Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 88-121

  Rowe, Gene ^a   Marsh, Roy ^b   Frewer, Lynn J ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deliberative conference; Evaluation; Public participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346361828     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243903259194     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal American Institute of Planners 35:215-24.
2. Barnes, M. 1999. Building a deliberative democracy: An evaluation of two citizens' juries. Guildford, UK: Biddles.
3. Beierle, T. C., and D. M. Konisky. 2000. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 (4): 587-602.
4. Carr, D. S., and K. Halvorsen. 2001. An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: Surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Society and Natural Resources 14 (2): 107-26.
5. Chess, C., and K. Purcell. 1999. Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science and Technology 33 (16): 2685-92.
6. Crosby, N., J. M. Kelly, and P. Schaefer. 1986. Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review 46:170-78.
7. Fiorino, D. J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (2): 226-43.
8. Fitzpatrick, R., and D. White. 1997. Public participation in the evaluation of health care. Health and Social Care in the Community 5 (1): 3-8.
9. Guston, D. H. 1999. Evaluating the first US consensus conference: The impact of the citizens' panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science, Technology, & Human Values 24 (4): 451-82.
10. Hilgartner, S. 1990. The dominant view of popularisation: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science 20:519-39.
11. HM Government. 2001. The interim response to the report of the BSE inquiry by HM Government in consultation with the devolved administrations. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
12. Joss, S. 1995. Evaluating consensus conferences: Necessity or luxury? In Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe, edited by S. Joss and J. Durant, 89-108. London, UK: The Science Museum.
13. Martin, S., and A. Boaz. 2000. Public participation and citizen-centred local government: Lessons from the best value and better government for older people pilot programmes. Public Money and Management 20 (2): 47-53.
14. McCool, S. F., and K. Guthrie. 2001. Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Society and Natural Resources 14:309-23.
15. McIver, S. 1998. Healthy debate? An independent evaluation of citizens' juries in health settings. London, UK: The King's Fund.
16. Nelkin, D., and M. Pollak. 1979. Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusion? Technology Review 81:55-64.
17. Owens, S. 2000. Engaging the public: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning 32:1141-48.
18. Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann. 1995. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. London, UK: Kluwer Academic.
19. Roberts, T., S. Bryan, C. Heginbotham, and A. McCallum. 1999. Public involvement in health care priority setting: An economic perspective. Health Expectations 2:235-44.
20. Rosener, J. B. 1981. User-oriented evaluation: A new way to view citizen participation. Journal Applied Behavioral Science 17 (4): 583-96.
21. Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 25 (1): 3-29.
22. _. 2004. Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda. (forthcoming in Science, Technology, & Human Values 29[4]).
23. Rowe, G., R. Marsh, C. Reynolds, and L. J. Frewer. 2001. Public participation methods: Evolving and operationalising an evaluation framework: Final report. Norwich, UK: Institute of Food Research Report to the Department of Health and Health and Safety Executive.
24. Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 14:239-49.
25. Webler, T. 1995. "Right" discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick. In Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse, edited by O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, 35-86. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.