The origins and war proneness of interstate rivalries

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 4, Issue , 2001, Pages 295-316

  Vasquez, John ^a   Leskiw, Christopher S ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Militarized disputes; Power politics; Rivalry; Territory; War

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035650326     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.295     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Achen CH. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
2. Anderson PA, McKeown TJ. 1987. Changing aspirations, limited attention, and war. World Polit. 40:1-29
3. Beck N, Katz JN, Tucker R. 1998. Taking time seriously: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 42:1260-88
4. Beck N, King G, Zeng L. 2000. Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: a conjecture. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:21-35
5. Beck N, Tucker R. 1996. Conflict in space and time: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., San Francisco
6. Bennett SD. 1996. Security, bargaining, and the end of interstate rivalry. Int. Stud. Q. 40:157-83
7. Bennett SD. 1998. Integrating and testing models of rivalry. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 42:1200-32
8. Bennett SD. 1999. Parametric models, duration dependence and time-varying data revisited. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 43:256-70
9. Bennett SD, Stam AC. 2000. Research design and estimator choices in the analysis of interstate dyads: when decisions matter. J. Confl. Resolut. 44:653-85
10. Bercovitch J, Diehl PF. 1997. Conflict management of enduring rivalries: frequency, timing and short-term impact of mediation. Int. Interact. 22:299-320
11. Blalock HM. 1960. Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill
12. Brecher M, Wilkenfeld J. 1997. A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
13. Bremer SA. 1980. National capabilities and war proneness. In The Correlates of War Vol. II, ed. JD Singer, pp. 57-82. New York: Free
14. Bremer SA. 1992. Dangerous dyads: conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. J. Confl. Resolut. 36:309-41
15. Bremer SA. 2000. Who fights whom, when, where, and why? In What Do We Know about War? See Vasquez 2000b, pp. 23-36
16. Bremer SA, Cusack TR, eds. 1995. The Process of War. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach
17. Bueno de Mesquita B. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
18. Bueno de Mesquita B. 1996. The benefits of a social science approach to studying international affairs. In Explaining International Relations Since 1945, ed. N Woods, New York: Oxford Univ. Press
19. Bueno de Mesquita B, Lalman D. 1988. Empirical support for systemic and dyadic explanations of conflict. World Polit. 41:1-20
20. Cioffi-Revilla C. 1998. The political uncertainty of interstate rivalries: a punctuated equilibrium model. In The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries, ed. PF Diehl, pp. 64-97. Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press
21. Diehl PF. 1985. Arms races to war: testing some empirical linkages. Sociol. Q. 26:331-49
22. Diehl PF, Goertz G. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
23. Gartner SS, Siverson RM. 1996. War expansion and war outcomes. J. Confl. Resolut. 40:4-15
24. Gartzke E, Simon M. 1999. Hot hand: a critical analysis of enduring rivalries. J. Polit. 61:777-98
25. Gibler DM. 1997. Control the issues, control the conflict: the effects of alliances that settle territorial issues on interstate rivalries. Int. Interact. 22:341-68
26. Gochman CS, Maoz Z. 1984. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: procedures, patterns, and insights J. Confl. Resolut. 28:585-616
27. Goertz G, Diehl PF. 1992. The empirical importance of enduring rivalries. Int. Interact. 18:151-63
28. Goertz G, Diehl PF. 1993. Enduring rivalries: theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. Int. Stud. Q. 37:147-71
29. Goertz G, Diehl PF. 1995. Taking "enduring" out of enduring rivalry: the rivalry approach to war and peace. Int. Interact. 21:291-308
30. Grieco JM. 1988. Anarchy and the limits of international cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. Int. Org. 42:485-507
