Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: Perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relations

Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 713-718

  Molster, Caron ^a   Potts, Ayla ^a   McNamara, Beverley ^b   Youngs, Leanne ^a   Maxwell, Susannah ^a   Dawkins, Hugh ^a,c,d   O'Leary, Peter ^c,d,e  

^a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CITIZENSHIP; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TRUST; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; INTERVIEW; MALE; MANAGEMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION;

FEMALE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 84883679396     PISSN: 19450265     EISSN: 19450257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0044     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abelson J, Eyles J, McLeod CB, et al. (2003a) Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy 66:95-106. (Pubitemid 37123026)
2. Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, et al. (2003b) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 57:239-251. (Pubitemid 36582667)
3. Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, et al. (2004) Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 9:205-212. (Pubitemid 39424760)
4. Ankeny RA, Dodds S (2008) Hearing community voices: public engagement in Australian human embryo research policy 2005-2007. New Genet Soc 27:217-232.
5. Avard D, Bucci L, Burgess M, et al. (2009) Public health genomics and public participation: points to consider. J Public Deliberation 5:1-21.
6. Bachtiger A, Niemeyer S, Neblo M, et al. (2010) Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. J PolitPhilos 18:32-63.
7. Beierle T (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Stud Rev 16:75-103. (Pubitemid 30011143)
8. Bennett P, Smith SJ (2007) Genetics, insurance and participation: how a Citizens' Jury reached its verdict. Soc Sci Med 64:2487-2498. (Pubitemid 46755947)
9. Bombard Y, Miller FA, Hayeems RZ, et al. (2012) Citizens' values regarding research with stored samples from newborn screening in Canada. Pediatrics 129:239-247.
10. Burgess M (2004) Public consultation in ethics: an experiment in representative ethics. J Bioeth Inq 1:4-13.
11. Burgess M, O'Doherty K, Secko D (2008) Biobanking in BC: enhancing discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Per Med 5:285-296. (Pubitemid 351824567)
12. De Vries R, Stanczyk A, Wall IF, et al. (2010) Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research. Soc Sci Med 70:1896-1903.
13. Delli Carpini MX, Cook FL, Jacobs LR (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu Rev Pol Sci 7:315-344. (Pubitemid 38920021)
14. Einsiedel EF (2002) Assessing a controversial medical technology: canadian public consultations on xenotransplantations. Public Understand Sci 11:315-331.
15. Einsiedel EF, Ross H (2002) Animal spare parts? A Canadian public consultation on xenotransplantation. Sci Eng Ethics 8:579-591.
16. Gastil J, Levine P (2005) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies For Effective Engagement in the 21st Century. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
17. Goodin R, Dryzek J (2006) Deliberative impacts: the macropolitical uptake of mini-publics. Polit Soc 34:219-244. (Pubitemid 43742315)
18. Hartz-Karp J (2007) How and why deliberative democracy enables co-intelligence and brings wisdom to governance. J Public Deliberation 3: Article 6.
19. Iredale R, Longley M, Thomas C, Shaw A (2006) What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A Citizen's Jury of young people in South Wales. Health Expect 9:207-217.
20. Menon D, Stafinski T (2008) Engaging the public in prioritysetting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury. Health Expect 11:282-293.
21. Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L, et al. (2013) Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect 16:211-224.
22. Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L, et al. (2012) An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking. Public Health Genomics 15:82-91.
23. Niemeyer S, Dryzek J (2007-2008) The ends of deliberation: meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes. Swiss Pol Sci Rev 2:497-526.
24. O'Doherty K, Hawkins AK, Burgess MM (2012) Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation. Soc Sci Med 75:1604-1611.
25. O'Leary C (2009) Don't bank on DNA discretion: alarm bells are ringing as ground rules are being set for the rapidly growing genetics industry. In The West Australian. Seven West Media Limited, Perth, Western Australia. pp 32-33.
26. Parkinson J (2003) Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Pol Stud 51:180-196. (Pubitemid 37023266)
27. Rowe G, Marsh R, Frewer LJ (2004) Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Sci Technol Hum Values 29:88-121. (Pubitemid 38023900)
28. Smith G, Wales C (2000) Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy. Pol Stud 48:51-65.
29. Tansey J, Burgess M (2006) Democracy, ethics and genomics: introduction to a special issue. Integr Assess J 6:1-8.
30. Timotijevic L, Raats MM (2007) Evaluation of two methods of deliberative participation of older people in food policy development. Health Policy 82:302-319. (Pubitemid 46962786)
31. Walmsley HL (2009) Mad scientists bend the frame of biobank governance in British Columbia. J Public Deliberation 5: Article 6.