Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 365-378 (1998).
17. N. Karssemeijer and G. te Brake, "Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15, 611-619 (1996).
18. G. te Brake and N. Karssemeijer, "Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 628-639 (1999).
19. S. Timp and N. Karssemeijer, "A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography," Med. Phys. 31, 958-971 (2004).
20. S. van Engeland, N. Karssemeijer, and J. Hendriks, "Using information from two mammographic views to improve computer-aided detection of mass lesions," in 6th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, edited by H. Peitgen (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002), pp. 377-381.
21. P. Filev, L. Hadjiiski, B. Sahiner, H. Chan, and M. Helvie, "Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms," Med. Phys. 32, 515-529 (2005).
22. R. Jonker and A. Volgenant, "A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems," Computing 38, 325-340 (1987).
23. S. van Engeland and N. Karssemeijer, "Regrouping initial CAD mass detections to facilitate classification of suspicious regions in mammography," in Medical Imaging: Image Processing, edited by J. Fitzpatrick and J. Reinhardt, Proceedings of SPIE, 2005, Vol. 5747, pp. 947-986.