Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 181, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 37-44

  Holbrook, Anne ^a,d   Thabane, Lehana ^a   Keshavjee, Karim ^b   Dolovich, Lisa ^a   Bernstein, Bob ^c   Chan, David ^a   Troyan, Sue ^a   Foster, Gary ^a   Gerstein, Hertzel ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b InfoClin   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d CENTRE FOR EVALUATION OF MEDICINES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ALBUMIN; CHOLESTEROL; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; GLIBENCLAMIDE; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; INFLUENZA VACCINE; INSULIN; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; METFORMIN; ORAL ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ALBUMINURIA; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY MASS; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CHRONIC DISEASE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC FOOT; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; TIME;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67651156329     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081272     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. National diabetes statistics 2007. Bethesda (MD): National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse; 2008. Available: http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/ pubs/statistics/#14 (accessed 2009 Jan. 21).
2. The prevalence and costs of diabetes. Toronto (ON): Canadian Diabetes Association. Available: www.diabetes.ca/about-diabetes/what/prevalence/ (accessed 2009 Jan. 21).
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2007. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl 1):S4-41.
4. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) [published erratum in Lancet 1999;354:602]. Lancet 1998;352:837-53.
5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 [published erratum in BMJ 1999;318:29]. BMJ 1998;317:703-13.
6. Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, et al.; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF heart protection study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:2005-16.
7. Canadian Diabetes Association. 2003 clinical practice guidelines. Toronto (ON): The Association; 2003. Available: www.diabetes.ca/cpg2003/ (accessed 2009 Jan. 21).
8. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, et al. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:580-91.
9. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA 2004;291:335-42.
10. Brown LC, Johnson JA, Majumdar SR, et al. Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis. CMAJ 2004;171:1189-92.
11. Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W, et al. Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:427-38.
12. Ellis SE, Speroff T, Dittus RS, et al. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Couns 2004;52:97-105.
13. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al. Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(4 Suppl):39-66.
14. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(1):CD001481.
15. van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, et al. Provider - patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2003;51:17-28.
16. Branger PJ, van't Hooft A, van der Wouden JC, et al. Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care. Int J Med Inform 1999;53:133-42.
17. Smith S, Bury G, O'Leary M, et al. The North Dublin randomized controlled trial of structured diabetes shared care. Fam Pract 2004;21:39-45.
18. Smith SM, Allwright S, O'Dowd T. Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(3):CD004910.
19. Davis K, Schoen C, Schoenbaum SC, et al. Mirror, mirror on the wall: an international update on the comparative performance of American health care. New York (NY): The Commonwealth Fund; 2007. Available: www.commonwealthfund.org/ publications/publications-show.htm?doc-id=482678 (accessed 2009 Apr. 24).
20. Keshavjee K. EMR implementation in Ontario. Position paper to increase the deployment of electronic medical records in Ontario. Toronto (ON): InfoClin Inc.; 2007. Available: http://blog.canadianemr.ca /Articles /Intel-InfoClin-EMR- White-Paper -Final -080125.pdf (accessed 2009 Apr. 24).
21. Balas EA, Krishna S, Kretschmer RA, et al. Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care. Med Care 2004;42:610-21.
22. Griffin S, Kinmonth AL. Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000541.
23. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
24. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Clasification of Diabetes Mellitus. American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002;25 Suppl 1:S1-S147.
25. COMPETE II extended core dataset. Hamilton (ON): Centre for the Evaluation of Medicines; 2002. Available: www.compete-study.com/C2-dataset.htm (accessed 2009 Jan. 21).
26. Dolovich LR, Nair KM, Ciliska DK, et al. The Diabetes Continuity of Care Scale: the development and initial evaluation of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care from the patient perspective. Health Soc Care Community 2004;12:475-87.
27. Ware JE, Kosiniski M, Turner-Bowker DM, et al. How to score version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey (with a suppliment documenting version 1). Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Incorporated; 2002.
28. Boyer JG, Earp JA. The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes. Diabetes-39. Med Care 1997;35:440-53.
29. Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Fitzpatrick R. Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review. Diabet Med 2002;19:1-11.
30. Mollon B, Holbrook AM, Keshavjee K, et al. Automated telephone reminder messages can assist electronic diabetes care. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:32-6.
31. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Bayes and multiple imputation. In: Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 2002. p. 200-2.
32. Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P. Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2007;334:127-9.
33. Nair KM, Dolovich LR, Ciliska DK, et al. The perception of continuity of care from the perspective of patients with diabetes. Fam Med 2005;37:118-24.
34. Shcherbatykh I, Holbrook A, Thabane L, et al. Methodologic issues in health informatics trials: the complexities of complex interventions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:575-80.
35. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu SY, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52.
36. Mollon B, Chong J, Holbrook A, et al. Factors determining the success of computerized decision support in prescribing: a systematic review. Can J Clin Pharmacol 2007;14:e130.
37. Bowker SL, Majumdar SR, Johnson JA. Systematic review of indicators and measurements used in controlled studies of quality improvement for type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2005;29:230-8.