Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting

Public Performance and Management Review

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 33-58

  Martí, Caridad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

accrual budgeting; Australia; central government; New Zealand; performance budgeting; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884750797     PISSN: 15309576     EISSN: 15579271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576370102     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andrews, M. (2004). Authority, acceptance, ability and performance-based budgeting reforms. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4/5), 332-344. (Pubitemid 38990695)
2. Andrews, M., & Hill, H. (2003). The impact of traditional budget systems on the effectiveness of performance-based budgeting: A different viewpoint on recent findings. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 135-155.
3. Blöndal, J.R. (2004). Issues in accrual budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(1), 103-119.
4. Bourdeaux, C. (2008). Integrating performance information into legislative budget processes. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(4), 547-569.
5. Campbell, C. (2001). Juggling inputs, outputs, outcomes in the search for policy competence: Recent experience in Australia. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 14(2), 253-282.
6. Campos, J.E., & Pradhan, S. (1997). Evaluating public expenditure management systems: An experimental methodology with an application to the Australia and New Zealand reforms. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(3), 423-445.
7. Carlin, T., & Guthrie, J. (2003). Accrual output based budgeting systems in Australia: The rhetoric-reality gap. Public Management Review, 5(2), 145-162. (Pubitemid 36853726)
8. Carlin, T.M. (2004). Output-based management and the management of performance: Insights from the Victorian experience. Management Accounting Research, 15, 267-283. (Pubitemid 39167891)
9. Curristine, T.; Lonti, Z.; & Joumard, I. (2007). Improving public sector efficiency: Challenges and opportunities. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1), 1-42.
10. Gilmour, J.B., & Lewis, D.E. (2006). Does performance budgeting work An examination of the Office of Management and Budget's PART scores. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 742-752. (Pubitemid 44359289)
11. Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1-25. (Pubitemid 33633550)
12. Guthrie, J.; Olson, O.; & Humphrey, C. (1999). Debating developments in New Public Financial Management: The limits of global theorizing and some new ways forward. Financial Accountability and Management, 15(3), 209-228.
13. Ha, Y.-S. (2002). A comparative study of budgetary and financial management reforms: The cases of Australia, New Zealand, and Sweden. International Review of Public Administration, 7(1), 123-136.
14. Hawke, L. (2007). Performance budgeting in Australia. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(3), 1-15.
15. Helmuth, U. (2010). Better performance with performance budgeting Analyzing cases of success and failure in public administrations. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 408-428.
16. H.M. Treasury (2011). Supply estimates: A guidance manual. London.
17. Ho, A.T. (2011). PBB in American local governments: It's more than a management tool. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 391-401.
18. Hood, C. (1995). The New Public Management in the 1980's: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93-109.
19. Hou, Y.; Lunsford, R.S.; Sides, K.C.; & Jones, K.A. (2011). State performance-based budgeting in boom and bust years: An analytic framework and survey of the states. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 370-388.
20. International Federation of Accountants. (1991). Financial reporting by national governments. New York: IFAC Public Sector Committee Study.
21. International Federation of Accountants. (1993). Elements of the financial statements of national governments. New York: IFAC Public Sector Committee Study.
22. Institute for Government. (2009). Public expenditure management in a time of fiscal constraint. Seminar series: Performance budgeting. London.
23. Jones, R., & Lüder, K. (2011). The federal government of Germany's circumspection concerning accrual budgeting and accounting. Public Money and Management, 31(4), 265-270.
24. Joyce, P.G. (2003). Linking performance and budgeting: Opportunities in the federal budget process. Washington, DC: IBM Center on the Business of Government.
25. Kelly, J., & Wanna, J. (2004). Crashing through with accrual-output price budgeting in Australia: Technical adjustment or a new way of doing business American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 94-111. (Pubitemid 38582801)
26. Kong, D. (2005). Performance-based budgeting: The U.S. experience. Public Organization Review, 5(2), 91-197.
27. Lapsley, I. (1999). Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalizing modernity Financial Accountability and Management, 15(3), 201-208.
28. Laughlin, R., & Pallot, J. (1998). Trends, patterns and influencing factors: Some reflections. In O. Olson, J. Guthrie, & C. Humphrey (Eds.), Global warning: Debating international developments in New Public Financial Management (pp. 376-399). Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
