Words, numbers, & numeracy: Diminishing individual differences in Bayesian reasoning

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 28, Issue , 2013, Pages 34-40

  Johnson, Eric D ^a   Tubau, Elisabet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian reasoning; Individual differences; Numeracy; Problem structure; Statistical format; Verbal complexity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884784803     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brase G.L. Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15(2):284-289.
2. Brase G.L., Cosmides L., Tooby J. Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1998, 127(1):3-21.
3. Brown M.B., Fuchs C. On maximum likelihood estimation in sparse contingency tables. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1983, 1:3-15.
4. Butcher K.R., Kintsch W. Text comprehension and discourse processing. Handbook of Psychology 2003, 575-595.
5. Casscells W., Schoenberger A., Grayboys T. Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. The New England Journal of Medicine 1978, 299:999-1000.
6. Chapman G., Liu J. Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making 2009, 4(1):34-40.
7. Cokely E.T., Galesic M., Schulz E., Ghazal S., Garcia-Retamero R. Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin numeracy test. Judgment and Decision Making 2012, 7(1):25-47.
8. Cokely E.T., Kelley C.M. Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making 2009, 4(1):20-33.
9. Cosmides L., Tooby J. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 1996, 58:1-73.
10. Galesic M., Garcia-Retamero R., Gigerenzer G. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychology 2009, 28:210-216.
11. Gigerenzer G. How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond "heuristics and biases". European review of social psychology 1991, Vol. 2:83-115. Willey & Sons Ltd. W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone (Eds.).
12. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 1995, 102(4):684-704.
13. Girotto V., Gonzalez M. Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition 2001, 78:247-276.
14. Hill W.T., Brase G.L. When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2012, 10.1080/17470218.2012.687004.
15. Hoffrage U., Gigerenzer G., Krauss S., Martignon L. Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition 2002, 84:343-352.
16. Lesage E., Navarrete G., De Neys W. Evolutionary modules and Bayesian facilitation: The role of general cognitive resources. Thinking and Reasoning 2013, 19(1):27-53.
17. Liberali J.M., Reyna V.F., Furlan S., Stein L.M., Pardo S.T. Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2011, 10.1002/bdm.752.
18. Lipkus I.M., Samsa G., Rimer B.K. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making 2001, 21:37-44.
19. Mellers B.A., McGraw A.P. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage. Psychological Review 1999, 106:417-424.
20. Peters E., Dieckmann N., Dixon A., Hibbard J.H., Mertz C.K. Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review 2007, 64:169-190.
21. Peters E., Vastfjall D., Slovic P., Mertz C.K., Mazzocco K., Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science 2006, 17(5):407-413.
22. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. The importance of mathematics health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences 2007, 17(2):147-159.
23. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences 2008, 18(1):89-107.
24. Schapira M.M., Walker C.M., Cappaert K.J., Ganschow P.S., Fletcher K.E., McGinley E.L., et al. The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: A measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory. Medical Decision Making 2012, 32:851-865.
25. Sloman S.A., Over D., Slovak L., Stibel J.M. Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 91:296-309.
26. Tubau E. Enhancing probabilistic reasoning: The role of causal graphs, statistical format and numerical skills. Learning and Individual Differences 2008, 18:187-196.
27. Yamagishi K. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: Frequency or nested sets?. Experimental Psychology 2003, 50(2):97-106.