Relationship between microstructure, material distribution, and mechanical properties of sheep tibia during fracture healing process

International Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1560-1569

  Gao, Jiazi ^a   Gong, He ^a   Huang, Xing ^b   Fang, Juan ^a   Zhu, Dong ^c   Fan, Yubo ^d  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b People's Hospital of Jilin Province   (China)

^c THE FIRST HOSPITAL OF JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Fracture healing process; Material distribution; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Tibia

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MICROSTRUCTURE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRENGTH; BONY MATERIAL DISTRIBUTION; CALLUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE HEALING; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TIBIA; TIBIA FRACTURE;

FRACTURE HEALING PROCESS; MATERIAL DISTRIBUTION; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES.; MICROSTRUCTURE; TIBIA;

ANIMALS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE HEALING; SHEEP; TIBIA;

EID: 84883891820     PISSN: 14491907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6611     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kim SK, Chang SH, Jung HJ. The finite element analysis of a fractured tibia applied by composite bone plates considering contact conditions and time-varying properties of curing tissues. Compos Struct. 2010; 92(9): 2109-2118.
2. Nelson FR, Brighton CT, Ryaby J, et al. Use of physical forces in bone healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11(5): 344-354.
3. Jäger M, Ott CE, Grünhagen J, et al. Composite transcriptome assembly of RNA-seq data in a sheep model for delayed bone healing. BMC Genomics. 2011; 12: 158.
4. Weis JA, Miga MI, Granero-Moltó F, et al. A finite element inverse analysis to assess functional improvement during the fracture healing process. J Biomech. 2010; 43(3): 557-562.
5. Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, et al. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011; 9: 66.
6. Gerstenfeld LC, Cullinane DM, Barnes GL, et al. Fracture healing as a post-natal developmental process: molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 88: 873-884.
7. Schindeler A, McDonald MM, Bokko P, et al. Bone remodeling during fracture repair: The cellular picture. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008; 19: 459-466.
8. Carano RA, Filvaroff EH. Angiogenesis and bone repair. Drug Discov Today. 2003; 8(21): 980-989.
9. Christel P, Cerf G, Pilla A. Time evolution of the mechanical properties of the callus of fresh fractures. Ann Biomed Eng. 1981; 9: 383-391.
10. Gardner TN, Stoll T, Marks L, et al. The influence of mechanical stimulus on the pattern of tissue differentiation in a long bone fracture- an FEM study. J Biomech. 2000; 33: 415-425.
11. Boccaccio A, Ballini A, Pappalettere C, et al. Finite element method (FEM), mechanobiology and biomimetic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Sci. 2011; 7(1): 112-132.
12. Boyd SK, Müller R. Smooth surface meshing for automated finite element model generation from 3D image data. J Biomech. 2006; 39(7): 1287-1295.
13. Schell H, Thompson MS, Bail HJ, et al. Mechanical induction of critically delayed bone healing in sheep: radiological and biomechanical results. J Biomech. 2008; 41(14): 3066-3072.
14. Epari DR, Schell H, Bail HJ, et al. Instability prolongs the chondral phase during bone healing in sheep. Bone. 2006; 38(6): 864-870.
15. Shefelbinea SJ, Simona U, Claesa L, et al. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. Bone. 2005; 36: 480-488.
16. D'Elia G, Caracchini G, Cavalli L, et al. Bone fragility and imaging techniques. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2009; 6(3): 234-246.
17. Ladd AJ, Kinney JH, Haupt DL, et al. Finite-element modeling of trabecular bone: comparison with mechanical testing and determination of tissue modulus. J Orthop Res. 1998; 16(5): 622-628.
18. Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone. 2009; 44(2): 335-344.
19. Gabet Y, Müller R, Regev E, et al. Osteogenic growth peptide modulates fracture callus structural and mechanical properties. Bone. 2004; 35: 65-73.
20. Rhee Y, Hur JH, Won YY, et al. Assessment of bone quality using finite element analysis based upon micro-CT images. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009; 1: 40-47.
21. Saidpour SH. Assessment of carbon fibre composite fracture fixation plate using finite element analysis. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006; 34(7): 1157-1163.
22. Leong PL, Morgan EF. Correlations between indentation modulus and mineral density in bone-fracture calluses. Integr Comp Biol. 2009; 49(1): 59-68.
23. Gardner TN, Mishra S. The biomechanical environment of a bone fracture and its influence upon the morphology of healing. Med Eng Phys. 2003; 25(6): 455-464.
24. Cheal EJ, Mansmann KA, DiGioia AM 3rd, et al. Role of interfragmentary strain in fracture healing: ovine model of a healing osteotomy. J Orthop Res. 1991; 9(1): 131-142.
25. Goodship AE, Lawes TJ, Rubin CT. Low-magnitude high-frequency mechanical signals accelerate and augment endochondral bone repair: preliminary evidence of efficacy. J Orthop Res. 2009; 27(7): 922-930.
26. Wang L, Cheung JT, Pu F, et al. Why do woodpeckers resist head impact injury: a biomechanical investigation. PLoS One. 2011; 6 (10): e26490.
27. Chen G, Schmutz B, Epari D, et al. A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models. J Biomech. 2010; 43: 1011-1015.
28. Xinghua Z, He G, Dong Z, et al. A study of the effect of non-linearities in the equation of bone remodeling. J Biomech. 2002; 35(7): 951-960.
29. Yeni YN, Zelman EA, Divine GW, et al. Trabecular shear stress amplification and variability in human vertebral cancellous bone: relationship with age, gender, spine level and trabecular architecture. Bone. 2008; 42(3): 591-596.
30. Pistoia W, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, et al. High-resolution three-dimensional-pQCT images can be an adequate basis for in-vivo microFE analysis of bone. J Biomech Eng. 2001; 123(2): 176-183.
31. Gao JZ, Gong H, Fang J, et al. Biomechanical assessment for the effects of vibration during the rehabilitation process of osteoporosis. J Med biomech. 2011; 26(4): 315-320. (In Chinese).
32. Alonso-Rasgado T, Jimenez-Cruz D, Bailey CG, et al. Changes in the stress in the femoral head neck junction after osteochondroplasty for hip impingement: a finite element study. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30(12): 1999-2006.
33. Augat P, Merk J, Genant HK, et al. Quantitative assessment of experimental fracture repair by peripheral computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997; 60: 194-199.
34. Leong PL, Morgan EF. Measurement of fracture callus material properties via nanoindentation. Acta Biomater. 2008; 4(5): 1569-1575.
35. Gong H, Zhang M, Fan Y, et al. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012; 40(7): 1575-1585.
36. Kluess D, Souffrant R, Mittelmeier W, et al. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009; 95(1): 23-30.
37. Wieding J, Souffrant R, Fritsche A, et al. Finite element analysis of osteosynthesis screw fixation in the bone stock: an appropriate method for automatic screw modelling. PLoS One.2012; 7(3): e33776.