Analyzing the effect of homogeneous frustration in protein folding

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1727-1737

  Contessoto, Vinícius G ^a   Lima, Debora T ^a   Oliveira, Ronaldo J ^a,b   Bruni, Aline T ^c   Chahine, Jorge ^a   Leite, Vitor B P ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b BRAZILIAN CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ENERGY AND MATERIALS CNPEM   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

C alpha model; Molecular dynamics; Multivariate analysis; Structure based model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FRUSTRATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; THERMODYNAMICS; THERMOSTABILITY; TRANSITION TEMPERATURE;

C-ALPHA MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE-BASED MODEL;

LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84884205766     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24309     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Levinthal C. Mossbauer spectroscopy in biological systems. In: Debrunner P, Tsibris J, Munch E, editors. Proceedings of a meeting held at Allerton house, Monticello, Illinois. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1969. pp 22-24.
2. Leopold PE, Montal M, Onuchic JN. Protein folding funnels-a kinetic approach to the sequence structure relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;18:8721-8725.
3. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein-folding-a synthesis. Proteins 1995;21:167-195.
4. Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN, Thirumalai D. Navigating the folding routes. Science 1995;267:1619-1620.
5. Dill KA, Chan HS. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. New J Phys 1997;4:10-19.
6. Chan HS, Zhang Z, Wallin S, Liu Z. Cooperativity, local-nonlocal coupling, and non-native interactions: principles of protein folding from coarse-grained models. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2011;62:301-326.
7. Nymeyer H, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN. Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5921-5928.
8. Koga N, Takada S. Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a gö-like model. J Mol Biol 2001;313:171-180.
9. Whitford PC, Noel JK, Gosavi S, Schug A, Sanbonmatsu K, Onuchic JN. An all-atom structure-based potential for proteins: bridging minimal models with all-atom empirical forcefields. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2009;75:430-441.
10. Fersht AR. Characterizing transition states in protein folding: an essential step in the puzzle. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:79-84.
11. Garcia-Mira MM, Sadqi M, Fischer N, Sanchez-Ruiz JM, Muoz V. Experimental identification of downhill protein folding. Science 2002;298:2191-2195.
12. Nettels D, Gopich IV, Hoffmann A, Schuler B. Ultrafast dynamics of protein collapse from single-molecule photon statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:2655-2660.
13. Chung HS, Louis JM, Eaton WA. Experimental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by-photon trajectories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:11837-11844.
14. Chavez LL, Onuchic JN, Clementi C. Quantifying the roughness on the free energy landscape: entropic bottlenecks and protein folding rates. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:8426-8432.
15. Snow CD, Sorin EJ, Rhee YM, Pande VS. How well can simulation predict protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics? Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2005;34:43-69.
16. Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG. Spin-glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:7524-7528.
17. Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 1991;254:1598-1603.
18. Socci ND, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG. Diffusive dynamics of the reaction coordinate for protien folding funnels. J Chem Phys 1996;104:5860-5868.
19. Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, Luthey-Schulten Z, Socci ND. Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:3626-3630.
20. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of proteins chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
21. Onuchic JN, Nymeyer H, Garcia AE, Chahine J, Socci ND. The energy landscape theory of protein folding: insights into folding mechanisms and scenarios. Adv Protein Chem.2000;53:87-152.
22. Shakhnovich EI, Gutin AM. Formation of unique structure in polypeptide chains. Theoretical investigation with the aid of a replica approach. Biophys Chem 1989;34:187-199.
23. Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG. Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy-model (with applications to protein folding). J Phys Chem 1989;93:6902-6915.
24. Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:4918-4922.
25. Sutto L, Ltzer J, Hegler JA, Ferreiro DU, Wolynes PG. Consequences of localized frustration for the folding mechanism of the IM7 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:19825-19830.
26. Plotkin SS. Speeding protein folding beyond the Gō model: how a little frustration sometimes helps. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2001;45:337-345.
27. Clementi C, Plotkin SS. The effects of non-native interactions on protein folding rates: theory and simulation. Prot Sci 2004;13:1750-1766.
