Two-dimensional–three-dimensional correspondence in mammography

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-105

  Martí, Robert ^a   Zwiggelaar, Reyer ^a   Rubin, Carolinem E ^b   Denton, Erikar E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL SOUTH HANTS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; X RAYS;

MODALITIES; MR INFORMATION; TWO DIMENSIONAL DATA;

CYBERNETICS;

EID: 2642555605     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019697204902446858     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alpert, N., D. Berdichevsky, Z. Levin, E. Morris, and A. Fischman. 1996. Improved methods for image registration. Neuroimage, 3:10-18.
2. Behrenbruch, C., P. Armitage, J. Brady, K. Marias, J. Clarke, and N. Moore. 2000a. The generation of simulated mammograms from contrast enhanced MRI for surgical planning and postoperative assessment. In 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 697-704, edited by M. Yafee. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing.
3. Behrenbruch, C., M. Yam, J. Brady, K. Marias, and R. English. 2000b. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to model breast compression in X-ray mammography for MR/X-ray data fusion. In 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 688-696, edited by M. Yafee. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing.
4. Bilmes, J. 1997. A gentle tutorial of the EM algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models. Technical Report 21, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
5. Brown, L. 1992. A survey of image registration techniques. In ACM computing-surveys, vol. 24, pp. 325-376. New York: ACM Press.
6. Demster, P., N. Laird, and D. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39:1-38.
7. Friedrich, M. 1998. MRI of the breast: State of the art. European Radiology, 8:707-725.
8. Georgsson, F. 2001. Multi view 3 dimensional reconstructions of points in mammograms. In Proceedings of the SSAB Symposium, pp. 41-44. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish Society for Automated Image Analysis.
9. Glasbey, C. A., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. A review of image-warping methods. Journal of Applied Statistics, 25(2):155-171.
10. Guillemaud, R., and M. Brady. 1997. Estimating the bias field of MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(3):238-251.
11. Hayton, P. M., M. Brady, S. M. Smith, and N. Moore. 1999. A non-rigid registration algorithm for dynamic breast MR images. Artificial Intelligence, 114:125-156.
12. Highnam, R., Y. Kita, M. Brady, B. Shepstone, and R. English. 1998. Determining correspondence between views. In 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 111-118, edited by N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, J. Hendriks, and L. van Erning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
13. Hill, D. 1993. Combination of 3D medical images from multiple modalities. Ph.D. Dissertation, United Medical and Dental Schools, University of London.
14. Hill, D., P. Batchelor, M. Holden, and D. Hawkes. 2001. Medical image registration. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 46:R1-R45.
15. Hubbell, J., and S. Seltzer. 1997. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithesburg, MD. Available at http://physics.nist.gov/xaamdi (accessed March 6, 2002).
16. Kallergi, M., K. Woods, L. Clarke, W. Qian, and R. Clark. 1992. Image segmentation in digital mammography-Comparison of local thresholding and region growing algorithms. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 16(5):323-331.
17. Karssemeijer, N., and G. T. Brake. 1998. Combining single view features and asymmetry for detection of mass lesions. In 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 95-102, edited by N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, J. Hendriks, and L. van Erning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
18. Kok-Wiles, S., M. Brady, and R. Highnam. 1998. Comparing mammogram pairs for the detection of lesions. In 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 103-110, edited by N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, J. Hendriks, and L. van Erning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
19. Kruger, S., and A. Calway. 1998. Image registration using multiresolution frequency domain correlation. In 9th British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 316-325. Malvern, UK: British Machine Vision Association.
20. Lanyi, M. 1988. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis ofbreast calcifications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21. Lucht, R., S. Delorme, and G. Brix. 2002. Neural network-based segmentation of dynamic MR mammographic images. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 20(2):147-154.
22. Maes, F., A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marechal, and R. Suetens. 1997. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(2):187-198.
23. Maintz, J., P. van den Elsen, and M. Viergever. 1996a. Comparison of edge-based and ridge-based registration of CT and MR brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 1(2):151-161.
