Genome-scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fed-batch culture

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1190-1204

  Hjersted, Jared L ^a   Henson, Michael A ^a   Mahadevan, Radhakrishnan ^b  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dynamic flux balance analysis; Fed batch culture; Genome scale metabolic network; Metabolic engineering; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CELL CULTURE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ETHANOL; METABOLISM;

DYNAMIC FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; FED-BATCH CULTURE; GENOME-SCALE METABOLIC NETWORK; METABOLIC ENGINEERING;

YEAST;

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FED BATCH CULTURE; FUNGAL METABOLISM; GENE INSERTION; GENOME ANALYSIS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOREACTORS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ETHANOL; GLUCOSE; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; XYLOSE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 34447308322     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21332     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Åkesson M, Forster J, Nielsen J. 2004. Integration of gene expression data into genome-scale metabolic models. Metabol Eng 6:285-293.
2. Aristidou A, Penttila M. 2000. Metabolic engineering applications to renewable resource utilization. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:187-198.
3. Bro C, Regenberg B, Forster J, Nielsen J. 2006. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metabolic Eng 8:102-111.
4. Burgard AP, Maranas CD. 2001. Probing the performance limits of the Escherichia coli metabolic network subject to gene additions or deletions. Biotechnol Bioeng 74:364-375.
5. Covert MW, Schilling CH, Palsson BO. 2001. Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of metabolism. J Theor Biol 213: 73-88.
6. Duarte NC, Herrgard MJ, Palsson BO. 2004. Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res 14:1298-1309.
7. Famili I, Forster J, Nielsen J, Palsson BO. 2003. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13134-13139.
8. Forster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BO, Nielsen J. 2003. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 13:244-253.
9. Gadkar KP, Doyle FJ III, Edwards JS, Mahadevan R. 2004. Estimating optimal profiles of genetic alterations using constraint-based models. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:243-251.
10. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Veronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre B, Arkin AP, Astromoff A, Bakkoury ME, Bangham R, Benito R, Brachat S, Campanaro S, Curtiss M, Davis K, Deutschbauer A, Entian KD, Flaherty P, Foury F, Garfinkel DJ, Gerstein M, Gotte D, Güldener U, Hegemann JH, Hempel S, Herman Z, Jaramillo DF, Kelly DE, Kelly SL, Kötter P, LaBonte D, Lamb DC, Lan N, Liang H, Liao H, Liu L, Luo C, Lussier M, Mao R, Menard P, Ooi SL, Revuelta JL, Roberts CJ, Rose M, Ross-Macdonald P, Scherens B, Schimmack G, Shafer B, Shoemaker DD, Sookhai-Mahadeo S, Storms RK, Strathern JN, Valle G, Voet M, Volckaert G, Wang C, Ward TR, Wilhelmy J, Winzeler EA, Yang Y, Yen G, Youngman E, Yu K, Bussey H, Boeke JD, Snyder M, Philippsen P, Davis RW, Johnston M. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
11. Hatzimanikatis V, Emmerling M, Sauer U, Bailey JE. 1998. Application of mathematical tools for metabolic design of microbial ethanol production. Biotech Bioeng 58:154-161.
12. Hjersted JL, Henson MA. 2006. Optimization of fed-batch Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation using dynamic flux balance models. Biotechnol Prog 22:1239-1248.
13. Jeffries TW, Jin YS. 2004. Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of pentoses by yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:495-509.
14. Jones KD, Kompala DS. 1999. Cybernetic modeling of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. J Biotech 71:105-131.
15. Kanehisa M. 1997. A database for post-genome analysis. Trends Genet 13:375-376.
16. Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27-30.
17. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Araki M, Hirakawa M. 2006. From genomics to chemical genomics: New developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 34:354-357.
18. Kauffman KJ, Prakash P, Edwards JS. 2003. Advances in metabolic flux analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:491-496.
19. Kuyper M, Toirkens MJ, Diderich JA, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. 2005. Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res 5:925-934.
20. Lawson JE, Gawaz M, Klingenberg M, Douglas MG. 1990. Structure-function studies of adenine nucleotide transport in mitochondria. I. Construction and genetic analysis of yeast mutants encoding the ADP/ATP carrier protein of mitochondria. J Biol Chem 265:14195-14201.
21. Lee S, Phalakornkule C, Domach MM, Grossmann IE. 2000. Recursive MILP model for finding all the alternate optima in LP models for metabolic networks. Comput Chem Eng 24:711-716.
22. Mahadevan R, Schilling CH. 2003. Effects of alternate optima on constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. Metabolic Eng 5:264-276.
23. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ III. 2002. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys J 83:1331-1340.
24. Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 1994. Bioreaction engineering principles. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
25. Ostergaard S, Olsson L, Nielsen J. 2000. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:34-50.
26. Pharkya P, Burgard AP, Maranas CD. 2004. OptStrain: A computational framework for redesign of microbial production systems. Genome Res 14:2367-2376.
27. Reed JL, Famili I, Thiele I, Palsson BO. 2006. Towards multidimensional genome annotation. Nature Rev Genet 7:130-141.
28. Sainz J, Pizarro F, Perez-Correa FR, Agosin E. 2003. Modeling of yeast metabolism and process dynamics in batch fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:818-828.
29. Sauer U, Hatzimanikatis V, Hohmann HP, Manneberg M, van Loon AP, Bailey JE. 1996. Physiology and metabolic fluxes of wild-type and riboflavin-producing Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3687-3696.
30. Segre D, Vitkup D, Church GM. 2002. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15112-15117.
31. Sonnleitner B, Kappeli O. 1986. Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiratory capacity: Formulation and verification of a hypothesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:927-937.
32. Steinmeyer DE, Shuler ML. 1989. Structured model for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem Eng Sci 44:2017-2030.
33. Stephanopoulos GN, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J. 1998. Metabolic engineering: Principles and methodologies. New York: Academic Press.
34. Varma A, Palsson BO. 1994. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3724-3731.
35. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. 1999. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective. 1. Theoretical preliminaries. Biotechnol Prog 15:407-425.
36. Vaseghi S, Baumeister A, Rizzi M, Reuss M. 1999. In vivo dynamics of the pentose phosphate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metabolic Eng 1:128-140.