Multi-scale modeling for sustainable chemical production

Biotechnology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 973-984

  Zhuang, Kai ^a   Bakshi, Bhavik R ^b   Herrgård, Markus J ^a  

^a Chalmers University of Technology   (Denmark)

^b The Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biochemicals; Life cycle analysis; Metabolic modeling; Multi scale modeling; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES; BIOCHEMICALS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; METABOLIC MODELING; MULTI-SCALE FRAMEWORKS; MULTI-SCALE MODELING; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SCALE;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; METABOLISM; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ECONOMICS;

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; BIOPROCESS; BIOREACTOR; CARBON SOURCE; CELL METABOLISM; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL PRODUCTION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FERMENTATION; FOOD INDUSTRY; HUMAN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INTEGRATION; KINETICS; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; REVIEW; SIMULATION;

BIOCHEMICALS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; METABOLIC MODELING; MULTI-SCALE MODELING; SUSTAINABILITY;

ANIMALS; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; GREEN CHEMISTRY TECHNOLOGY; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84884201769     PISSN: 18606768     EISSN: 18607314     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201200272     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Hauschild, Z., Dreyer, C., Jørgensen, A., Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective - lessons learned. CIRP Ann. - Manufacturing Technol. 2008, 57, 21-24.
2. Bakshi, B. R., The path to a sustainable chemical industry: progress and problems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2011, 1, 64-68.
3. Bozell, J. J., Feedstocks for the Future - Biorefinery Production of Chemicals from Renewable Carbon. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 2008, 36, 641-647.
4. Bozell, J. J., Petersen, G. R., Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates - US Department of Energy's "Top 10" revisited. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 539-554.
5. Lee, J. W., Kim, H. U., Choi, S., Yi, J. et al., Microbial production of building block chemicals and polymers. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 758-767.
6. Jang, Y. S., Kim, B., Shin, J. H., Choi, Y. J. et al., Bio-based production of C2-C6 platform chemicals. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2437-2459.
7. Urban, R. A., Bakshi, B. R., 1, 3-Propanediol from fossils versus biomass: A life cycle evaluation of emissions and ecological resources. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 8068-8082.
8. Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J. et al., Energy. Beneficial biofuels-the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 2009, 325, 270-271.
9. Searchinger, T. D., Biofuels and the need for additional carbon. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 024007.
10. Tonini, D., Hamelin, L., Wenzel, H., Astrup, T., Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: A consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 13521-13530.
11. Feist, A. M., Zielinski, D. C., Orth, J. D., Schellenberger, J. et al., Model-driven evaluation of the production potential for growth-coupled products of Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12, 173-186.
12. Lee, J. W., Na, D., Park, J. M., Lee, J. et al., Systems metabolic engineering of microorganisms for natural and non-natural chemicals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 536-546.
13. Zondervan, E., Nawaz, M., de Haan, A. B., Woodley, J. M. et al., Optimal design of a multi-product biorefinery system. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35, 1752-1766.
14. Baral, A., Bakshi, B. R., Smith, R. L., Assessing resource intensity and renewability of cellulosic ethanol technologies using Eco-LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 2436-2444.
15. Huang, W.-D., Percival Zhang, H., Analysis of biofuels production from sugar based on three criteria: Thermodynamics, bioenergetics, and product separation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 784-792.
16. Park, J. H., Lee, S. Y., Kim, T. Y., Kim, H. U., Application of systems biology for bioprocess development. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 404-412.
17. Skraly, F. A., Lytle, B. L., Cameron, D. C., Construction and characterization of a 1, 3-propanediol operon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 98-105.
18. Nakamura, C. E., Whited, G. M., Metabolic engineering for the microbial production of 1, 3-propanediol. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 454-459.
19. Price, N. D., Reed, J. L., Palsson, B. Ø., Genome-scale models of microbial cells: Evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 886-897.