28. Zarrine-Afsar A, Wallin S, Neculai AM, Neudecker P, Howell PL, Davidson AR, Chan HS. Theoretical and experimental demonstration of the importance of specific nonnative interactions in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:9999-10004.
29. Zarrine-Afsar A, Zhang Z, Schweiker KL, Makhatadze GI, Davidson AR, Chan HS. Kinetic consequences of native state optimization of surface-exposed electrostatic interactions in the fyn SH3 domain. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2012;80:858870.
30. Shental-Bechor D, Smith MTJ, MacKenzie D, Broom A, Marcovitz A, Ghashut F, Gö C, Bralha F, Meiering EM, Levy Y. Nonnative interactions regulate folding and switching of myristoylated protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:17839-17844.
31. Ferreiro DU, Hegler JA, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:19819-19824.
32. Gosavi S, Chavez LL, Jennings PA, Onuchic JN. Topological frustration and the folding of interleukin-1 beta. J Mol Biol 2006;357:986-996.
33. Plotkin SS, Onuchic JN. Understanding protein folding with energy landscape theory. Part i: basic concepts. Q Rev Biophys 2002;35:111-167.
34. Oliveira RJ, Whitford PC, Chahine J, Wang J, Onuchic JN, Leite VBP. The origin of nonmonotonic complex behavior and the effects of nonnative interactions on the diffusive properties of protein folding. Biophys J 2010;99:600-608.
35. Wang J, Oliveira RJ, Chu X, Whitford PC, Chahine J, Han W, Wang E, Leite VBP. The topography of funneled landscapes determines the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:15763-15768.
36. Shea J, Onuchic JN, Brooks CL. Energetic frustration and the nature of the transition state in protein folding. J Chem Phys 2000;113:7663-7671.
37. Zhang Z, Chan HS. Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:2920-2925.
38. Azia A, Levy Y. Nonnative electrostatic interactions can modulate protein folding: molecular dynamics with a grain of salt. J Mol Biol 2009;393:527-542.
39. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;277:985-994.
40. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
41. Ueda Y, Taketomi H, Gō N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. I. The effects of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions. Int J Peptide Res 1975;7:445-459.
42. Sobolev V, Wade R, Vried G, Edelman M. Molecular docking using surface complementarity. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1996;25:120-129.
43. Matouschek A, Kellis JT, Serrano L, Fersht AR. Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering. Nature 1989;340:122-126.
44. Yang S, Onuchic JN, Levine H. Effective stochastic dynamics on a protein folding energy landscape. J Chem Phys 2006;125:054910-054918.
45. Best RB, Hummer G. Coordinate-dependent diffusion in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:1088-1093.
46. Chahine J, Oliveira RJ, Leite VBP, Wang J. Configuration-dependent diffusion can shift the kinetic transition state and barrier height of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:14646-14651.
47. Oliveira RJ, Whitford PC, Chahine J, Leite VBP, Wang J. Coordinate and time-dependent diffusion dynamics in protein folding. Methods 2010;52:91-98.
48. Calculate the contact order of proteins: Baker laboratory, department of biochemistry, university of Washington. URL: http://depts.washington.edu/bakerpg/contact_order/.
49. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
50. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of Two-State protein folding kinetics. Biochemistry 2000;39:11177-11183.
51. Noel JK, Whitford PC, Sanbonmatsu KY, Onuchic JN. SMOG@ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS. Nucleic Acids Research 2010.
52. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comp Chem 2005;26:1701-1718.
53. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684.
54. Ferrenberg AM, Swendsen RH. New Monte Carlo technique for studying phase transitions. Phys Rev Lett 1988;61:2635-2638.
55. Cho SS, Levy Y, Wolynes PG. P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:586-591.
56. Škrbić T, Micheletti C, Faccioli P. The role of non-native interactions in the folding of knotted proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002504.
57. Cellmer T, Henry ER, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA. Measuring internal friction of an ultrafast-folding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:18320-18325.
58. Borgia A, Wensley BG, Soranno A, Nettels D, Borgia MB, Hoffmann A, Pfeil SH, Lipman EA, Clarke J, Schuler B. Localizing internal friction along the reaction coordinate of protein folding by combining ensemble and single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy. Nat Commun 2012;3:1195.
59. Wensley BG, Kwa LG, Shammas SL, Rogers JM, Browning S, Yang Z, Clarke J. Separating the effects of internal friction and transition state energy to explain the slow, frustrated folding of spectrin domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:17795-17799.
60. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
61. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst 1987;2:37-52.
62. Beebe KR, Pell RJ, Seasholtz MB. Chemometrics: a practical guide, 1st ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1998.
63. Lavine B, Workman, JJ, Jr. Chemometrics. Anal Chem 2004;76:3365-3371.
64. Miller PJ, Miller JC. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 6th ed. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall; 2010.