31. Hensel P. 1996. The evolution of interstate rivalry. PhD thesis. Univ. Illinois, UrbanaChampaign
32. Hensel P. 1998. Interstate rivalry and the study of militarized conflict. In Conflict in World Politics: Advances in the Study of Crises, War and Peace, ed. F Harvey, B Mor, pp. 162-204. London: Macmillan
33. Huth PK. 1996a. Enduring rivalries and territorial disputes, 1950-1990. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 15:7-41
34. Huth PK. 1996b. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
35. Jones DM, Bremer SA, Singer JD. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Confl. Manage. Peace Sci. 15:163-213
36. Kegley CW, Skinner RJ. 1976. The case-for-analysis problem. In In Search of Global Patterns, ed. J Rosenau, pp. 303-18. New York: Free
37. King G, Keohane RO, Verba S. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
38. Larson DW. 1999. The US-Soviet rivalry. In Great Power Rivalries, ed. WR Thompson, pp. 371-89. Columbia: Univ. South Carolina Press
39. Leng R. 1983. When will they ever learn? Coercive bargaining in recurrent crises. J. Confl. Resolut. 27:379-419
40. Leng R. 2000. Bargaining and Learning in Recurring Crises: The Soviet-American, Egyptian-Israeli, and Indo-Pakistani Rivalries. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
41. Mansbach RW, Vasquez JA. 1981. In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
42. Maoz Z, Mor B. 1996. Enduring rivalries: the early years. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 17:141-60
43. Maoz Z, Mor B. 2001. International Hate Affairs: The Evolution of Enduring Rivalries. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press. In press
44. Morrow JD. 1989. Capabilities, uncertainty, and resolve: a limited information model. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 33:941-72
45. Rasler K, Thompson WR. 2000. Explaining rivalry escalation to war: space, position, and contiguity in the major power subsystem. Int. Stud. Q. 44:503-30
46. Reed W. 2000. A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44:84-93
47. Russett B. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
48. Signorino CS. 1999. Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93:279-98
49. Singer JD. 1982. Confrontational behavior and escalation to war 1816-1980. A research plan. J. Peace Res. 19:37-48
50. Singer JD, Bremer SA, Stuckey J. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In Peace, War, and Numbers, ed. BM Russett, pp. 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
51. Small M, Singer JD. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
52. Smith A. 1999. Testing theories of strategic choice: the example of crisis escalation. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 43:1254-88
53. Thompson WR. 1988. On Global War. Columbia: Univ. South Carolina Press
54. Thompson WR. 1995. Principal rivalries. J. Confl. Resolut. 39:195-223
55. Thompson WR, ed. 1999. Great Power Rivalries. Columbia: Univ. South Carolina Press
56. Thompson WR. 2000a. Identifying rivals and rivalries: caveat emptor and chacun a son gout. Unpublished paper, Dep. Polit. Sci., Indiana Univ., Bloomington
57. Thompson WR. 2000b. Whither strategic rivalries? Unpubl. paper, Dep. Polit. Sci, Indiana Univ., Bloomington
58. Valeriano B. 2001. Steps to rivalry: power politics and rivalry initiation. Presented at Annu. Meet. Int. Stud. Assoc., Chicago
59. Vasquez J. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
60. Vasquez J. 1996. Distinguishing rivals that go to war from those that do not. Int. Stud. Q. 40:531-58
61. Vasquez J. 2000a. What do we know about war? See Vasquez 2000b, pp. 335-70
62. Vasquez J, ed. 2000b. What Do We Know About War? New York: Rowman & Littlefield
63. Wallace MD. 1982. Armaments and escalation: two competing hypotheses. Int. Stud. Q. 26:37-51
64. Wayman FW. 1983. Power transitions, rivalries, and war, 1816-1970. Unpubl. paper, Univ. Mich.
65. Wayman FW. 1996. Power shifts and the onset of war. In Parity and War, ed. J Kugler, D Lemke, pp. 145-62. Ann Arbor: Unpubl. paper, Univ. Mich.
66. Wayman FW. 2000. Rivalries: recurrent disputes and explaining war. See Vasquez 2000b, pp. 219-34
67. Wayman FW, Jones DM. 1991. Evolution of conflict in rivalries. Presented at Annu. Meet. Int. Stud. Assoc., Vancouver