24. Maintz, J., P. van den Elsen, and M. Viergever. 1996b. Evaluation of ridge seeking operators for multimodality medical image matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(4):353-365.
25. Maintz, J., P. van den Elsen, and M. Viergever. 2001. 3D multimodality medical image registration using morphological tools. Image and Vision Computing, 19:53-62.
26. Marias, K., J. Brady, R. Highnam, S. Parbhoo, and A. Seifalian. 1999. Registration and matching of temporal mammograms for detecting abnormalities. In 3rd Conference on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, pp. 97-100. Malvern, UK: British Machine Vision Association.
27. Marias, K., C. P. Behrenbruch, M. Brady, S. Parbhoo, and A. Seifalian. 2000. Multiscale landmark selection for improved registration of temporal mammograms. In 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 580-586, edited by M. Yafee. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing.
28. Marti, R., R. Zwiggelaar, and C. Rubin. 2001. Tracking mammographic structures over time. In 12th British Machine Vison Conference, pp. 143-152. Malvern, UK: British Machine Vision Association.
29. Marti, R., R. Zwiggelaar, and C. Rubin. 2002. Automatic point correspondence and registration based on linear structures. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 16(3):331-340.
30. Maurer, C. R., and J. M. Fitzpatrick. 1993. A review of medical image registration. In Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, pp. 17-44, edited by R. J. Maciunas. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons.
31. Muller, T., R. Stotzka, and D. McCoy. 2000. 3-D reconstruction of clustered microcalcifications: Software components. In 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 742-747, edited by M. Yafee. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing.
32. Nishikawa, R., M. Giger, K. Doi, C. Vyborny, and R. Schmidt. 1995. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 33(2):174-178.
33. Pennec, X., N. Ayache, and J.-P. Thirion. 2000. Landmark-based registration using features identified through differential geometry. In Handbook of Medical Imaging, chap. 31, pp. 499-513, edited by I. Bankman. San Diego: Academic Press.
34. Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., J. Garcia, J. Fdez-Valdivia, and X. Fdez-Vidal. 1999. The RGFF representational model: A system for the automatically learned partitioning of visual patterns in digital images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(10):1044-1073.
35. Rueckert, D., L. I. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D. L. G. Hill, M. O. Leach, and D. J. Hawkes. 1999. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(8):712-721.
36. Sallam, M., and K. Bowyer. 1999. Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images. Medical Image Analysis, 3(2):103-118.
37. Sharman, R., J. Tyler, and O. Pianykh. 2000. A fast and accurate method to register medical images using wavelet modulus maxima. Pattern Recognition Letters, 21:447-462.
38. Styner, M., C. Brechbuhler, G. Szekely, and G. Gerig. 2000. Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 19(3):153-165.
39. Tabar, L., and P. Dean. 1985. The mammographic teaching atlas. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag.
40. Valdivieso-Casique, M., and S. Arridge. 1999. Non-linear registration using a finite element method. In 10th British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 214-223. Malvern, UK: British Machine Vision Association.
41. van den Elsen, P. A., E. D. Pol, and M. A. Viergever. 1993. Medical image matching-A review with classification. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 3:26-39.
42. Viola, P. A. 1995. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence laboratory, Cambridge, MA.
43. Vujovic, N., and D. Brzakovic. 1997. Establishing the correspondence between control point in pairs of mammographic images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(10):1388-1399.
44. Webb, S., ed. 1992. The physics of medical imaging. London: Institute of Physics Publishing.
45. Wells, W., W. Grimson, R. Kikinis, and F. Jolesz. 1996. Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 15(4):429-442.
46. West, J., J. Fitzpatrick, M. Y. Wang, B. Dawant, C. Maurer, R. Kessler, R. Maciunas, C. Barillot, D. Lemoine, A. Collignon, F. Maes, P. Suetens, D. Vandermeulen, P. van den Elsen, S. Napel, T. Sumanaweera, B. Harkness, P. Hemler, D. Hill, D. Hawkes, C. Stuldhome, J. Maintz, M. Viergever, G. Malandain, X. Pennec, M. Noz, G. Maguire, M. Pollack, C. Pelizzari, R. Robb, D. Hanson, and R. Woods. 1997. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 21(4):554-566.
47. Wismuller, A., O. Lange, D. Dersch, G. Leinsinger, K. Hahn, B. Putz, and D. Auer. 2002. Cluster analysis of biomedical image time-series. International Journal of Computer Vision, 46(2):103-128.
48. Yam, M., M. Brady, R. Highmam, C. Behrenbruch, R. English, and Y. Kita. 2001. Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalicification clusters from two mammographic views. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20(6):479-489.