Diabetes prevention, health information technology, and meaningful use: Challenges and opportunities

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 4 SUPPL.4, 2013, Pages

  Ahmad, Faraz S ^a   Tsang, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICARE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WELLBEING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; LEGAL ASPECT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT; CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (U.S.); DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884190205     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. CDC. Diabetes report card 2012. Atlanta GA: CDC, DHHS, 2012.
2. Thorpe KE The Affordable Care Act lays the groundwork for a national diabetes prevention and treatment strategy. Health Aff 2012; 31(1): 61-6.
3. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future o fhealth information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29(4): 614-21.
4. Bitton A, Flier LA, Jha AK. Health information technologyinthe era of care delivery reform: to what end? JAMA 2012; 307(24): 2593-4.
5. Leventhal T, Taliaferro JP, Wong K, Hughes C, Mun S. The patient-centered medical home and health information technology. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18(2): 145-9.
6. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the U.S. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(13): 1400-5. (Pubitemid 47052439)
7. Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Albert NM, et al. Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. Am Heart J 2010; 159(4): 635-642.e1.
8. Walsh MN, Albert NM, Curtis AB, et al. Lack of association between electronic health record systems and improvement in use of evidence-based heart failure therapies in outpatient cardiology practices. Clin Cardiol 2012; 35(3): 187-96.
9. McCormick D, Bor DH, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Giving office-based physicians electronic access to patients' prior imaging and lab results did not deter ordering of tests. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31(3): 488-96.
10. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293(10): 1197-203. (Pubitemid 40327905)
11. Ash JS Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. JAMA 2003; 11(2): 104-12. (Pubitemid 38327498)
12. Himmelstein DU, Wright A, Woolhandler S. Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: anational study. JAMA 2010; 123(1): 40-6.
13. Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA, et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. JAMA 2009; 16(4): 457-64.
14. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998; 280(15): 1311-6. (Pubitemid 28473716)
15. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(10): 742-52. (Pubitemid 46780634)
16. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems onmedication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(12): 1409-16. (Pubitemid 36758913)
17. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, et al. Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff 2010; 29(4): 639-46.
18. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff 2011; 30(3): 464-71.
19. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. Costs and bene-fits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28(2): w282-w293.
20. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(15): 1477-9.
21. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(5): 382-5.
22. Bipartisan Policy Center Task Force on Delivery System Reform and Health IT. Transforming health care: the role of health IT. Bipartisan Policy Cente; 2012: 1-48.
23. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program - Stage 2. Federal Register; 2012.
24. Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, et al. Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs achieving meaningful use of health IT. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172(9): 731-6.
25. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare & Medicaid EHR incentive program: meaningful use Stage 1 requirements summary. 2010: 1-23.
26. Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med 2011; 365(9): 825-33.
27. Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Cohen DJ, Clark EC, Crabtree BF. Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10(3): 221-7.
28. Reed M, Huang J, Graetz I, et al. Outpatient electronic health records and the clinical care and outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157(7): 482-9.
29. Bowens FM, Frye PA, Jones WA. Health information technology: integration of clinical workflow into meaningful use of electronic health records. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2010; 7: 1d.
30. Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Hahn KA, et al. Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5(3): 209-15. (Pubitemid 46889997)
31. Costa BM, Fitzgerald KJ, Jones KM, Dunning Am T. Effectiveness of IT-based diabetes management interventions: areview of the literature. BMC Fam Pract 2009; 10(1): 72.
32. Mohammed K Ali SSNT. Databases for diabetes epidemiology: review of electronic decision-support tools for diabetes care: a viable option for low- and middle-income countries? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5(3): 553-70.
33. Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, et al. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(3): 750-7. (Pubitemid 36929339)
34. Montori VM, Dinneen SF, Gorman CA, et al. The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(11): 1952-7. (Pubitemid 41071050)
35. O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, et al. Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9(1): 12-21.
36. Holbrook A, Thabane L, Keshavjee K, et al. Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. Can Med Assoc J 2009; 181(1-2): 37-44.
37. Berikai P, Meyer PM, Kazlauskaite R, Savoy B, Kozik K, Fogelfeld L. Gain in patients' knowledge of diabetes management targets is associated with better glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2007; 30(6): 1587-9. (Pubitemid 46871178)
38. Holtz B, Lauckner C. Diabetes management via mobile phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18(3): 175-84.
39. Chomutare T, Fernandez-Luque L, Arsand E, Hartvigsen G. Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13(3): e65.
40. Grant RW, Wald JS, Schnipper JL, et al. Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(16): 1776-82.
41. Balas EA, Krishna S, Kretschmer RA, Cheek TR, Lobach DF, Boren SA. Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care. Med Care 2004; 42(6): 610-21.
42. Quinn CC, Clough SS, Minor JM, Lender D, Okafor MC, Gruber-Baldini A. WellDoc™ mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10(3): 160-8. (Pubitemid 351677598)
43. Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, et al. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically III, and under-served. Rockville MD: Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments; 2008.
44. DHHS. National strategy for quality improvement in health care. HealthCare.gov. 2011. www.healthcare.gov/law/resources/reports/ nationalqualitystrategy032011.pdf.
45. Hussain A, Claussen B, Ramachandran A, Williams R. Prevention of type 2 diabetes: a review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 76(3): 317-26. (Pubitemid 46505039)
46. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity in the U.S., 2009-2010. NCHS Data Brief 2012; (82): 1-8.
47. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(6): 393-403.
48. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet 2009; 374(9702): 1677-86.
49. Krumholz HM, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Chen J, Heiat A, Marciniak TA. National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 1998; 280(7): 623-9.
50. Lee TH Eulogy for a quality measure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(12): 1175-7. (Pubitemid 47443176)
51. Parsons A, McCullough C, Wang J, Shih S. Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19(4): 604-9.
52. Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2010; 67(5): 503-27.
53. Weiner JP, Fowles JB, Chan KS. New paradigms for measuring clinical performance using electronic health records. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24(3): 200-5.
54. Lenert L, Sundwall DN. Public health surveillance and meaningful use regulations: a crisis of opportunity. Am J Public Health 2012; 102(3): e1-e7.
55. Hsiao C-J, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: U.S., 2001-2011. NCHS Data Brief 2011; (79): 1-8.
56. Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, Woodwell D, Palso K, Rechtsteiner E. Physician adoption of electronic health record systems: U.S., 2011. Hyattesville MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2012.
57. Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9785): 49-55.
58. American Diabetes Association. American Diabetes Association advising on the use of information technology to improve diabetes prevention, Management in Beacon Communities. diabetes.org. 2011. www.diabetes.org/for-media/2011/Beacon- Press-Release-2011.html.
59. Rein A, Kennedy H, De Coudres B, Cohen RS, Sabharwal R, Fairbrother G. Evaluation design and technical assistance opportunities: early findings from the Beacon Community Program evaluation teams. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2012; 1: 1-22.
60. Asch DA, Muller RW, Volpp KG. Automated hovering inhealth care - watching over the 5000 hours. N Engl J Med 2012; 367(1): 1-3.
61. Long JA, Jahnle EC, Richardson DM, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156(6): 416-24.
62. Baig AA, Wilkes AE, Davis AM, et al. The use of quality improvement and health information technology approaches to improve diabetes outcomes in African American and Hispanic patients. Med Care Res Rev 2010; 67(5S): 163S-197S.