20. Terzer, M., Maynard, N. D., Covert, M. W., Stelling, J., Genome-scale metabolic networks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2009, 1, 285-297.
21. Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., Palsson, B. O., Constraining the metabolic genotype-phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 291-305.
22. Thiele, I., Palsson, B. Ø., A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 93-121.
23. Henry, C. S., DeJongh, M., Best, A. A., Frybarger, P. M. et al., High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 977-982.
24. Reed, J. L., Vo, T. D., Schilling, C. H., Palsson, B. O., An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR). Genome Biol. 2003, 4, R54.
25. Reed, J. L., Palsson, B. Ø., Thirteen years of building constraint-based in silico models of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 2692-2699.
26. Feist, A. M., Henry, C. S., Reed, J. L., Krummenacker, M. et al., A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3, 121.
27. Förster, J., Famili, I., Fu, P., Palsson, B. Ø. et al., Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 244-253.
28. Herrgård, M. J., Swainston, N., Dobson, P., Dunn, W. B. et al., A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1155-1160.
29. Brochado, A. R., Matos, C., Møller, B. L., Hansen, J. et al., Improved vanillin production in baker's yeast through in silico design. Microb. Cell Fact. 2010, 9, 84.
30. Yim, H., Haselbeck, R., Niu, W., Pujol-Baxley, C. et al., Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1, 4-butanediol. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 445-452.
31. Hjersted, J. L., Henson, M. A., Mahadevan, R., Genome-scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fed-batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97, 1190-1204.
32. Mahadevan, R., Bond, D. R., Butler, J. E., Esteve-Nuñez, A. et al., Characterization of metabolism in the Fe(III)-reducing organism Geobacter sulfurreducens by constraint-based modeling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1558-1568.
33. Zhuang, K., Ma, E., Lovley, D. R., Mahadevan, R., The design of long-term effective uranium bioremediation strategy using a community metabolic model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2475-2483.
34. Patil, K. R., Åkesson, M., Nielsen, J., Use of genome-scale microbial models for metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15, 64-69.
35. Soh, K. C., Hatzimanikatis, V., DREAMS of metabolism. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 501-508.
36. Burgard, A. P., Pharkya, P., Maranas, C. D., Optknock: A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84, 647-657.
37. Lun, D. S., Rockwell, G., Guido, N. J., Baym, M. et al., Large-scale identification of genetic design strategies using local search. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5, 296.
38. Yang, L., Cluett, W. R., Mahadevan, R., EMILiO: A fast algorithm for genome-scale strain design. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 272-281.
39. Henry, C. S., Broadbelt, L. J., Hatzimanikatis, V., Discovery and analysis of novel metabolic pathways for the biosynthesis of industrial chemicals: 3-hydroxypropanoate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 106, 462-473.
40. Segrè, D., Vitkup, D., Church, G. M., Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 15112-15117.
41. Costanza, J., Carapezza, G., Angione, C., Lió, P. et al., Robust design of microbial strains. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 3097-3104.
42. Kacser, H, Burns, J. A. The control of flux.Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1995, 23, 341-366.
43. Wang, L., Birol, I., Hatzimanikatis, V., Metabolic control analysis under uncertainty: Framework development and case studies. Biophys. J. 2004, 87, 3750-3763.
44. Jamshidi, N., Palsson, B. Ø., Formulating genome-scale kinetic models in the post-genome Era. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 171.
45. Smallbone, K., Simeonidis, E., Swainston, N., Mendes, P., Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4, 6.
46. Mendes, P., Hoops, S., Sahle, S., Gauges, R., Dada, J., Kummer, U., Computational modeling of biochemical networks using COPASI. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 500, 17-59.
47. Bujara, M., Schümperli, M., Pellaux, R., Heinemann, M., Panke, S., Optimization of a blueprint for in vitro glycolysis by metabolic real-time analysis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 271-277.
48. Beg, Q. K., Vazquez, A., Ernst, J., de Menezes, M. A. et al., Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12663-12668.
49. Zhuang, K., Vemuri, G. N., Mahadevan, R., Economics of membrane occupancy and respiro-fermentation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 500.
50. Henry, C. S., Broadbelt, L. J., Hatzimanikatis, V., Thermodynamics-based metabolic flux analysis. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 1792-1805.
51. Liu, J., Kinetic constraints for formation of steady states in biochemical networks. Biophys. J. 2005, 88, 3212-3223.
52. Lerman, J. A., Hyduke, D. R., Latif, H., Portnoy, V. A. et al., In silico method for modelling metabolism and gene product expression at genome scale. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 929.
