Frequency and determinants of residents' narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: Narratives in numbers

Academic Medicine

Volumn 88, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1324-1331

  Van Der Leeuw, Renée M ^a   Overeem, Karlijn ^b   Arah, Onyebuchi A ^c   Heineman, Maas Jan ^a   Lombarts, Kiki M J M H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883618512     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829e3af4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Essed G.G., Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Acad Med. 2002; 77: 332-335. (Pubitemid 34311209)
2. Hore CT, Lancashire W, Fassett RG Clinical supervision by consultants in teaching hospitals. Med J Aust. 2009; 191:220-222.
3. Wilkerson L, Irby DM Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998; 73:387-396. (Pubitemid 28215045)
4. Westerman M, Teunissen PW, van der Vleuten C P, et al. Understanding the transition from resident to attending physician: A transdisciplinary, qualitative study. Acad Med. 2010; 85:1914-1919.
5. Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook D.A., Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19:971-977. (Pubitemid 39244515)
6. Lombarts KM, Bucx MJ, Arah OA Development of a system for the evaluation of the teaching qualities of anesthesiology faculty. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111:709-716.
7. van der Leeuw R, Lombarts K, Heineman MJ, Arah O. Systematic evaluation of the teaching qualities of obstetrics and gynecology faculty: Reliability and validity of the SETQ tools. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e19142.
8. Arah OA, Hoekstra JB, Bos A.P., Lombarts KM New tools for systematic evaluation of teaching qualities of medical faculty: Results of an ongoing multi-center survey. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e25983.
9. Boerebach BC, Arah OA, Busch O.R., Lombarts KM Reliable and valid tools for measuring surgeons' teaching performance: Residents' vs. self evaluation. J Surg Educ. 2012; 69:511-520.
10. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010; 44:101-108.
11. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007; 77:81-112.
12. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008; 78:153-189.
13. Burford B, Illing J, Kergon C., Morrow G, Livingston M. User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors. Med Educ. 2010; 44:165-176.
14. van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F, Driessen E.W., Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: Building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 24:703-719.
15. Myers KA, Zibrowski EM, Lingard L. A mixed-methods analysis of residents' written comments regarding their clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2011; 86(10 suppl):S21-S24.
16. Lombarts MJ, Arah OA, Busch O.R., Heineman MJ Using the SETQ system to evaluate and improve teaching qualities of clinical teachers [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010; 154:A1222.
17. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Series B. 1995; 57:289-300.
18. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat. 2000; 25:60-83.
19. Benjamini Y, Krieger A, Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika. 2006; 93:491-507. (Pubitemid 44599846)
20. Storey J. The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann Stat. 2003; 31:2013-2035. (Pubitemid 38293903)
21. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes M.D., Forrester JE Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157:364-375. (Pubitemid 36196757)
22. Frohna A, Stern D. The nature of qualitative comments in evaluating professionalism. Med Educ. 2005; 39:763-768. (Pubitemid 41076147)
23. Myers K, Zibrowski EM, Lingard L. Engaged at the extremes: Residents' perspectives on clinical teaching assessment. Acad Med. 2012; 87:1397-1400.
24. Richards SH, Campbell JL, Walshaw E, Dickens A., Greco M. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires. Med Educ. 2009; 43:757-766.
25. Bullock AD, Hassell A, Markham W.A., Wall DW, Whitehouse AB How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors. Med Educ. 2009; 43:516-520.
26. Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Meyers M.O., Feins RH, Farrell TM National trends in esophageal surgery - are outcomes as good as we believe? J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13:1900-1910.
27. Lee SL, Yaghoubian A, de Virgilio C. A multi-institutional comparison of pediatric appendicitis outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. J Surg Educ. 2011; 68:6-9.
28. Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KM Factors influencing residents' evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status. Med Educ. 2012; 46:381-389.
29. Canavan C, Holtman MC, Richmond M, Katsufrakis PJ The quality of written comments on professional behaviors in a developmental multisource feedback program. Acad Med. 2010; 85(10 suppl):S106-S109.