Membrane protein orientation and refinement using a knowledge-based statistical potential

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Nugent, Timothy ^a   Jones, David T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Membrane protein; Orientation; Refinement; Statistical potential

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; DIRECT SEARCH ALGORITHM; EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; REFINEMENT; STATISTICAL POTENTIAL; TRANS-MEMBRANE PROTEINS;

CRYSTAL ORIENTATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LIPID BILAYERS;

PROTEINS;

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LIPID BILAYER; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE BASES; LIPID BILAYERS; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84884189313     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-276     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235-242. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235, 102472, 10592235.
2. Fagerberg L, Jonasson K, von Heijne G, Uhlén M, Berglund L. Prediction of the human membrane proteome. Proteomics 2010, 10:1141-1149. 10.1002/pmic.200900258, 20175080.
3. Viklund H, Elofsson A. OCTOPUS: improving topology prediction by two-track ANN-based preference scores and an extended topological grammar. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1662-1668. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn221, 18474507.
4. Viklund H, Bernsel A, Skwark M, Elofsson A. SPOCTOPUS: a combined predictor of signal peptides and membrane protein topology. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2928-2929. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn550, 18945683.
5. Nugent T, Jones DT. Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinforma 2009, 10:159.
6. Nugent T, Jones DT. Detecting pore-lining regions in transmembrane protein sequences. BMC Bioinforma 2012, 13:169.
7. Bernsel A, Viklund H, Falk J, Lindahl E, von Heijne G, Elofsson A. Prediction of membrane-protein topology from first principles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:7177-7181. 10.1073/pnas.0711151105, 2438223, 18477697.
8. Pellegrini-Calace M, Carotti A, Jones DT. Folding in lipid membranes (FILM): a novel method for the prediction of small membrane protein 3D structures. Proteins 2003, 50:537-545. 10.1002/prot.10304, 12577259.
9. Hurwitz N, Pellegrini-Calace M, Jones DT. Towards genome-scale structure prediction for transmembrane proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006, 361:465-475. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1804, 1609336, 16524835.
10. Nugent T, Jones DT. Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:E1540-E1547. 10.1073/pnas.1120036109, 3386101, 22645369.
11. Hopf TA, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Rost B, Sander C, Marks DS. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 2012, 149:1607-1621. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.012, 3641781, 22579045.
12. Yarov-Yarovoy V, Schonbrun J, Baker D. Multi-pass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Proteins 2006, 62:1010-1025. 1479309, 16372357.
13. Barth P, Schonbrun J, Baker D. Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:15682-15687. 10.1073/pnas.0702515104, 2000396, 17905872.
14. Barth P, Wallner B, Baker D. Prediction of membrane protein structures with complex topologies using limited constraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:1409-1414. 10.1073/pnas.0808323106, 2635801, 19190187.
15. Lee AG. Lipid-protein interactions in biological membranes: a structural perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003, 1612:1-40. 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00056-7, 12729927.
16. Sansom MSP, Scott KA, Bond PJ. Coarse-grained simulation: a high-throughput computational approach to membrane proteins. Biochem Soc Trans 2008, 36:27-32. 10.1042/BST0360027, 18208379.
17. Bond PJ, Holyoake J, Ivetac A, Khalid S, Sansom MSP. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and peptides. J Struct Biol 2007, 157:593-605. 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.10.004, 17116404.
18. Lomize AL, Pogozheva ID, Lomize MA, Mosberg HI. Positioning of proteins in membranes: a computational approach. Protein Sci 2006, 15:1318-1333. 10.1110/ps.062126106, 2242528, 16731967.
19. Lomize MA, Lomize AL, Pogozheva ID, Mosberg HI. OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:623-625. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk023, 16397007.
20. Lomize MA, Pogozheva ID, Joo H, Mosberg HI, Lomize AL. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D370-D376. 10.1093/nar/gkr703, 3245162, 21890895.
21. Tusnády GE, Dosztányi Z, Simon I. TMDET: web server for detecting transmembrane regions of proteins by using their 3D coordinates. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1276-1277. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti121, 15539454.
22. Tusnády GE, Dosztányi Z, Simon I. PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmembrane proteins in the protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:D275-D278. 539956, 15608195.
23. Kozma D, Simon I, Tusnády GE. PDBTM: protein data bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D524-D529. 10.1093/nar/gks1169, 3531219, 23203988.
24. Senes A, Chadi DC, Law PB, Walters RFS, Nanda V, Degrado WF. E(z), a depth-dependent potential for assessing the energies of insertion of amino acid side-chains into membranes: derivation and applications to determining the orientation of transmembrane and interfacial helices. J Mol Biol 2007, 366:436-448. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.020, 17174324.
