Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 427-457

  Mearsheimer, John J ^a   Walt, Stephen M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cumulative knowledge; hypothesis testing; methodology; policy relevance; professional norms; scientific realism; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883639332     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066113494320     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Achen CH.Toward a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART.Annual Review of Political Science. 2002;5:423-450.
2. Achen CH.Let's put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong.Conflict Management and Peace Science. 2005;22 (3): 327-339.
3. Achen CH,Snidal D.Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies.World Politics. 1989;41 (2): 143-169.
4. Aggarwal VK.I don't get no respect: The travails of IPE.International Studies Quarterly. 2010;54 (3): 893-895.
5. Beck N,King G,Zeng L.Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture.American Political Science Review. 2000;94 (1): 21-35.
6. Bennett A,Elman C.Case study methods in the International Relations subfield.Comparative Political Studies. 2007;40 (2): 170-195.
7. Bennett A,Barth A,Rutherford KR.Do we preach what we practice? A survey of methods in political science journals and curricula.PS: Political Science & Politics. 2003;36 (3): 373-378.
8. Blattman C,Miguel E.Civil war.Journal of Economic Literature. 2010;48 (1): 3-57.
9. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Brady HECollier D, ed. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004:.
10. Braumoeller BF,Sartori AEModels, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Sprinz DWolinsky Y, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2004:129-151.
11. Brooks RA.Making military might: Why do states fail and succeed? A review essay.International Security. 2003;28 (2): 149-191.
12. Brooks SProducing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the Changing Calculus of Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
13. Bueno de Mesquita B,Morrow J.Sorting through the wealth of notions.International Security. 1999;24 (2): 56-73.
14. Cederman LE,Wimmer A,Min B.Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis.World Politics. 2010;62 (1): 87-119.
15. ChakravarttyA (2011) Scientific realism. In: ZaltaE (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/scientific-realism/ (accessed 24 October 2012).
16. Chen HTTheory Driven Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1990:.
17. Clarke KA,Primo DM.Modernizing political science: A model-based approach.Perspectives on Politics. 2007;5 (4): 741-753.
18. Cohen BJ.Are IPE journals becoming boring?.International Studies Quarterly. 2010;54 (3): 887-891.
19. Deaton A.Instruments, randomization, and learning about development.Journal of Economic Literature. 2010;48 (2): 424-455.
20. Dessler D.Beyond correlations: Toward a causal theory of war.International Studies Quarterly. 1991;35 (3): 337-355.
21. Downes AB.Catastrophic success: Foreign-imposed regime change and civil war. American Political Science Association Conference; 2010Washington, DC; 2010.
22. Downes AB,Monten J.Forced to be free? Why foreign-imposed regime change rarely leads to democratization.International Security. 2013;37 (4): 90-131.
23. Downes AB,Sechser T.The illusion of democratic credibility.International Organization. 2012;66 (3): 457-489.
24. Doyle MW.Kant, liberal legacies and foreign affairs.Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1983;12 (3): 205-235.
25. Farber HS,Gowa J.Polities and peace.International Security. 1995;20 (2): 123-146.
26. Fearon JD.Signaling versus the balance of power and interests.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1994;38 (2): 236-269.
27. Fravel MT.International relations theory and China's rise: Assessing China's potential for territorial expansion.International Studies Review. 2010;12 (4): 505-532.
28. Friedman MEssays in Positive Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1953:.
29. George AL,Bennett ACase Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; 2004:.
30. George AL,Smoke RDeterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press; 1974:.
31. Gibler D.Bordering on peace: Democracy, territorial issues, and conflict.International Studies Quarterly. 2007;51 (3): 509-532.
32. Gowa JBallots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999:.
33. Hamermesh D.Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?.Journal of Economic Literature. 2013;51 (1): 1-11.
34. Hedstrom P,Ylikoski P.Causal mechanisms in the social sciences.Annual Review of Sociology. 2010;36:49-67.
35. Hegre H,Sambanis N.Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2006;50 (4): 508-535.
36. HirschJE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Available at: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0508/0508025v5.pdf (accessed 24 October 2012).
