Finite-element modeling of trabecular bone: Comparison with mechanical testing and determination of tissue modulus

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 622-628

  Ladd, A J C ^a   Kinney, J H ^a   Haupt, D L ^a   Goldstein, S A ^a  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MICROMECHANICS; ELASTIC MODULI; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL TESTING; MEDICAL IMAGING; STIFFNESS;

TRABECULAR BONE;

BONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 0032171053     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160516     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1 Aaron JE, Makins NB, Sagreiya K: The microanatomy of trabecular bone loss in normal aging men and women. Clin Orthop 215: 260–271, 1987
2. 2 Choi K, Kuhn JL, Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA: The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size‐dependency of cortical bone modulus. J Biomech 23: 1103–1113, 1990
3. 3 Choi K, Goldstein SA: A comparison of the fatigue behavior of human trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech 25: 1371–1381, 1992
4. 4 Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M: The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4: 3–11, 1989
5. 5 Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Kuhn JL, Brown MB, Feldkamp LA: The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 27: 375–389, 1994
6. 6 Hollister SJ, Brennan JM, Kikuchi N: A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. J Biomech 27: 433–444, 1994
7. 7 Hughes TJR, Levit I, Winget JM: An element‐by‐element solution algorithm for problems of structural and solid mechanics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engr 36: 241–254, 1983
8. 8 Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC: Trabecular bone modulus, and strength can depend on specimen geometry. J Biomech 26: 991–1000. 1993
9. 9 Keaveny TM, Hayes WC: A 20‐year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng 115: 534–542, 1993
10. 10 Keaveny TM, Pinilla TP, Crawford HP, Kopperdahl DL, Lou A: Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 15: 101–110, 1997
11. 11 Kinney JH, Nichols MC: X‐ray tomographic microscopy using synchrotron radiation. Annu Rev Mater Sci 22: 121–152, 1992
12. 12 Kinney JH, Lane NE, Haupt DL: In vivo, three‐dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 10: 264–270, 1995
13. 13 Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, Weihs TP: Atomic force microscope measurements of the hardness and elasticity of peritubular and intertubular human dentin. J Biomech Eng 118: 133–135, 1996
14. 14 Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR, Stanciu J, Rao DS, Parfitt AM: The role of three‐dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression features. Calcif Tissue Int 37: 594–597, 1985
15. 15 Ladd AJC, Kinney JH: Elastic constants of cellular structures. Physica A 240: 349–360, 1997
16. 16 Ladd AJC, Kinney JH, Breunig TM: Deformation and failure in cellular materials. Phys Rev E 55: 3271–3275, 1997
17. 17 Ladd AJC, Kinney JH: Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite‐clement modeling of trabecular bone. In press
18. 18 Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F: The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 25: 359–368, 1992
19. 19 Mellish RWE, Garrahan NJ, Compston JE: Age‐related changes in trabecular width and spacing in human iliac crest biopsies. Bone Miner 6: 331–338, 1989
20. 20 Mosekilde L: Age‐related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture—assessed by a new method. Bone 9: 247–250, 1988
21. 21 Müller R, Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P: Non‐invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three‐dimensional structure of trabecular bone. Phys Med Biol 39: 145–164, 1994
22. 22 Odgaard A, Goldstein S, Kinney JH: Three‐dimensionl connectivity for human morphometry: a comparison of imaging techniques. In: International Conference on Bone Morphometry. Sardinia, Italy, 1996
23. 23 Parfitt AM, Mathews CHE, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS: Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis: implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 72: 1396–1409, 1983
24. 24 Recker RR: Low bone mass may not be the only cause of skeletal fragility in osteoporosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 191: 272–274, 1998
25. 25 Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH: Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech 26: 111–119, 1993
26. 26 Rho JY, Tsui TY, Pharr GM: Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 18: 1325–1330, 1997
27. 27 Rüegsegger P, Koller B, Müller R: A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calif Tissue Int 58: 24–29, 1996
28. 28 Ulrich D, Hildebrand T, van Rietbergen B, Müller R, Rüeg‐segger P: The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with microtomography, FEA and mechanical testing. In: Bone Research in Biomechanics, pp 97–112. Ed by G Lowet, Rüegsegger, H Weinans, and A Meunier. Amsterdam, IOS Press, 1997
29. 29 van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R, Odgaard A: A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite‐element models J Biomech 28: 69–81, 1995
30. 30 Weinstein RS, Hutson MS: Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging. Bone 8: 137–142, 1987