A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: The MGH diabetes primary care improvement project

Diabetes Care

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 750-757

  Meigs, James B ^a,b   Cagliero, Enrico ^a   Dubey, Anil ^a   Murphy Sheehy, Patricia ^a   Gildesgame, Catharyn ^a   Chueh, Henry ^a   Barry, Michael J ^a   Singer, Daniel E ^a   Nathan, David M ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; ORAL ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT CLINICS, HOSPITAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK FACTORS; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0041592705     PISSN: 01495992     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.750     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Nelson DE, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, Marks JS: Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998. Diabetes Care 23:1278-1283, 2000
2. Nathan DM, Meigs JB, Singer DE: The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: how sweet it is, or is it? Lancet 350 (Suppl. 1):4-9, 1997
3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients is affected by complications but not by intensive policies to improve blood glucose or blood pressure control (UKPDS 37). Diabetes Care 22:1125-1136, 1999
4. Harris MI: Ambulatory medical care for diabetes. In Diabetes in America: Diabetes Data Compiled 1984. Group NDD. Washington, DC, US Govt. Printing Office, 1985 (NIH publ. no. 85-1468)
5. American Diabetes Association: Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the US in 1997. Diabetes Care 21:296-309, 1998
6. Singer D, Nathan D, Fogel H, Schachat A: Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 116:660-671, 1992
7. Litzelman DK, Slemenda CW, Langefeld CD, Hayes LM, Welch MA, Bild DE, Ford ES, Vinicor F: Reduction of lower extremity clinical abnormalities in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 119:36-41, 1993
8. Meigs JB: Cardiovascular disease risk and evidence-based risk reduction in type 2 diabetes. Clin Geriatr Med 8:109-117, 2000
9. American Diabetes Association: Clinical practice recommendations 1998. Diabetes Care 21 (Suppl. 1):S1-S98, 1998
10. National Cholesterol Education Program: Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Washington, DC, US Govt. Printing Office, 1993 (NIH publ. no. 93-3095)
11. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 157:2413-2446, 1997
12. Health Care Financing Administration: Quality of care: national projects: Diabetes Quality Improvement Project (DQIP) [article online], 2000. Available from hnp://www.dqip.org
13. Meigs JB, Stafford RS: Cardiovascular disease prevention practices by U.S. physicians for patients with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 15:220-228, 2000
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Levels of diabetes-related preventive-care practices: United States, 1997-1999. MMWR 49:954-958, 2000
15. Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM: Changing physicians' practices. N Engl J Med 329:1271-1274, 1993
16. Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, Oxman A, Thomson M: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317:465-468, 1998
17. Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S, Smith K: Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 280:1339-1346, 1998
18. Friedman NM, Gleeson JM, Kent MJ, Foris M, Rodriguez DJ, Cypress M: Management of diabetes mellitus in the Lovelace Health Systems' EPISODES OF CARE program. Eff Clin Pract 1:5-11, 1998
19. Petitti DB, Contreras R, Ziel FH, Dudl J, Domurat ES, Hyatt JA: Evaluation of the effect of performance monitoring and feedback on care process, utilization, and outcome. Diabetes Care 23:192-196, 2000
20. Wagner EH, Grothhaus LC, Sandhu N, Galvin MS, McGregor M, Artz K, Coleman EA: Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care 25:695-700, 2001
21. Aubert R, Herman W, Waters J, Moore W, Sutton D, Peterson B, Bailey C, Koplan J: Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med 129:605-612, 1998
22. Clark CM Jr, Snyder JW, Meek RL, Stutz LM, Parkin CG: A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care environment improves diabetes outcomes and patient satisfaction. Diabetes Care 24:1079-1086, 2001
23. Peters AL, Davidson MB: Application of a diabetes managed care program: the feasibility of using nurses and a computer system to provide effective care. Diabetes Care 21:1037-1043, 1998
24. Sidorov J, Shull R, Tomcavage J, Girolami S, Lawton N, Harris R: Does diabetes disease management save money and improve outcomes: a report of simultaneous short-term savings and quality improvement associated with a health maintenance organization-sponsored disease management program among patients fulfilling health employer data and information set criteria. Diabetes Care 25:684-689, 2002
25. Rabbani U, Morgan M, Barnett O: A COSTAR interface using WWW technology. Proc AMIA Symp 703-707, 1998
26. Beach ML: Primer on group randomized trials. Eff Clin Pract 4:42-43, 2001
27. Dubey AK, Chueh H: Using the extensible markup language (XML) in automated clinical practice guidelines. Proc AMIA Symp 735-739, 1998
28. Dubey AK, Chueh HC: An XML-based format for guideline interchange and execution. Proc AMIA Symp 205-209, 2000
29. Zeger SL, Liang K-Y: Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42:121-130, 1986
30. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 6. 4th ed. Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 1989
31. McCullough D, Price M, Hindmarch M, Wagner E: A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: early results and lessons learned. Effect Clin Pract 1:12-22, 1998
32. Smith S, Murphy M, Huschka T, Dineen SF, Gorman C, Zimmerman B, Rizza R, Maessens J: Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on the care of patients seen in a subspecialty diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care 21:972-976, 1998
33. Nathan D, McKitrick C, Larkin M, Schaffran R, Singer D: Glycemic control in diabetes mellitus: have changes in therapy made a difference. Am J Med 100:157-163, 1996
34. Posner BM, Franz MM, Quatromoni PA, Gagnon DR, Sytkowski PA, D'Agostino RB, Cupples LA: Secular trends in diet and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. J Am Diet Assoc 95:171-179, 1995
35. Iribarren C, Luepker RV, McGovern PG, Arnett DK, Blackburn H: Twelve-year trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Minnesota Heart Survey: are socioeconomic differences widening? Arch Intern Med 157:873-881, 1997
36. Bild DE, Jacobs DR, Liu K, Williams OD, Hilner JE, Perkins LL, Marcovina SM, Hulley SB: Seven-year trends in plasma low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol in young adults: the CARDIA Study. Ann Epidemiol 6:235-245, 1996
37. Lobach DF, Hammond WE: Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted management protocol (CAMP): improved compliance with care guidelines for diabetes mellitus. Proc Annu Symp Comptut Appl Med Care 787-791, 1994
38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837-853, 1998
39. Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P: How well does chart abstraction measure quality: a prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record Am J Med 108:642-649, 2000
40. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Kaplan RM, Vinicor F, Smith L, Norman J: If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one: a population-based approach to chronic illness. Ann Behav Med 21:159-170, 1999
41. Grant RG, Meigs JB: The use of computers in population-based diabetes management. J Clin Outcomes Management 9:390-396, 2002