MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 966-975

  Mertzanidou, Thomy ^a   Hipwell, John ^a   Cardoso, M Jorge ^a   Zhang, Xiying ^a   Tanner, Christine ^b   Ourselin, Sebastien ^a   Bick, Ulrich ^d   Huisman, Henkjan ^c   Karssemeijer, Nico ^c   Hawkes, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

2D 3D registration; Breast tissue classification; Mammography; Multimodal registration

Indexed keywords

2D/3D REGISTRATION; 3-D IMAGE; AFFINE TRANSFORMATIONS; BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS; BREAST TISSUE CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL DATA; CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC TOOL; CLINICAL USE; FUNCTIONAL INFORMATION; IMAGING PROCESS; INTENSITY-BASED REGISTRATION; LARGE DEFORMATIONS; LOCALISATION; MEAN ERRORS; MR IMAGES; MULTIMODAL REGISTRATION; REGISTRATION ERROR; REGISTRATION METHODS; TRANSFORMATION MODEL; X-RAY IMAGE; X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY; XRAY IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; OPTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE; X RAY ANALYSIS; X RAY SCREENS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; X RAY MAMMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84861995257     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beer A. Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Flüssigkeiten. Annalen der Physik 1852, 162:78-88.
2. Behrenbruch C., Marias K., Armitage P., Moore N., English R., Clarke J., Brady M. Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Medical Image Analysis 2003, 7:311-340.
3. Benndorf M., Baltzer P.A.T., Vag T., Gajda M., Runnebaum I.B., Kaiser W.A. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes. Acta Radiologica 2010, 51:715-721.
4. Cardoso M., Clarkson M., Ridgway G., Modat M., Fox N., Ourselin S. The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative, load: a locally adaptive cortical segmentation algorithm. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1386-1397.
5. Cranley, K., Gilmore, B., Fogarty, G., Desponds, L., 1997. Catalogue of Diagnostic X-ray Spectra and Other Data. Technical Report. The Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
6. Gubern-Merida, A., Kallenberg, M., Marti, R., Karssemeijer, N., 2011. Fully automatic fibroglandular tissue segmentation in breast MRI: atlas-based approach, in: MICCAI Workshop on Breast Image Analysis, pp. 73-80.
7. Hipwell J., Tanner C., Crum W., Schnabel J., Hawkes D. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2007, 26:1190-1200.
8. Hopp, T., Baltzer, P., Dietzel, M., Kaiser, W., Ruiter, N., 2011. 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, in press.
9. Hubbell, J., Seltzer, S., 2004. Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients from 1keV to 20MeV for Elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest. Technical Report. Ionizing Radiation Division, Physics Laboratory, NIST. 100 Bureau Drive, M/S 8460 Gaithersburg, MD.
10. ITK, Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit. <>. http://www.itk.org.
11. Johns P., Yaffe M. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1987, 32:675-695.
12. Leach M., Boggis C., Dixon A., Easton D., Eeles R., Evans D., Gilbert F., Griebsch I., Hoff R., Kessar P., Lakhani S., Moss S., Nerurkar A., Padhani A., Pointon L., Thompson D., Warren R. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). The Lancet 2005, 365:1769-1778.
13. van Leemput K., Maes F., Vandermeulen D., Suetens P. Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18:897-908.
14. Marti R., Zwiggelaar R., Rubin C., Denton E. 2D-3D correspondence in mammography. Cybernetics and Systems 2004, 35:85-105.
15. Mertzanidou, T., Hipwell, J., Cardoso, M., Tanner, C., Ourselin, S., Hawkes, D., 2010a. X-ray mammography - MRI registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation and an EM-MRF for breast tissue classification, in: International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 23-30.
16. Mertzanidou, T., Hipwell, J., Tanner, C., Hawkes, D., 2010b. An intensity-based approach to X-ray mammography - MRI registration, in: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing, pp. 7623-106.
17. NICE, 2006. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Familial Breast Cancer: Quick Reference Guide.
18. Nie K., Chen J., Chan S., Chau M., Yu H., Bahri S., Tseng T., Nalcioglu O., Su M. Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI. Medical Physics 2008, 35:5253-5262.
19. Robinson D., Scrimger J. Monoenergetic approximation of a polyenergetic beam - a theoretical approach. British Journal of Radiology 1991, 64:452-454.
20. Rueckert D., Sonoda L., Hayes C., Hill D., Leach M., Hawkes D. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18:712-721.
21. Ruiter N., Stotzka R., Muller T., Gemmeke H., Reichenbach J., Kaiser W. Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and mr images of the female breast. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2006, 53:204-211.
22. Tanner, C., Hipwell, J., Hawkes, D., 2009. Using Statistical Deformation Models for the Registration of Multimodal Breast Images, in: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 72590P-72590P-9.
23. Tanner C., White M., Guarino S., Hall-Craggs M., Douek M., Hawkes D. Large breast compressions - observations and evaluation of simulations. Medical Physics 2011, 38:682-690.
24. Wei J., Chan H., Helvie M., Roubidoux M., Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L., Zhou C., Chenevert S.P.T., Goodsitt M. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. Medical Physics 2004, 31:933-942.
25. Yuan Y., Giger M., Li H., Bhooshan N., Sennett C. Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Academic Radiology 2010, 17:1158-1167.