Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care

Medical Care

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 610-621

  Balas, E Andrew ^a   Krishna, Santosh ^a   Kretschmer, Rainer A ^c   Cheek, Thomas R ^b   Lobach, David F ^d   Boren, Suzanne Austin ^b  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic disease; Computerized; Diabetes; Knowledge; Metaanalysis

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; INSULIN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DRUG THERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMINDER SYSTEM; SELF CARE; TELEMETRY;

BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; INSULIN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SELF CARE; TELEMETRY; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 2942683403     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000128008.12117.f8     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;81:383-396.
2. American Diabetes Association. Eye care guidelines for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:745-746.
3. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). State of Managed Care Quality-1999: Selected National Averages 1996-1998. Available at: URL: nttp://www.ncqa.org/pages/communications/news/99avgs.html. Accessed: January 2002.
4. Zoorob RJ, Mainous AGd. Practice patterns of rural family physicians based on the American Diabetes Association standards of care. J Community Health. 1996;21:175-182.
5. Beckles GL, Engelgau MM, Venkat Narayan KM, et al. Population-based assessment of the level of care among adults with diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1432-1438.
6. American Diabetes Association. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917-932.
7. American Diabetes Association. Basic Diabetes Information. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/ Accessed April 22, 2003.
8. Weed LL. New connections between medical knowledge and patient care. BMJ. 1997;315:231-235.
9. Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851-1857.
10. Balas EA, Austin SM, Ewigman BG, et al. Methods of randomized controlled clinical trials in health services research. Med Care. 1995;33: 687-699.
11. Balas EA, Austin SM, Brown GD, et al. Quality Evaluation of Controlled Clinical Information Service Trials. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care; 1993:586-590.
12. Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282:1054-1060.
13. Petitti DB. Meta-analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
14. Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, et al. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1995;14:395-411.
15. Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team. Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation. BMJ. 1994;308:1208-1212.
16. Hurwitz B, Goodman C, Yudkin J. Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care. BMJ. 1993;306:624-630.
17. Lobach DF, Hammond WE. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Am J Med. 1997;102:89-98.
18. Lobach DF, Hammond WE. Development and Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): Improved Compliance With Care Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care; 1994:787-791.
19. Lobach DF. Electronically Distributed, Computer-Generated, Individualized Feedback Enhances the Use of a Computerized Practice Guideline. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Fall Symposium; 1996:493-497.
20. Mazzuca SA, Vinicor F, Einterz RM, et al. Effects of the clinical environment on physicians' response to postgraduate medical education. American Educational Research Journal. 1990;27:473-488.
21. Me Donald CJ. Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. Ann Intern Med. 1976;84:162-167.
22. Moore AC. Evaluation of an Automated Ambulatory Medical Record System [Dissertation]. Houston School of Public Health, University of Texas; 1980.
23. Nilasena DS, Lincoln MJ. A Computer-Generated Reminder System Improves Physician Compliance With Diabetes Preventive Care Guidelines. Proceedings of- the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care; 1995:640-645.
24. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou XH, et al. A randomized trial of 'corollary orders' to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:364-375.
25. Ahring KK, Ahring JP, Joyce C, et al. Telephone modem access improves diabetes control in those with insulin-requiring diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:971-975.
26. Billiard A, Rohmer V, Roques MA, et al. Telematic transmission of computerized blood glucose profiles for IDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:130-134.
27. Cavan DA, Hejlesen OK, Hovorka R, et al. Preliminary experience of the DIAS computer model in providing insulin dose advice to patients with insulin dependent diabetes. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1998;56:157-164.
28. Chiarelli F, Tumini S, Morgese G, et al. Controlled study in diabetic children comparing insulin-dosage adjustment by manual and computer algorithms. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:1080-1084.
29. Danne T, Engelmann E, Weber B. A controlled cross-over trial of an insulin dosage computer based on urine glucose measurements in young children with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 1992;5:55-60.
30. di Biase N, Napoli A, Sabbatini A, et al. Telemedicine in the treatment of diabetic pregnancy. Annali dell Istituto Superiore di Sanita. 1997;33: 347-351.
31. Hayes JR. Controlling Glucose Levels of Adolescents With Diabetes Through the Use of a Voice Processing System [Dissertation]. Ohio State University. 1996;57:3154.
32. Hejlesen OK, Andreassen S, Frandsen NE, et al. Using a double blind controlled clinical trial to evaluate the function of a diabetes advisory system: a feasible approach? Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1998; 56:165-173.