29. Lee, J.Y., & Wang, X. (2009). Assessing the impact of performance-based budgeting: A comparative analysis across the United States, Taiwan and China. Public Administration Review, 69(Special Issue), 60-66.
30. Likierman, A. (2003). Planning and controlling UK public expenditure on a resource basis. Public Money and Management, 23(1), 45-50. (Pubitemid 36539653)
31. Lu, Y. (2011). Individual engagement to collective participation: The dynamics of participation pattern in performance budgeting. Public Budgeting and Finance, 31(2), 79-98.
32. Lu, Y.; Willoughby, K.; & Arnett, S. (2009). Legislating results: Examining the legal foundations of PBB systems in the states. Public Performance and Management Review, 33(2), 266-287.
33. Lüder, K., & Jones, R. (Eds.). (2003). Reforming governmental accounting and budgeting in Europe. Frankfurt: Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft/PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
34. Lye, J.; Perera, H.; & Rahman, A. (2005). The evolution of accruals-based Crown (government) financial statements in New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(6), 784-815. (Pubitemid 41649196)
35. Melkers, J.E., & Willoughby, K. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66-73. (Pubitemid 128457721)
36. Melkers, J.E., & Willoughby, K.G. (2001). Budgeters' views of state performance-budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 54-64. (Pubitemid 33604245)
37. Moynihan, D.P. (2005). What do we talk about when we talk about performance Dialogue theory and performance budgeting. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 16(2), 151-168. (Pubitemid 43448221)
38. Moynihan, D.P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77-89. (Pubitemid 43424452)
39. Myers, J. (2009). Performance budgeting, managing public expenditure in a time of fiscal constraint. London: Institute for Government meeting series.
40. Näsi, S. (2003). Finland chapter. In K. Lüder & R. Jones (Eds.), Reforming governmental accounting and budgeting in Europe (pp. 59-152). Frankfurt: Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft/PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
41. New Zealand Treasury. (2011). Putting it together: An explanatory guide to New Zealand's state sector financial management system. Available at www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/guidance/publicfinance/pit/, accessed November 15, 2011.
42. OECD. (2007). Performance budgeting in OECD countries. Paris.
43. OECD. (2008). Performance budgeting: A users' guide. Policy Brief, Public Affairs Division. Paris.
44. Pallot, J. (2001). A decade in review: New Zealand's experience with resource accounting and budgeting. Financial Accountability and Management, 17(4), 383-400.
45. Pitsvada, B., & LoStracco, F. (2002). Performance budgeting-The next budgetary answer. But what is the question Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 14(1), 53-73.
46. Poister, T., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325-335.
47. Posner, P.L., & Fantone, D.F. (2007). Assessing federal program performance. Observations on the U.S. Office of Management and Budget's Program Assessment Rating Tool and its use in the budget process. Public Performance and Management Review, 30(3), 351-368.
48. Robinson, M. (2002). Financial control in Australian government budgeting. Public Budgeting and Finance, 22(1), 80-93.
49. Robinson, M. (2007). Cost information. In M. Robinson (Ed.), Performance budgeting: Linking funding and results (pp. 46-62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
50. Robinson, M. (2009). Accrual budgeting and fiscal policy. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 9(1), 1-29.
51. Schick, A. (2007). Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting: Decision rules or analytic tools OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(2), 109-138.
52. Sterck, M. (2007). The impact of performance budgeting on the role of the legislature: A four-country study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 189-203. (Pubitemid 46895107)
53. Sterck, M., & Scheers, B. (2006). Trends in performance budgeting in seven OECD countries. Public Performance and Management Review, 30(1), 47-72.
54. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000). Accrual budgeting: Experiences of other nations and implications for the United States. GAO/AIMD-00-57.
55. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2002). Performance budgeting: Opportunities and challenges. GAO-02-1106T. Washington, DC.
56. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Accrual budgeting useful in certain areas but does not provide sufficient information for reporting on our longer-term fiscal challenge. GAO-08-206.Washington, DC.
57. VanLandingham, G.; Wellman, M.; & Andrews, M. (2005). Useful, but not a panacea: Performance-based program budgeting in Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(3-4), 233-253.
58. Willoughby, K. (2011). Introduction to the symposium: PBB-Works like the BCS Public Administration Review, 71(3), 352-355.
59. Willoughby, K., & Melkers, J.E. (2000). Implementing PBB: Conflicting views of success. Public Budgeting and Finance, 20(1), 105-120.
60. World Bank. (2010). Results, performance budgeting and trust in government. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and World Bank.
61. Zaltsman, A. (2009). The effects of performance information on public resource allocations: A study of Chile's performance-based budgeting system. International Public Management Journal, 12(4), 450-483.