Useful, but not a panacea: Performance-based program budgeting in florida

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 28, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 233-253

  VanLandingham, Gary ^a   Wellman, Martha ^a   Andrews, Matthew ^b  

^a Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability   (United States)

^b WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646587739     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-200047313     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. A prescribed time-line is shown in OPPAGA, Supra note 2; 4.
2. The recommendation role is a powerful one, as OPPAGA can recommend that programs be terminated if it finds the programs have little or no public value.
3. Henadon, C., Winter 1999. Performance Budgeting in Florida—Half Way There. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management,: 672
4. National Legislative Program Evaluation Society Fall Training Conference Notes— Roundtable: Lessons Learned from Performance Measurement Systems, 2002 http://www.ncsl.org/programs/nlpes/training/fallconf/pds02/ perfmeasure.htm.
5. Henadon, Supra note 9; 671.
6. This issue is addressed in more detail in OPPAGA, Supra note 2; 7-8.
7. Henadon, Supra note 9; 675.
8. This issue permeates most of the document produced in November 2000: OPPAGA, 2000, Supra note 7; see in particular page 4.
9. See the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Web Site, and listed OPPAGA Justification Reviews: http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/pro-files/4122
10. State of Florida. 2002. Long Range Program Plan Instructions. Tallahassee: Executive Office of the Governor, Office of Policy and Budget, Annex F, 3.
11. State of Florida. 2002. Long Range Program Plan Instructions. Executive Office of the Governor: Tallahassee, FL, Office of Policy and Budget, Annex F, 1-4.
12. Fuchs, L., 1998. Florida Department of Revenue: The Sharp Side of the Leading Edge. The New Public Innovator,: 92
13. National Legislative Program Evaluation Society supra note 18
14. National Legislative Program Evaluation Society, supra note 18