25. Schramm CA, Hannigan BT, Donald JE, Keasar C, Saven JG, Degrado WF, Samish I. Knowledge-based potential for positioning membrane-associated structures and assessing residue-specific energetic contributions. Structure 2012, 20:924-935. 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.016, 3366090, 22579257.
26. Hsieh D, Davis A, Nanda V. A knowledge-based potential highlights unique features of membrane α-helical and β-barrel protein insertion and folding. Protein Sci 2012, 21:50-62. 10.1002/pro.758, 3323780, 22031179.
27. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database: its relevance to human molecular medical research. J Mol Med 1997, 75:312-316.
28. Jones DT, McGuffin LJ. Assembling novel protein folds from super-secondary structural fragments. Proteins 2003, 53(Suppl 6):480-485.
29. Ulmschneider MB, Sansom MSP, Di Nola A. Properties of integral membrane protein structures: derivation of an implicit membrane potential. Prot: Struc, Func Bioinform 2005, 59:252-265.
30. Petsko GA, Ringe D. Protein structure and function (Primers in Biology) 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Hessa T, Meindl-Beinker NM, Bernsel A, Kim H, Sato Y, Lerch-Bader M, Nilsson I, White SH, von Heijne G. Molecular code for transmembrane-helix recognition by the Sec61 translocon. Nature 2007, 450:1026-1030. 10.1038/nature06387, 18075582.
32. Strugatsky D, McNulty R, Munson K, Chen C-K, Soltis SM, Sachs G, Luecke H. Structure of the proton-gated urea channel from the gastric pathogen helicobacter pylori. Nature 2013, 493:255-258.
33. Xu J, Zhang Y. How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:889-895. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066, 2913670, 20164152.
34. Lu M, Fu D. Structure of the zinc transporter YiiP. Science 2007, 317:1746-1748. 10.1126/science.1143748, 17717154.
35. He X, Szewczyk P, Karyakin A, Evin M, Hong WX, Zhang Q, Chang G. Structure of a cation-bound multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter. Nature 2010, 467:991-994. 10.1038/nature09408, 3152480, 20861838.
36. Stansfeld PJ, Sansom MSP. From coarse grained to atomistic: a serial multi scale approach to membrane protein simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 2011, 7:1157-1166.
37. Senes A. Computational design of membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struc Biol 2011, 21:460-466.
38. Whitley P, Nilsson I, von Heijne G. De novo design of integral membrane proteins. Nat Struc Mol Biol 1994, 1:858-862.
39. Barth P, Schonbrun J, Baker D. Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures. PNAS 2007, 104:15682-15687. 10.1073/pnas.0702515104, 2000396, 17905872.
40. Bowie JU. Understanding membrane protein structure by design. Nat Struc Mol Biol 2000, 7:91-94.
41. Seppälä S, Slusky JS, Lloris-Garcerá P, Rapp M, von Heijne G. Control of membrane protein topology by a single C-terminal residue. Science 2010, 328:1698-1700. 10.1126/science.1188950, 20508091.
42. MacCallum JL, Hua L, Schnieders MJ, Pande VS, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8. Proteins 2009, 77(Suppl 9):66-80. 2801025, 19714776.
43. MacCallum JL, Pérez A, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9. Proteins 2011, 79(Suppl 10):74-90. 3238793, 22069034.
44. Granseth E, Viklund H, Elofsson A. ZPRED: predicting the distance to the membrane center for residues in -helical membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:e191-e196. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl206, 16873471.
45. Nugent T, Jones DT. Predicting transmembrane helix packing arrangements using residue contacts and a force-directed algorithm. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000714. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000714, 2841610, 20333233.
46. Liang J, Adamian L, Jackups R. The membrane-water interface region of membrane proteins: structural bias and the anti-snorkeling effect. Trends Biochem Sci 2005, 30:355-357. 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.05.003, 15935679.
47. Choi Y, Deane CM. FREAD revisited: accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm. Proteins 2010, 78:1431-1440.
48. Kelm S, Shi J, Deane CM. MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2833-2840. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq554, 2971581, 20926421.
49. Granseth E, von Heijne G, Elofsson A. A study of the membrane-water interface region of membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 2005, 346:377-385. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.036, 15663952.
50. Wang G, Dunbrack RL. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1589-1591. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224, 12912846.
51. Wang G, Dunbrack RL. PISCES: recent improvements to a PDB sequence culling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:W94-W98. 10.1093/nar/gki402, 1160163, 15980589.
52. Manning T, Sleator RD, Walsh P. Naturally selecting solutions: the use of genetic algorithms in bioinformatics. Biogeosciences 2012, 4(5):1-13.
53. Hooke R, Jeeves TA. " Direct search" solution of numerical and statistical problems. J ACM 1961, 8:212-229.
54. Jones DT, Buchan DWA, Cozzetto D, Pontil M. PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:184-190. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638, 22101153.
55. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M, Samudrala R. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struc Biol 2004, 4:8.
56. Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, Šali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struc 2000, 29:291-325.