New technologies and new directions in online relating

New Directions in Interpersonal Communication Research

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 264-284

  Walther, Joseph B ^a   Ramirez, Artemio ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949785418     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483349619.n13     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet [Online]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 7. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v0111/issue3/amichai-hamburger.html doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x
2. Baker, A. (1998, July). Cyberspace couples finding romance online then meeting for the first time in real life [Online]. CMC Magazine. Retrieved December 1, 2000, from http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1998/jul/baker.html
3. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.
4. Burgoon, M. (1989). Instruction about communication: On divorcing dame speech. Communication Education, 38, 303-308. doi:10.1080/03634528909378768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634528909378768
5. Carr, C. T., Choi, S. S. W., DeAndrea, D. C., Kim, J., Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., et al. (2008, May). Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media influence sources online: A research agenda for technology convergence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
6. Chan, D. K.-S., & Cheng, G. H.-L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305-320. doi:10.1177/0265407504042834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042834
7. Cummings, J. N., Lee, J. B., & Kraut, R. (2006). Communication technology and friendship during the transition from high school to college. In R. E.Kraut, M.Brynin, & S.Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 265-278). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. David, C., Cappella, J. N., & Fishbein, M. (2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16, 118-140. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00008.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00008.x
9. Dimmick, J., Ramirez, A., Jr., Lin, S.-F., & Wang, T. (2007). "Extending Society": The role of personal networks and gratification-utilities in the use of interactive communication media. New Media & Society, 9, 795-810. doi:10.1177/1461444807081225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444807081225
10. Donath, J. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29-59). New York: Routledge.
11. Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004, October). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82. doi:10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
12. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S. T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56, 255-277. doi:10.1080/03634520701236866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634520701236866
13. Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment [Online]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v0111/issue2/ellison.html doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
14. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students’ use of online social networks sites [Online]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). Retrieved August 6, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v0112/issue4/ellison.html doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
15. Gong, L. (2007, May). Testing the boundary of racial prejudice with robots. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
16. Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). "I've never clicked this much with anyone in my life": Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society, 6, 487-506. doi:10.1177/146144804044331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144804044331
17. Herring, S. C., & Martinson, A. (2004). Assessing gender authenticity in computer-mediated language use: Evidence from an identity game. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 424-446. doi:10.1177/0261927X04269586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269586
18. Hian, L. B., Chuan, S. L., Trevor, T. M. K., & Detenber, B. H. (2004). Getting to know you: Exploring the development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication [Online]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(3). Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v019/issue3/detenber.html
19. Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., & Grundin, J. (1993). Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(4), 349-375. doi:10.1145/159764.159762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/159764.159762
20. Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities [Online]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(1). Retrieved May 18, 2000, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/v015/issue1/jacobson.html
21. Labi, N. (2007, September). An IM infatuation turned to romance. Then the truth came out. WIRED, 15(9), 149-153.
22. Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Lee, E.-J. (2004). Effects of gendered character representation on person perception and informational social influence in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 779-799. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.005
24. Lee, E.-J. (2005). Effects of the influence agent's sex and self-confidence on informational influence in computer-mediated communication: Quantitative vs. verbal presentation. Communication Research, 32, 29-58. doi:10.1177/0093650204271398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650204271398
25. Liu, Y. L., Ginther, D., & Zelhart, P. (2002). An exploratory study of the effects of frequency and duration of messaging on impression development in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 73-80. doi:10.1177/089443930202000107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089443930202000107
26. Mollov, B. (2006, June). Results of Israeli and Palestinian student interactions in CMC: An analysis of attitude changes toward conflicting parties. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
27. Morningstar, C., & Farmer, F. R. (1991). The lessons of Lucasfilm's Habitat. In M.Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 273-301). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.x
30. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 8, 423-430. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.423
31. Ramirez, A., Jr., & Broneck, K. (in press). "IM Me": Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
32. Ramirez, A., Jr., Dimmick, J., Feaster, J., & Lin, S.-F. (2008). Revisiting media competition: The gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Communication Research, 35, 529-547. doi:10.1177/0093650208315979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315979
33. Ramirez, A., Jr., & Wang, Z. (2008). When on-line meets off-line: An expectancy violation theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20-39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
34. Ramirez, A., Jr., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287-310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543493
35. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9, 79-101. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2
36. Shiu, E. (2005). How Americans use Instant Messaging. [Online] Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Instantmessage_Report.pdf
37. Soller, K. (2007, August 20). Why I love it. … Newsweek, p. 44.
38. Stafford, L. (2004). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Tanis, M. (2003). Cues to identity in CMC: The impact on person perception and subsequent interaction outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
40. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. [Online] Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x
41. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
42. Van Gelder, L. (1985). The strange case of the electronic lover. Ms., October, 94, 99, 101-104, 117, 123-124.
43. Vanden Boogart, M. R. (2006). Uncovering the social impact of Facebook on a college campus. Unpublished master's thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KA.
44. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
45. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
46. Walther, J. B. (1997, June). Fahrfugnugen auf der Infobahn. Presentation at the biennial meeting of the Society of Social Psychology in the German Psychological Society, Konstanz, Germany.
47. Walther, J. B. (2004). Language and communication technology: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 384-396. doi:10.1177/0261927X04269584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269584
48. Walther, J. B. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or: (and the net: ('s with you,:) and you:) alone. In V.Manusov & M. L.Patterson (Eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 461-479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828-846. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x
50. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
51. Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36-65. doi:10.1177/0261927X04273036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04273036
52. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L.Knapp & J. A.Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ behavior on evaluations of individuals’ Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x
54. Wang, Z., Walther, J. B., Pingree, S., & Hawkins, R. (2008). Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups. Health Communication, 23, 358-368. doi:10.1080/10410230802229738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410230802229738
55. Whitty, M. T. (2002). Liar, Liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 343-352. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00059-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632%2801%2900059-0
56. Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/Sex/Location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 623-630. doi:10.1089/109493101753235223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493101753235223