The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 147-159

  Reyna, Valerie F ^a   Brainerd, Charles J ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuzzy trace theory; Health literacy; Numeracy; Probability judgment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447135028     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adelsward V., and Sachs L. The meaning of 6.8: Numeracy and normality in health information talks. Social Science & Medicine 43 (1996) 1179-1187
2. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy. Health literacy: Report of the council on scientific affairs. Journal of the American Medical Association 281 (1999) 552-557
3. Baker D.W. The meaning and the measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21 (2006) 878-883
4. Baker D.W., Williams M.V., Parker R.M., Gazmararian J.A., and Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 38 (1999) 33-42
5. Berkman N.D., DeWalt D.A., Pignone M.P., Sheridan S.L., Lohr K.N., Lux L., et al. Literacy and Health Outcomes. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87 (Prepared by RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016) AHRQ Publication No. 04-E007-1 (2004), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
6. Black W.C., Nease Jr., and Tosteson A.N. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87 (1995) 720-731
7. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J., and Jarvis W. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996) 197-253
8. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 49 (1994) 709-724
9. Estrada C.A., Martin-Hryniewicz M., Peek B.T., Collins C., and Byrd J.C. Literacy and numeracy skills and anticoagulation control. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 328 (2004) 88-93
10. Educational Testing Service. Test content for health activities literacy tests (2006). http://www.ets.org/etsliteracy/ Accessed September 16, 2006
11. Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P., Smiht, D., Zikmund-Fisher, B. (in press). Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication.
12. Fagerlin A., Zikmund-Fisher B.J., and Ubel P. How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: Shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Education and Counseling 57 3 (2005) 294-299
13. Gigerenzer G. Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology (and vice versa). In: Wright G., and Ayton P. (Eds). Subjective probability (1994), Wiley, New York 129-161
14. Gigerenzer G., and Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 684-704
15. Gonzales, P., Guzmán, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., et al. (2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005-005). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
16. Hauser R.M., Edley C.F., Koenig J.A., and Elliott S.W. Measuring Literacy: Performance Levels for Adults, Interim Report (2005), National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
17. Hecht S.A., Close L., and Santisi M. Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 86 (2003) 277-302
18. Hoemann H.W., and Ross B.M. Children's concepts of chance and probability. In: Brainerd C. (Ed). Children's logical and mathematical cognition (1982), Springer-Verlag, New York
19. Institute of Medicine. Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion (2004), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
20. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. (Eds). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
21. Kirsch I., Jungeblut A., Jenkins L., and Kolstad A. Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey (1993), National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
22. Kokis J.V., Macpherson R., Toplak M.E., West R.F., and Stanovich K.E. Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83 (2002) 26-52
23. Klaczynski P.A. Framing effects on adolescent task representations, analytic and heuristic processing, and decision making: Implications for the normative-descriptive gap. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 22 (2001) 289-309
24. Kutner M., Greenberg E., Jin Y., and Paulsen C. The health literacy of America's adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483) (2006), U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC
25. Lemke M., Sen A., Pahlke E., Partelow L., Miller D., Williams T., et al. International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving: PISA 2003 results from the U.S. perspective (2004) NCES 2005-003. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
26. Lipkus I.M., Samsa G., and Rimer B.K. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making 21 (2001) 37-44
27. Lloyd F.J., and Reyna V.F. A web exercise in evidence-based medicine using cognitive theory. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16 (2001) 94-99
28. National Mathematics Panel. National Mathematics Advisory Panel: Strengthening math education through research (2006). http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/factsheet.html Accessed September 29, 2006 from
29. National Science Board. National Science Board Commission on 21st century education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (2006). http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/edu_com/ Accessed September 29, 2006 from
30. Pacini R., and Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 972-987
31. Parker R.M., Baker D.W., Williams M.V., and Nurss J.R. The Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA): A new instrument for measuring patient's literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine 10 (1995) 537-542
32. Paulos J.A. Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences (1989), Farrar, Straus, and Giroux (Hill and Wang Division), New York
33. Perie, M., Grigg, W. S., Dion, G. S. (2005). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES 2006-453). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
34. Perie, M., Moran, R., Lutkus, A. D. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics (NCES 2005-464). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
35. Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H.,Mertz, C. K. (in press). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review.
36. Peters E., Vastfjall D., Slovic P., Mertz C.K., Mozzocco K., and Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 406-413
37. Piaget J. The origin of the idea of chance in children (1975), Norton, New York
38. Reyna V.F. Class inclusion, the conjunction fallacy, and other cognitive illusions. Developmental Review 11 (1991) 317-336
39. Reyna V.F. How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual-processes approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13 (2004) 60-66
40. Reyna V.F., and Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory and children's acquisition of mathematical and scientific concepts. Learning and Individual Differences 3 (1991) 27-59
41. Reyna V.F., and Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice. Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 4 (1991) 249-262
42. Reyna V.F., and Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy memory and mathematics in the classroom. In: Davies G.M., and Logie R.H. (Eds). Anonymous. Memory in everyday life (1993), North Holland Press, Amsterdam 91-119
43. Reyna V.F., and Brainerd C.J. The origins of probability judgement: A review of data and theories. In: Wright G., and Ayton P. (Eds). Subjective probability (1994), Wiley, New York 239-272
44. Reyna V.F., and Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences 7 1 (1995) 1-75
45. Reyna, V. F.,Brainerd, C. J. (in press). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences.
46. Rudd R.E., Moeykens B.A., and Colton T.C. Health and literacy: A review of medical and public health literature. Review of adult learning and literacy Vol. 1 (1999), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
47. Schwartz S.R., McDowell J., and Yueh B. Numeracy and the shortcomings of utility assessment in head and neck. Head and Neck 26 5 (2004) 401-407
48. Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., Black W.C., and Welch H.G. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine 127 (1997) 966-972
49. Siegler R.S. Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 46 (1981) (Whole No 189)
50. Siegler R.S. Children's thinking (1991), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
51. Simon A.F., Fagley N.S., and Halleran J.G. Decision framing: Moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17 (2004) 77-93
52. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1998) 289-317
53. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 645-726
54. Weiss B.D., Mays M.Z., Martz W., Castro K.M., DeWalt D.A., Pignone M.P., et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Annals of Family Medicine 3 6 (2005) 514-522
55. Weinfurt K.P., Castel L.D., Li Y., Sulmasy D.P., Balshem A.M., Benson III A.B., et al. The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials. Cancer 98 (2003) 166-175
56. White, S., & Dillow, S. (2005). Key Concepts and Features of the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-471). U.S. Department of Education.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
57. Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., Moncur, M., Gabriel, S., & Tosteson, A. (2000, March). Assessing values for current health: Numeracy matters. Presentation at the Veterans Administration's Career Development Awardees Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
58. Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M., Moncur M., Gabriel S., and Tosteson A.N. Assessing values for health: Numeracy matters. Medical Decision Making 21 5 (2001) 382-390