Correlations between indentation modulus and mineral density in bone-fracture calluses

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 59-68

  Leong, Pui L ^a   Morgan, Elise F ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RATTUS;

EID: 67749114273     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: 15577023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icp024     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Athanasiou KA, Zhu CF, Wang X, Agrawal CM. 2000. Effects of aging and dietary restriction on the structural integrity of rat articular cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 28:143-9.
2. Bei H, George EP, Hay JL, Pharr GM. 2005. Influence of indenter tip geometry on elastic deformation during nanoindentation. Phys Rev Lett 95:045501.
3. Claes LE, Heigele CA. 1999. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32:255-66.
4. Currey JD. 2004. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content. J Biomech 37:549-56.
5. Dong XN, Guo XE. 2004. The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. J Biomech 37:1281-7.
6. Donnelly E, Baker SP, Boskey AL, van der Meulen MC. 2006. Effects of surface roughness and maximum load on the mechanical properties of cancellous bone measured by nanoindentation. J Biomed Mater Res A 77:426-35.
7. Einhorn TA. 1998. The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop: S7-21.
8. Fan Z, Rho JY. 2003. Effects of viscoelasticity and time-dependent plasticity on nanoindentation measurements of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 67:208-14.
9. Ferguson VL, Bushby AJ, Boyde A. 2003. Nanomechanical properties and mineral concentration in articular calcified cartilage and subchondral bone. J Anat 203:191-202.
10. Franke O, Durst K, Maier V, Goken M, Birkholz T, Schneider H, Hennig F, Gelse K. 2007. Mechanical properties of hyaline and repair cartilage studied by nanoindentation. Acta Biomater 3:873-81.
11. Gardner TN, Mishra S. 2003. The biomechanical environment of a bone fracture and its influence upon the morphology of healing. Med Eng Phys 25:455-64.
12. Gardner TN, Mishra S, Marks L. 2004. The role of osteogenic index, octahedral shear stress and dilatational stress in the ossification of a fracture callus. Med Eng Phys 26:493-501.
13. Gardner TN, Stoll T, Marks L, Mishra S, Knothe TM. 2000. The influence of mechanical stimulus on the pattern of tissue differentiation in a long bone fracture-an FEM study. J Biomech 33:415-25.
14. Gupta HS, Schratter S, Tesch W, Roschger P, Berzlanovich A, Schoeberl T, Klaushofer K, Fratzl P. 2005. Two different correlations between nanoindentation modulus and mineral content in the bone-cartilage interface. J Struct Biol 149:138-48.
15. Hengsberger S, Kulik A, Zysset P. 2002. Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions. Bone 30:178-84.
16. Klapperich CM, Komvopoulos K, Pruitt L. 2001. Nanomechanical properties of polymers determined from nanoindentation experiments. J Tribol 123:624-31.
17. Leong PL, Morgan EF. 2008. Measurement of fracture callus material properties via nanoindentation. Acta Biomater 4:1569-75.
18. Li C, Pruitt LA, King KB. 2006. Nanoindentation differentiates tissue-scale functional properties of native articular cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res A 78:729-38.
19. Liu D, Weiner S, Wagner HD. 1999. Anisotropic mechanical properties of lamellar bone using miniature cantilever bending specimens. J Biomech 32:647-54.
20. Markel MD, Wikenheiser MA, Chao EY. 1990. A study of fracture callus material properties: relationship to the torsional strength of bone. J Orthop Res 8:843-50.
21. McKibbin B. 1978. The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60-B:150-62.
22. Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, Pfeiffer AJ, Barnes GL, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC. 2009. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone 44:335-44.
23. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. 1992. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564-83.
24. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Soballe K. 1997. ESB Research Award 1996. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30:539-48.
25. Rho JY, Zioupos P, Currey JD, Pharr GM. 1999. Variations in the individual thick lamellar properties within osteons by nanoindentation. Bone 25:295-300.
26. Salisbury-Palomares KT, Gleason R, Mason ZD, Cullinane DM, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC, Morgan EF. 2009. Mechanical stimulation alters tissue differentiation and molecular expression. J Orthop Res. 2009 Feb 25 [Epub ahead of print].
27. Sarmiento A, Latta LL. 1995. Functional fracture bracing: tibia humerus ulna. Berlin: Springer Verlag. p. 239-40.
28. Shefelbine SJ, Simon U, Claes L, Gold A, Gabet Y, Bab I, Muller R, Augat P. 2005. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. Bone 36:480-8.
29. Silva MJ, Brodt MD, Fan Z, Rho JY. 2004. Nanoindentation and whole-bone bending estimates of material properties in bones from the senescence accelerated mouse SAMP6. J Biomech 37:1639-46.
30. Smith-Adaline EA, Volkman SK, Ignelzi MA Jr, Slade J, Platte S, Goldstein SA. 2004. Mechanical environment alters tissue formation patterns during fracture repair. J Orthop Res 22:1079-85.
31. Zhang T-Y, Xu W-H. 2002. Surface effects on nanoindentation. J Mater Res 17:1715-20.
32. Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Goldstein SA. 1999. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech 32:1005-12.