Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 604-609

  Parsons, Amanda ^a   McCullough, Colleen ^a   Wang, Jason ^a   Shih, Sarah ^a  

^a NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HABIT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDITY; WORKFLOW;

ADULT; BENCHMARKING; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84865174655     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000557     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Blumenthal D. Promoting use of health IT: why be a meaningful user? Md Med 2010;11:18-19.
2. CMS Office of Public Affairs. Fact Sheet. Details for Medicare and Medicaid Health Information Technology: Title IV of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. 2009. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/factsheet.asp?Counter=3466&intNumPerPage=10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=1&numDays=3500&srchOpt=0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType=6&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date (accessed 18 Aug 2011).
3. Frieden TR, Mostashari F. Health care as if health mattered. JAMA 2008;299:950-2.
4. Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, et al. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:844-50.
5. Tang PC, Ralston M, Arrigotti MF, et al. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:10-15.
6. Roski J, McClellan M. Measuring health care performance now, not tomorrow: essential steps to support effective health reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:682-9.
7. Kahn M, Ranade D. The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:185-91.
8. Chan K, Fowles J, Weiner J. Electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:503-27.
9. Galanter WL, Hier DB, Jao C, et al. Computerized physician order entry of medications and clinical decision support can improve problem list documentation compliance. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:332-8.