53. Varma, A., Palsson, B. O., Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 3724-3731.
54. Mahadevan, R., Edwards, J. S., Doyle, F. J., Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 2002, 83, 1331-1340.
55. Monod, J., The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1949, 1, 371-394.
56. Anesiadis, N., Cluett, W. R., Mahadevan, R., Dynamic metabolic engineering for increasing bioprocess productivity. Metab. Eng. 2008, 10, 255-266.
57. Salimi, F., Zhuang, K., Mahadevan, R., Genome-scale metabolic modeling of a clostridial co-culture for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 726-738.
58. Zhuang, K., Izallalen, M., Mouser, P., Richter, H. et al., Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments. ISME J. 2011, 5, 305-316.
59. Zhuang, K., Yang, L., Cluett, R., Mahadevan, R., Dynamic strain scanning optimization: An efficient strain design strategy for balanced yield, titer, and productivity. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 8.
60. Biegler, L. T., Grossmann, I. E., Westerberg, A. W. (Ed.), Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design. Prentice Hall, 1997.
61. Martín, M., Grossmann, I. E., Energy optimization of bioethanol production via hydrolysis of switchgrass. AIChE J. 2012, 58, 1538-1549.
62. Morales-Rodriguez, R., Meyer, A. S., Gernaey, K. V., Sin, G., A framework for model-based optimization of bioprocesses under uncertainty: Lignocellulosic ethanol production case. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 42, 115-129.
63. Al-sharrah, K., Hankinson, G., Elkamel, A., Decision-making for petrochemical planning using multiobjective and strategic tools. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2006, 84, 1019-1030.
64. Sokic, M., Stevancevic, D., The optimal structure of the system of the petrochemical industry. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1983, 38, 265-273.
65. Fathi-Afshar, S., Yang, J. C., Designing the optimal structure of the petrochemical industry for minimum cost and least gross toxicity of chemical production. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1985, 40, 781-797.
66. Al-Sharrah, G., Elkamel, A., Almanssoor, A., Sustainability indicators for decision-making and optimisation in the process industry: The case of the petrochemical industry. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 1452-1461.
67. Palsson, B. O., Fathi-Afshar, S., Rudd, D. F., Lightfoot, E. N., Biomass as a source of chemical feedstocks: An economic evaluation. Science 1981, 213, 513-517.
68. Werpy, T., Petersen, G., Aden, A., Bozell, J. et al., Top Value Added Chemicals from Biomass, Volume 1 - Results OF Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas. 2004, Oak Ridge, TN: US Department of Energy.
69. Christensen, C. H., Rass-Hansen, J., Marsden, C. C., Taarning, E. et al., The renewable chemicals industry. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 283-289.
70. Guinée, J. B., Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J LCA 2002, 7, 311-313.
71. Curran, M. A. (Ed.), Life cycle assessment handbook: A guide for environmentally sustainable products, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
72. Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J. et al., Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 91, 1-21.
73. Kim, S., Dale, B. E., Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: Bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 29, 426-439.
74. Lenzen, M., Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories. J. Ind. Ecol. 2000, 4, 127-148.
75. Leontief, W. (Ed.), Input-output economics, Oxford University Press, 1986.
76. Miller, R. E., Blair, P. D. (Ed.), Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
77. Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., Lave, L., Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 184A-191A.
78. Wiedmann, T., A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 211-222.
79. Zhang, Y., Singh, S., Bakshi, B. R., Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2232-2242.
80. Zhang, Y., Baral, A., Bakshi, B. R., Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: Toward an ecologically based LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2624-2631.
81. Diwekar, U., Shastri, Y., Design for environment: A state-of-the-art review. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2011, 13, 227-240.
82. Becker, S. A., Feist, A. M., Mo, M. L., Hannum, G. et al., Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: The COBRA Toolbox. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 727-738.
83. Schellenberger, J., Que, R., Fleming, R. M., Thiele, I. et al., Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: The COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 1290-1307.
84. Rocha, I., Maia, P., Evangelista, P., Vilaa, P., Soares, S., Pinto, J. P., Nielsen, J., Patil, K. R., Ferreira, E. C., Rocha, M., OptFlux: An open-source software platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4, 45.