37. Huth PExtended Deterrence and the Prevention of War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1988:.
38. Huth P.The extended deterrent value of nuclear weapons.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1990;34 (2): 270-290.
39. Huth P,Russett B.What makes deterrence work? Cases from 1900 to 1980.World Politics. 1984;36 (4): 496-526.
40. International Relations Theory and the Consequnces of Unipolarity. Ikenberry JMastanduno MWohlforth W, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:.
41. Imai K,Keele L,Tingley D, et al.Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies.American Political Science Review. 2011;105 (4): 765-789.
42. Jervis RIn Search of Global Patterns. Rosenau JN, ed. New York: Free Press; 1976:181-185.
43. Johnson J.Consequences of positivism: A pragmatist assessment.Comparative Political Studies. 2006;39 (2): 224-252.
44. Johnson J.What rationality assumption? Or, how 'positive political theory' rests on a mistake.Political Studies. 2010;58 (2): 282-299.
45. Johnston AI.What (if anything) does East Asia tell us about International Relations theory?.Annual Review of Political Science. 2012;15:53-78.
46. Jordan R,Maliniak D,Oakes A, et al.One discipline or many? TRIP survey of international relations faculty in ten countries.Report, The Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, The College of William and Mary, VA. 2009;:.
47. Kalyvas SNOrder, Conflict, Violence. Kalyvas SNShapiro IMasoud T, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:397-421.
48. Kaplan FThe Wizards of Armageddon. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1983:.
49. King G,Zeng L.Explaining rare events in international relations.International Organization. 2001;55 (3): 693-715.
50. King G,Keohane RO,Verba SDesigning Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994:.
51. Lake DA.Why 'isms' are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress.International Studies Quarterly. 2011;55 (2): 465-480.
52. Layne C.Kant or cant: The myth of the democratic peace.International Security. 1994;19 (2): 5-49.
53. Liu Q.China's rise and regional strategy: Power, interdependence and identity.Journal of Cambridge Studies. 2010;5 (4): 76-92.
54. Lyall J.Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks? Evidence from Chechnya.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2009;53 (3): 331-362.
55. Lyall J.Are coethnics more effective counterinsurgents? Evidence from the second Chechen war.American Political Science Review. 2010;104 (1): 1-20.
56. Lyall J,Wilson I.Rage against the machines: Explaining outcomes in counterinsurgency wars.International Organization. 2009;63 (1): 67-106.
57. Lynn-Jones SM.Offense-Defense theory and its critics.Security Studies. 1995;4 (4): 660-691.
58. MacDonald PK.Useful fiction or miracle maker: The competing epistemological foundations of rational choice theory.American Political Science Review. 2003;97 (4): 551-565.
59. McKeown TJ.Case studies and the statistical worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.International Organization. 1999;53 (1): 161-190.
60. Mahoney J.Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method.Sociological Forum. 2001;16 (3): 575-593.
61. Maliniak D,Oakes A,Peterson S, et al.The view from the ivory tower: TRIP survey of international relations faculty in the United States and Canada.Report, The Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, The College of William and Mary, VA. 2007;:.
62. Maliniak D,Oakes A,Peterson S, et al.International relations in the US academy.International Studies Quarterly. 2011;55 (2): 437-464.
63. Maliniak D,Peterson S,Tierney MJ.TRIP around the world: Teaching, research, and policy views of international relations faculty in 20 countries.Report, The Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, The College of William and Mary, VA. 2012;:.
64. Mansfield ED,Snyder JElecting to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:.
65. Monteiro NP.Unrest assured: Why unipolarity is not peaceful.International Security. 2011/ 2012;36 (3): 9-40.
66. Moravcsik A.Active citation: A precondition for replicable qualitative research.PS: Political Science and Politics. 2010;43 (1): 29-35.
