Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course

Computers and Education

Volumn 68, Issue , 2013, Pages 586-596

  Di Serio, Ángela ^a   Ibáñez, María Blanca ^b   Kloos, Carlos Delgado ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD SIMÓN BOLÍVAR   (Venezuela)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Middle school education; Motivation

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; MOTIVATION;

AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEMS; AUGMENTED REALITY TECHNOLOGY; CONFIDENCE FACTORS; INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MIDDLE SCHOOL EDUCATIONS; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS; USABILITY STUDIES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84884900859     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M.-T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85, Elsevier Ltd.
2. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 355-385.
3. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47, IEEE Computer Society. (Pubitemid 33048164)
4. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, A game without guns. Educational Research & Development, 53(1), 86-107. (Pubitemid 40447887)
5. Barger, A., & Byrd, K. (2011). Motivation and computer-based instructional design. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 4(1), 1-9.
6. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrew, L. (2001). The MagicBook: moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2-4.
7. Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2), 714-722, Elsevier Ltd.
8. Bower, M. (2008). Affordance analysis - matching learning tasks with learning technologies. Educational Media International, 45(1), 3-15, Routledge.
9. Burigat, S., & Chittaro, L. (2007). Navigation in 3D virtual environments: effects of user experience and location-pointing navigation aids. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 65(11), 945-958, Elsevier. (Pubitemid 47369214)
10. Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2010). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341-377, Springer Netherlands.
11. Chien, C.-Huan, Chen, C.-Hsu, & Jeng, T.-Sheng. (2010). An interactive augmented reality system for learning anatomy structure. Computer, I. IAENG.
12. Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3-18, Elsevier. (Pubitemid 46161989)
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial.
14. Dünser, A., Steinbügl, K., Kaufmann, H., & Glück, J. (2006). Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on computer-human interaction (pp. 125-132). (Pubitemid 47140903)
15. Dalgarno, B. (2004). A classification scheme for learner-computer interaction. In Annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education (pp. 240-248).
16. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
17. Dickey, M. D. (2005). Brave new (interactive) worlds: a review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1-2), 121-137, Routledge. (Pubitemid 41388526)
18. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Introduction to theories of learning instruction. Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Dror, I. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics Cognition, 2(2), 215-223, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
20. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22, Springer Netherlands.
21. Efklides, A., Kuhl, J., & Sorrentino, R. M. (2001). Trends and prospects in motivation research. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academia.
22. Green, M., & Sulbaran, T. (2006). Motivation assessment instrument for virtual reality scheduling simulator. In T. Reeves, & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2006 (pp. 45-59). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
23. Gutiérrez, M. J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., López, P. D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
24. Henderson, S., & Feiner, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits of augmented reality documentation for maintenance and repair. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(10), 1355-1368.
25. Huang, D. W., Diefes-Dux, H., Imbrie, P. K., Daku, B., & Kallimani, J. G. (2004). Learning motivation evaluation for a computer-based instructional tutorial using ARCS model of motivational design. In 34th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference T1E.
26. Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182, Elsevier Ltd.
27. Huitt, W. (2011). Motivation to learn: an overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/motivation/motivate.html.
28. Jeamu, L, Kim, Y., & Lee, Y. (2008). A web-based program to motivate underachievers learning number sense. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(2), 185-194.
29. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Technology as cognitive tools: learners as designers. ITForum Paper, 1, 1-7, Retrieved from. http://aurorem.free.fr/ partiels/sem7/cours/textesprincipaux/ITForum-Paper1-jonassen.pdf.
30. Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26-34.
31. Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
32. Keller, J. M. (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
33. Keller, J. M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 6(2), 79-104.
34. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. Science + Business Media227-286, Springer.
35. Keller, J. M., & Litchfield, B. C. (2002). Motivation and performance. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. New Jersey: Merill Prenctice Hall.
36. Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion fora consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(3), 263-291, Springer.
37. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives-the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(2), 203-228, Springer.
38. Krevelen, D. W. F. V., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20.
39. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L Baker, & H. F. O'Neill, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-33). Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Kye, B., & Kim, Y (2008). Investigation of the relationships between media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality based learning augmented reality. International Journal, 2(1), 4-14.
41. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), 20, Wiley Online Library.
42. Maier, P., Tönnis, M., & Klinker, G. (2009). Dynamics in tangible chemical reactions. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, 57, 80-87.
43. Milgram, P., & Kishino, A. F. (1994). Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), 1321-1329.
44. Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
45. Narzt, W., Pomberger, G., Ferscha, A., Kolb, D., Müller, R., Wieghardt, J., et al (2005). Augmented reality navigation systems. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(3), 177-187, Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 43298557)
46. Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K., Bogen, M., Wind, J. & Giuliano, A. (2006). ARISE - Augmented Reality in School Environments. In Nejdl, W, Tochtermann, K. (Eds.), pp. 709-714. Springer.
47. Neumann, U, & Majoros, A. (1998). Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance. In Proceedings IEEE 1998 virtual reality annual international symposium Cat No98CB36180 (pp. 4-11). IEEE Comput. Soc.
48. Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox. Retrieved 2011-07-25. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ 20030825.html.
49. Nilsson, S., Johansson, B. J. E., & Jönsson, A. (2010). Cross-organisational collaboration supported by augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(X).
50. Perry, R. P. (1991). Perceived control. In the collage classroom. In Smart, J. C. (Ed.). (1991). Higher education handbook of theory and research, Vol. 7. New York: Agathon.
51. Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470, Elsevier. (Pubitemid 41167991)
52. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 3340, American Psychological Association.
53. Platonov, J., Heibel, H., Meier, P., & Grollmann, B. (2006). A mobile markerless AR system for maintenance and repair. In 2006IEEE-ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (pp. 105-108). IEEE.
54. Raffini, J. (1993). Winners without losers: Structures and strategies for increasing student motivation to learn. Allyn & Bacon Publishers.
55. Rodgers, D. L, & Withrow-Thorton, B. J. (2005). The effect of instructional media on learner motivation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 32, 91-106.
56. Rost, M. (2010). Generating student motivation [Internet]. WorldView, Pearson Longman. Available from Accessed 25.08.11.
57. Rovai, A. P., and Ponton., M. K., Wighting, M. J., & Baker, J. D. (2007). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and E-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 413-432.
58. Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement. In What the most current research has to Say San Francisco Milken exchange. Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
59. Schmidt, J. T. (2007). Preparing students for success in blended learning environments: future oriented motivation & self-regulation. Educational Research, 301-302.
60. Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4), 591-611.
61. Shen, J., & Eder, L. B. (2009). Intentions to use virtual worlds for education. Journal of Information System Education, 20(2), 225-233.
62. Sherman, W R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality. New York: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
63. Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1997. Software Publisher's Association.
64. Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Dimensions of mobile augmented reality for learning: a first inventory. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), 117-127.
65. Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice, Vol. 4. Allyn and Bacon.
66. Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. In 2010 second international conference on computer engineering and applications, Vol. 2 (pp. 461-465).
67. Svinicki, M. (1999). New directions in learning and motivation. In M. D. Svinicki (Ed.), Teaching and learning on the edge of the millennium: Building on what we have learned. New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. Taran, C. (2005). Motivation techniques in elearning, ICALT 2005. In Fifth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 617-619). (Pubitemid 44459468)
69. Theall, M. (1999a). Motivation from within: encouraging faculty and students to excel. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, N. 78. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Theall, M. (1999b). New directions for theory and research on teaching: a review of the past twenty years (80). New Directions for Teaching and Learning 29-52, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71. Vianin, P. (2006). La motivation scolaire: Comment susciter le désir d'apprendre? Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier, Editions De Boeck Universite.
72. Wlodkowski, R. J. (1978). Motivation and teaching: A practical guide. National Education Association.
73. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal Setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.