The role of numeracy in moderating the influence of statistics in climate change messages

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 785-798

  Hart, P Sol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

climate change; decision making in science; environmental communication; numeracy; risk communication; risk perception; science communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884375066     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662513482268     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Avorn J,Shrank WH.Communicating drug benefits and risks effectively: There must be a better way.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;150 (8): 563-564.
2. Black WC,Nease RF,Tosteson ANA.Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1995;87 (10): 720-731.
3. Boykoff MT,Boykoff JM.Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press.Global Environmental Change. 2004;14 (2): 125-136.
4. Boykoff MT,Boykoff JM.Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage.Geoforum. 2007;38 (6): 1190-1204.
5. Dieckmann NF,Slovic P,Peters E.The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy.Risk Analysis. 2009;29 (10): 1473-1488.
6. Dunlap RE,McCright AM.A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change.Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2008;50 (5): 26-35.
7. Dunlap RE,Xiao C,McCright AM.Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism.Environmental Politics. 2001;10 (4): 23-48.
8. Frederick S.Cognitive reflection and decision making.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2005;19 (4): 25-42.
9. Gigerenzer G,Gaissmaier W,Kurz-Milcke E,Schwartz LM,Woloshin S.Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics.Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2008;8 (2): 53-96.
10. Halvorsen PA,Selmer R,Kristiansen IS.Different ways to describe the benefits of risk-reducing treatments.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;146 (12): 848-856.
11. Hart PS.One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change.Science Communication. 2011;33 (1): 28-51.
12. Hart PS,Leiserowitz AA.Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of The Day After Tomorrow.Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture. 2009;3 (3): 355-366.
13. Hart PS,Nisbet EC.Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies.Communication Research. 2012;39 (6): 701-723.
14. Hillis DM,Bull JJ.An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis.Systematic Biology. 1993;42 (2): 182-192.
15. Knouse SB.The letter of recommendation: Specificity and favorability of information.Personnel Psychology. 1983;36 (2): 331-341.
16. Krosnick JA,Holbrook AL,Visser PS.The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9 (3): 239-260.
17. Leiserowitz AA.American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?.Risk Analysis. 2005;25 (6): 1433-1442.
18. Lipkus IM,Samsa G,Rimer BK.General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.Medical Decision Making. 2001;21 (1): 37-44.
19. Maibach EW,Roser-Renouf C,Leiserowitz A.Communication and marketing as climate change-intervention assets: A public health perspective.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35 (5): 488-500.
20. Maibach EW,Roser-Renouf C,Leiserowitz AGlobal Warming's Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis. New Haven, CT Fairfax, VA: Yale Project on Climate Change, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University Center for Climate Change Communication, Department of Communication, George Mason University; 2009:.
21. McComas KA,Shanahan J.Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles.Communication Research. 1999;26 (1): 30-57.
22. McCright AM,Dunlap RE.Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims.Social Problems. 2000;47 (4): 499-522.
23. McCright AM,Dunlap RE.Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on US climate change policy.Social Problems. 2003;50 (3): 348-373.
24. Moser SC,Dilling LCreating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
25. Nisbet MC.Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement.Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2009;51 (2): 12-23.
26. O'Keefe DJ.Justification explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying support articulation in persuasive messages.Argumentation and Advocacy. 1998;35 (Fall): 61-75.
27. O'Keefe DJ.Potential conflicts between normatively-responsible advocacy and successful social influence: Evidence from persuasion effects research.Argumentation. 2007;21 (2): 151-163.
28. Peters E,Vastfjall D,Slovic P,Mertz CK,Mazzocco K,Dickert S.Numeracy and decision making.Psychological Science. 2006;17 (5): 407-413.
29. Peters E,Hibbard J,Slovic P,Dieckmann N.Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.Health Affairs. 2007;26 (3): 741-748.
30. Preacher KJ,Hayes AF.SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior Research Methods. 2004;36 (4): 717-731.
31. Preacher KJ,Hayes AF.Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.Behavior Research Methods. 2008;40 (3): 879-891.
32. Preacher KJ,Rucker DD,Hayes AF.Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007;42:185-227.
33. Reyna VF,Brainerd CJ.The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making.Learning and Individual Differences. 2007;17:147-159.
34. Reyna VF,Nelson WL,Han PK,Dieckmann NF.How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.Psychological Bulletin. 2009;135 (6): 943-973.
35. Schwartz LM,Woloshin S,Black WC,Welch HG.The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;127 (11): 966-972.
36. Schwartz LM,Woloshin S,Welch HG.Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;150 (8): 516-527.
37. Shrout PE,Bolger N.Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods. 2002;7 (4): 422-445.
38. Slovic P."If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide.Judgment and Decision Making. 2007;2 (2): 79-95.
39. Slovic P,Finucane M,Peters E,MacGregor DG.Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics.Journal of Socio-Economics. 2002;31 (4): 329-342.
40. Slovic P,Finucane M,Peters E,MacGregor DG.Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.Risk Analysis. 2004;24 (2): 311-322.
41. Small DA,Loewenstein G,Slovic P.Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007;102:143-153.
42. Swinyard WR.Shopping mall customer values: The national mall shopper and the list of values.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 1998;5 (3): 167-172.
43. Thaler RH,Sunstein CR.Libertarian paternalism.The American Economic Review. 2003;93 (2): 175-179.
44. Thaler RH,Sunstein CRNudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin; 2009:.
45. Trumbo C.Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue.Public Understanding of Science. 1996;5 (3): 269-283.
46. Viswanathan M,Childers TL.Processing of numerical and verbal product information.Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1996;5 (4): 359-385.
47. Weingart P,Engels A,Pansegrau P.Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9 (3): 261-283.
48. Weller JA,Dieckmann NF,Tusler M,Mertz CK,Burns WJ,Peters E.Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A Rasch analysis approach.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2012;:.
49. Yalch RF,Elmore-Yalch R.The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion.Journal of Consumer Research. 1984;11 (1): 522-527.