67. Nathanson M.Desperately seeking mathematical proof.The Mathematical Intelligencer. 2009;31 (2): 8-10.
68. Oatley T.The reductionist gamble: Open economy politics in the global economy.International Organization. 2011;65 (2): 311-341.
69. Olson MThe Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1965:.
70. Ostrom EGoverning the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
71. Pape RABombing to Win: Airpower and Coercion in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1996:.
72. Peic G,Reiter D.Foreign imposed regime change, state power, and civil war onset, 1920-2004.British Journal of Political Science. 2011;41 (3): 453-475.
73. Peterson S,Tierney MJ,Maliniak D.Teaching and research practices, views on the discipline, and policy attitudes of international relations faculty at US colleges and universities.Report, Program on the Theory and Practice of International Relations, The College of William and Mary, VA. 2005;:.
74. Pickering J,Peceny M.Forging democracy at gunpoint.International Studies Quarterly. 2006;50 (3): 539-560.
75. Putnam HMathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. London: Cambridge University Press; 1975:.
76. Ray JL.Explaining interstate conflict and war: What should be controlled for?.Conflict Management and Peace Science. 2003;20 (1): 1-31.
77. Reese MJ.Personal communication. 2012;:.
78. Reiter D,Stam ACDemocracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002:.
79. Sartori G.Concept misformation in comparative politics.American Political Science Review. 1970;64 (4): 1033-1053.
80. Schelling TCArms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1966:.
81. Schrodt P.Beyond the linear frequentist orthodoxy.Political Analysis. 2006;14 (3): 335-339.
82. Schrodt P.Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysis. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2010Washington, DC; 2010.
83. Scott J,Light MDemocratic Vistas: Reflections on the Life of American Democracy. Purdy J, ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2004:.
84. Seawright JRethinking Social Inquiry. 2010) Regression-based inference: A case study in failed causal assessment. In: BradyHECollierD (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry (2nd edn). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Brady HECollier D, ed. New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2010:.
85. Shapiro JN,Weidmann NB.Is the phone mightier than the sword? Cell phones and insurgent violence in Iraq.Princeton University. 2012;:.
86. Signorino C.Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict.American Political Science Review. 1999;93 (2): 279-297.
87. Snyder JL.Richness, rigor, and relevance in the study of Soviet foreign policy.International Security. 1984/ 1985;9 (3): 89-108.
88. Tapp C, et al.Iraq war mortality estimates: A systematic review.Conflict and Health. 2008;2:1.
89. Thies WJWhen Governments Collide: Coercion and Diplomacy in the Vietnam Conflict, 1964-1968. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1980:.
90. Tomz M,Weeks JL.Public opinion and the democratic peace.American Political Science Review. 2013;107 (3):.
91. Trachtenberg MThe Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2006:.
92. Van Evera S.The cult of the offensive and the origins of the First World War.International Security. 1984;9 (1): 58-107.
93. Van Evera SGuide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1997:.
94. Van Evera SMA: Security Studies Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2009:.
95. Vasquez J,Leskiw CS.The origins and war proneness of interstate rivalries.Annual Review of Political Science. 2001;4:295-316.
96. Von Clausewitz COn War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1976:.
97. Waldner DTheory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations. Lebow RNLichbach MI, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:.
98. Walt SM.A model disagreement.International Security. 1999;24 (2): 115-130.
99. Weart SNever at War: Why Democracies Will Not Fight One Another. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1998:.
100. Review of International Political Economy. Weaver C, ed. 2009:.
101. Wohlforth WC.The stability of a unipolar world.International Security. 1999;24 (2): 5-41.
102. Wohlstetter A.The delicate balance of terror.Foreign Affairs. 1959;37 (2): 211-234.
103. Wolpin KThe limits of inference without theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2013:.
104. Wood EJ.Civil wars: What we don't know.Global Governance. 2003;9 (2): 247-260.
105. Yang DD.Qualitative methods syllabi.Qualitative Methods Newsletter. 2003;1 (1): 28-30.
106. Yanigazawa-Drott DHarvard University; 2010:.