33. Marrero DG, Kronz KK, Golden MP, et al. Clinical evaluation of computer-assisted self-monitoring of blood glucose system. Diabetes Care. 1989;12:345-350.
34. Marrero DG, Vandagriff JL, Kronz K, et al. Using telecommunication technology to manage children with diabetes: the Computer-Linked Outpatient Clinic (CLOC) Study. Diabetes Educator. 1995;21:313-319.
35. Matsuyama JR, Mason BJ, Jue SG. Pharmacists' interventions using an electronic medication-event monitoring device's adherence data versus pill counts. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:851-855.
36. Mease A, Whitlock WL, Brown A, et al. Telemedicine improved diabetic management. Mil Med. 2000;165:579-584.
37. Morrish NJ, Cohen DL, Hicks B, et al. A controlled study of the effect of computer-aided analysis of home blood glucose monitoring on blood glucose control. Diabet Med. 1989;6:591-594.
38. Peters A, Rubsamcn M, Jacob U, et al. Clinical evaluation of decision support system for insulin-dose adjustment in IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:875-880.
39. Peters A, Kerner W. [Analytic design and clinical application of an intelligent control system for pharmacotherapy with insuIin-2]. Biomedizinische Technik. 1996;41:42-53.
40. Peterson CM, Jovanovic L, Chanoch LH. Randomized trial of computerassisted insulin delivery in patients with type I diabetes beginning pump therapy. Am J Med. 1986;81:69-72.
41. Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, et al. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a department of veterans affairs health care system. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:202-208.
42. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, et al. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med. 2000;108:20-27.
43. Rivellese AA, Ventura MM, Vespasiani G, et al. Evaluation of new computerized method for recording 7-day food intake in IDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:602-604.
44. Rosenfalck AM, Bendtson I. The Diva System, a computerized diary, used in young type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 1993;19:25-29.
45. Ryff-de Leche A, Engler H, et al. Clinical application of two computerized diabetes management systems: comparison with the log-book method. Diabetes Res. 1992;19:97-105.
46. Schrezenmeir J, Achterberg H, Bergeler J, et al. Controlled study on the use of hand-held insulin dosage computers enabling conversion to and optimizing of meal-related insulin therapy regimens. Life Support Systems. 1985;3:561-567.
47. Shultz EK, Bauman A, Hayward M, et al. Improved care of patients with diabetes through telecommunications. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1992;670:141-145.
48. Tsang MW, Mok M, Kam G, et al. Improvement in diabetes control with a monitoring system based on a hand-held, touch-screen electronic diary. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7:47-50.
49. Turnin MC, Beddok RH, Clottes JP, et al. Telematic expert system Diabeto. New tool for diet self-monitoring for diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:204-212.
50. Bloomfield S, Calder JE, Chisholm V, et al. A project in diabetes education for children. Diabet Med. 1990;7:137-142.
51. Brown SJ, Lieberman DA, Germeny B A, et al. Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Med Inform. 1997;22:77-89.
52. Glasgow RE, La Chance PA, Toobert DJ, et al. Long-term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient Education and Counseling. 1997;32:175-184.
53. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE. Effects of a brief office-based intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self-management. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:835-842.
54. Horan PP, Yarborough MC, Besigel G, et al. Computer-assisted self-control of diabetes by adolescents. Diabetes Educator. 1990;16:205-211.
55. Kim J-yL, Phillips TL. The effectiveness of two forms of corrective feedback in diabetes education. Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 1991;18:14-18.
56. Lo R, Lo B, Wells E, et al. The development and evaluation of a computer-aided diabetes education program. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996;13:19-27.
57. Sheldon AW. Computer-Assisted Diet and Exercise Training in the Behavioral Treatment of Type I Diabetes [Dissertation]. University of Miami; 1996.
58. Smith L, Weinert C. Telecommunication support for rural women with diabetes. Diabetes Educator. 2000;26:645-655.
59. Wheeler L, Wheeler R, Ours P, et al. Use of CAI/Video in Diabetes Patient Nutritional Education. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1983:961-964.
60. Wheeler LA, Wheeler ML, Ours P, et al. Evaluation of computer-based diet education in persons with diabetes mellitus and limited educational background. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:537-544.
61. Wise PH, Dowlatshahi DC, Farrant S, et al. Effect of computer-based learning on diabetes knowledge and control. Diabetes Care. 1986;9: 504-508.
62. Soeken KL, Sripusanapan A. Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis. Nurs Res. 2003;52:57-60.
63. Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, et al. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. Stat Methods Med Res. 2000;9:421-445.
64. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465.
65. Montgomery A A, Fahey T. A systematic review of the use of computers in the management of hypertension. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:520-525.
66. Balas EA, Boren SA, Griffing G. Computerized management of diabetes: a synthesis of controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5(suppl):295-299.
67. Montani S, Bellazzi R, Quaglini S, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of the use of computer-based systems on the metabolic control of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001;3:347-356.
68. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, et al. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280:1339-1346.