A juxtaposition of social influences: Web 2.0 and the interaction of mass, interpersonal, and peer sources online

Strategic Uses of Social Technology: An Interactive Perspective of Social Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 172-194

  Walther, Joseph B ^a   Tong, Stephanie Tom ^b   DeAndrea, David C ^a   Carr, Caleb T ^c   Van Der Heide, Brandon ^d  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884483267     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139042802.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Atkin, C. K. (1972). Anticipated communication and mass media informationseeking. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 188-199.
2. Atkin, C. K. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information-seeking. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for communication research (pp. 205-242). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Berger, C. R., and Chaffee, S. H. (1988). On bridging the communication gap. Human Communication Research, 15, 311-318.
4. Berger, C. R., and Chaffee, S. H. (1989). Levels of analysis: An introduction. In C. R. Berger and S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 143-145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Caplan, S. E. (2001). Challenging the mass-interpersonal communication dichotomy: Are we witnessing the emergence of an entirely new communication system? Electronic Journal of Communication, 11(1). Retrieved 26 October 2007 from www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/011/1/01114.HTML
6. Cappella, J. N. (1989). Interpersonal communication: Definitions and fundamental questions. In C. R. Berger and S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 184-239). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Chaffee, S. H. (1986). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In G. Gumpert and R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (3rd edn., pp. 62-80). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Clark, R. A., and Delia, J. C. (1979). Topoi and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187-206.
9. David, C., Cappella, J. N., and Fishbein, M. (2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16, 118-140.
10. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., and Wahl, S. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 53, 255-277.
11. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., and Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152-177.
12. Glynn, C. J., and Park, E. (1997). Reference groups, opinion intensity, and public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 213-232.
13. Graham, J., Argyle, M., and Furnham, A. (1980). The goal structure of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 345-366.
14. Gumpert, G., and Cathcart, R. (Eds.) (1986). Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (3rd edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved 28 January 2010 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/942/864#h4
16. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
17. Herring, S. C., and Martinson, A. (2004). Assessing gender authenticity in computer-mediated language use: Evidence from an identity game. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 424-446.
18. Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 61-78.
19. Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York: The Free Press.
20. Kelly, K., and Edwards, R. (1992). Observations: Does discussion of advertising transformits effects?Yes … sometimes -A case among college students and their response to anti-drug advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(4), 79.
21. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B. R., and Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York/London: Columbia University Press.
22. Lee, E.-J., Jang, J.-W., and Kim, M.-J. (2009). Interpersonal interactivity in online journalism: What do readers’ comments on internet news sites tell us? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, November.
23. Levy, S. (2007). Facebook grows up. Newsweek, 27 August, pp. 40-46.
24. Lull, J. (1980). The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 6, 197-209.
25. Metzger, M. J. (2006). Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on web site trust and disclosure. Communication Research, 33, 155-179.
26. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., and Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413-439.
27. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., and Zwarun, L. (2003). College student web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers in Education, 41, 271-290.
28. Miller, H. (1995). The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the internet. Paper presented at Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space conference, Goldsmiths’ College, University of London, London, June.
29. Newhagen, J. E., and Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46, 4-13.
30. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Thousand Oaks, CA: New Riders Publishing.
31. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 25 September 2007 from www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
32. O’Sullivan, P. B. (1999). Bridging mass and interpersonal communication: Synthesis scholarship in HCR. Human Communication Research, 25, 569-588.
33. O’Sullivan, P. B. (2005). Masspersonal communication: Rethinking the mass interpersonal divide. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, May.
34. Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The self online: The utility of personal home pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 346-368.
35. Papacharissi, Z., and Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175-196.
36. Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal networks and personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Pingree, S., Wiemann, J. M., and Hawkins, R. P. (1988). Editor’s introduction: Toward conceptual synthesis. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 7-17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Postmes, T., Spears, R., and Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content, and “deindividuation” in computer-mediated groups. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, and B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 164-183). Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Reardon, K. K., and Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15, 284-303.
40. Reicher, S., Spears, R., and Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
41. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., and Kuwabara, K. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45-48.
42. Rogers, E. M., and Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.
43. Sassenberg, K., and Boos, M. (2003). Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 405-422.
44. Schutz, W. C. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
45. Southwell, B. G., and Torres, A. (2006). Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs, 73, 334-350.
46. Sundar, S. S., and Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 52-72.
47. Thompson, R., Murachver, T., and Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12, 171-175.
48. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., and Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531-549.
49. Trenholm, S. (1999). Thinking through communication: An introduction to the study of human communication. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
50. Vanden Boogart, M. R. (2006). Uncovering the social impact of Facebook on a college campus. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. Retrieved 5 July 2007 from http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/ 2097/181/4/MatthewVandenBoogart2006.pdf
51. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
52. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
53. Walther, J. B., Carr, C., Choi, S., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., Tong, S. T., and Van Der Heide, B. (2010). Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media influence sources online: A research agenda for technology convergence. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 17-38). New York: Routledge.
54. Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., and Anthony, J. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of anti-marijuana public service announcements on You Tube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469-492.
55. Walther, J. B., Gay, G., and Hancock, J. T. (2005). How do communication and technology researchers study the internet? Journal of Communication, 55, 632-657.
56. Walther, J. B., and Ramirez Jr., A. (2009). New technologies and new directions in online relating. In S. W. Smith and S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 264-284). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., and Shulman, H. (2009). Selfgenerated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computermediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229-253.
58. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., and Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
59. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Tong, S. T., Carr, C. T., and Atkin, C. K. (2010). The effects of interpersonal goals on inadvertent intrapersonal influence in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 36, 323-347.
60. Warren, J. R., Hecht, M. L., Wagstaff, D. A., Elek, E., Ndiaye, K., Dustman, P., et al. (2006). Communicating prevention: The effects of the keepin’ it REAL classroom videotapes and televised PSAs on middle-school students’ substance use. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 209-227.
61. Wenner, L. A. (1976). Functional analysis of TV viewing for older adults. Journal of Broadcasting, 20, 77-88.
62. Wiemann, J. M., Hawkins, R. P., and Pingree, S. (1988). Fragmentation in the field - and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research, 15, 304-310.
63. Wittenbaum, G.M., Hollingshead, A. B., and Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative tomotivated information sharing in groups:Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310.