Mapping the zebrafish brain methylome using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing

Epigenetics

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 979-989

  Chatterjee, Aniruddha ^a,b   Ozaki, Yuichi ^c   Stockwell, Peter A ^c   Horsfield, Julia A ^a,b   Morison, Ian M ^a,b   Nakagawa, Shinichi ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Brain; CpG site; DNA methylation; MspI; RRBS; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

BISULFITE; DINUCLEOTIDE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPG ISLAND; DNA LIBRARY; FEMALE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HEREDITY; MALE; METHYLOME; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REDUCED REPRESENTATION BISULFITE SEQUENCING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALIA; DANIO RERIO; MAMMALIA; RATTUS;

BRAIN; CPG SITE; CPG10; DNA METHYLATION; MSPI; RRBS; ZEBRAFISH;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CPG ISLANDS; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENOME; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; RATS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84883524651     PISSN: 15592294     EISSN: 15592308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/epi.25797     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Elango N, Yi SV. DNA methylation and structural and functional bimodality of vertebrate promoters. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25:1602-8; PMID:18469331; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn110
2. Bock C, Beerman I, Lien WH, Smith ZD, Gu H, Boyle P, et al. DNA methylation dynamics during in vivo differentiation of blood and skin stem cells. Mol Cell 2012; 47:633-47; PMID:22841485; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.019
3. Macleod D, Clark VH, Bird A. Absence of genomewide changes in DNA methylation during development of the zebrafish. Nat Genet 1999; 23:139-40; PMID:10508504; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/13767
4. Carrel L, Willard HF. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature 2005; 434:400-4; PMID:15772666; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03479
5. Rollins RA, Haghighi F, Edwards JR, Das R, Zhang MQ, Ju J, et al. Large-scale structure of genomic methylation patterns. Genome Res 2006; 16:157-63; PMID:16365381; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gr.4362006
6. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9:465-76; PMID:18463664; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nrg2341
7. Igarashi J, Muroi S, Kawashima H, Wang X, Shinojima Y, Kitamura E, et al. Quantitative analysis of human tissue-specific differences in methylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 376:658-64; PMID:18805397; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. bbrc.2008.09.044
8. Chatterjee A, Morison IM. Monozygotic twins: genes are not the destiny? Bioinformation 2011; 7:369-70; PMID:22355239; http://dx.doi. org/10.6026/97320630007369
9. Baylin S, Bestor TH. Altered methylation patterns in cancer cell genomes: cause or consequence? Cancer Cell 2002; 1:299-305; PMID:12086841; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00061-2
10. Mirbahai L, Williams TD, Zhan H, Gong Z, Chipman JK. Comprehensive profiling of zebrafish hepatic proximal promoter CpG island methylation and its modification during chemical carcinogenesis. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:3; PMID:21205313; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-3
11. Bailey GS, Williams DE, Hendricks JD. Fish models for environmental carcinogenesis: the rainbow trout. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104(Suppl 1):5-21; PMID:8722107
12. Wardle FC, Odom DT, Bell GW, Yuan B, Danford TW, Wiellette EL, et al. Zebrafish promoter microarrays identify actively transcribed embryonic genes. Genome Biol 2006; 7:R71; PMID:16889661; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-8-r71
13. Berghmans S, Jette C, Langenau D, Hsu K, Stewart R, Look T, et al. Making waves in cancer research: new models in the zebrafish. Biotechniques 2005; 39:227-37; PMID:16116796; http://dx.doi. org/10.2144/05392RV02
14. Zon LI. Zebrafish: a new model for human disease. Genome Res 1999; 9:99-100; PMID:10022974
15. Lam SH, Gong Z. Modeling liver cancer using zebrafish: a comparative oncogenomics approach. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:573-7; PMID:16582610; http://dx.doi. org/10.4161/cc.5.6.2550
16. Lam SH, Wu YL, Vega VB, Miller LD, Spitsbergen J, Tong Y, et al. Conservation of gene expression signatures between zebrafish and human liver tumors and tumor progression. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24:73-5; PMID:16327811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1169
17. Lieschke GJ, Currie PD. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:353-67; PMID:17440532; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nrg2091
18. Wu SF, Zhang H, Hammoud SS, Potok M, Nix DA, Jones DA, et al. DNA methylation profiling in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 2011; 104:327-39; PMID:21924171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374814-0.00018-5
19. Goll MG, Halpern ME. DNA methylation in zebrafish. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2011; 101:193-218; PMID:21507352; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387685-0.00005-6
20. Jiang L, Zhang J, Wang JJ, Wang L, Zhang L, Li G, et al. Sperm, but not oocyte, DNA methylome is inherited by zebrafish early embryos. Cell 2013; 153:773-84; PMID:23663777; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2013.04.041
21. Potok ME, Nix DA, Parnell TJ, Cairns BR. Reprogramming the maternal zebrafish genome after fertilization to match the paternal methylation pattern. Cell 2013; 153:759-72; PMID:23663776; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.030
22. Mhanni AA, McGowan RA. Global changes in genomic methylation levels during early development of the zebrafish embryo. Dev Genes Evol 2004; 214:412-7; PMID:15309635; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00427-004-0418-0
23. Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, Chen PY, Bostick M, Goll MG, et al. Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:8689-94; PMID:20395551; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002720107
24. Andersen IS, Reiner AH, Aanes H, Aleström P, Collas P. Developmental features of DNA methylation during activation of the embryonic zebrafish genome. Genome Biol 2012; 13:R65; PMID:22830626; http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r65
25. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:191-203; PMID:20125086; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nrg2732
26. Meissner A, Mikkelsen TS, Gu H, Wernig M, Hanna J, Sivachenko A, et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 2008; 454:766-70; PMID:18600261
27. Gertz J, Varley KE, Reddy TE, Bowling KM, Pauli F, Parker SL, et al. Analysis of DNA methylation in a three-generation family reveals widespread genetic influence on epigenetic regulation. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1002228; PMID:21852959; http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002228
28. Bock C, Kiskinis E, