Potential conflicts between normatively-responsible advocacy and successful social influence: Evidence from persuasion effects research

Argumentation

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 151-163

  O'Keefe, Daniel J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision framing; Message framing; Pragma dialectics; Risk communication; Risk perception; Strategic maneuvering

Indexed keywords

EID: 36448931272     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9046-y     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ajzen I. 1991, The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179-211
2. Allison M. J., Keller C. 2004, Self-Efficacy Intervention Effect on Physical Activity in Older Adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research 26, 31-46
3. Bandura A. 1977, Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review 84, 191-215
4. Blok G. A., Morton J., Morley M., Kerckhoffs C. C. J. M. C., Kootstra G., van der Vleuten C. P. M. 2004, Requesting Organ Donation: The Case of Self-eEfficacy. Advances in Health Sciences Education 9, 261-282
5. Eemeren F. H. van, Houtlosser P. 2000, Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework: The Case of R. J. Reynolds. Argumentation 14, 293-305
6. Eemeren F. H. van, Houtlosser P. 2001, Managing Disagreement: Rhetorical Analysis within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework. Argumentation and Advocacy 37, 150-157
7. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2005, 'Strategic Manoeuvring', Studies in Communication Sciences, 23-34
8. Finocchiaro M. A. 1992, Asymmetries in argumentation and evaluation, in van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A., Willard C. A. (eds.) Argumentation illuminated. Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 62-72
9. Fishbein M., Yzer M. C. 2003, Using Theory to Design Effective Health Behavior Interventions. Communication Theory 13, 164-183
10. Glaeser E. L. 2006, Paternalism and Psychology. University of Chicago Law Review 73, 133-156
11. Guttman N. 1997a, Beyond Strategic Research: A Value-Centered Approach to Health Communication Interventions. Communication Theory 7, 95-124
12. Guttman N. 1997b, Ethical Dilemmas in Health Campaigns. Health Communication 9, 155-190
13. Guttman N., Ressler W. H. 2001, On Being Responsible: Ethical Issues in Appeals to Personal Responsibility in Health Campaigns. Journal of Health Communication 6, 117-136
14. Jolls C., Sunstein C. R. 2006, Debiasing through Law. Journal of Legal Studies 35, 199-241
15. Lundborg P., Lindgren B. 2002, Risk Perceptions and Alcohol Consumption among Young People. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25, 165-183
16. Lundborg P., Lindgren B. 2004, Do They Know What They Are Doing? Risk Perceptions and Smoking Behaviour among Swedish Teenagers. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28, 261-286
17. Luszcynska A. 2004, Change in Breast Self-Examination Behavior: Effects of Intervention on Enhancing Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 11, 95-104
18. McGettigan P., Sly K., O'Connell D., Hill S., Henry D. (1999), The Effects of Information Framing on the Practices of Physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14, 633-642
19. Moxey A., O'Connell D., McGettigan P., Henry D. 2003, Describing Treatment Effects to Patients: How They Are Expressed Makes a Difference. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18, 948-959
20. O'Keefe D. J. 1998, Justification Explicitness and Persuasive Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Varying Support Articulation in Persuasive Messages. Argumentation and Advocacy 35, 61-75
21. O'Keefe D. J. 1999, How to Handle Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Messages: A Meta-Analytic Review of The Effects of One-Sided and Two-Sided Messages. Communication Yearbook 22, 209-249
22. O'Keefe D. J. 2002, The persuasive effects of variation in standpoint articulation, in: van Eemeren F. H. (ed.) Advances in pragma-dialectics. Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 65-82
23. O'Keefe D. J., Jensen J. D. 2006, The Advantages of Compliance or The Disadvantages of Noncompliance? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relative Persuasive Effectiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages. Communication Yearbook 30, 1-43
24. O'Keefe, D. J. and J. D. Jensen: 'The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review'. Journal of Health Communication (in press)
25. Rothman A. J., Salovey P. 1997, Shaping Perceptions to Motivate Healthy Behavior: The Role of Message Framing. Psychological Bulletin 121, 3-19
26. Salovey P., Schneider T. R., Apanovitch A. M. 2002, Message framing in the prevention and early detection of illness, in: Dillard J. P., Pfau M. (eds.) The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 391-406
27. Trout J. D. 2005, Paternalism and Cognitive Bias. Law and Philosophy 24, 393-434
28. Van den Putte B., Dhondt G. 2005, Developing Successful Communication Strategies: A Test of an Integrated Framework for Effective Communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35, 2399-2420
29. Van den Putte B., Dhondt G. 2005, Developing Successful Communication Strategies: A Test of an Integrated Framework for Effective Communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35, 2399-2420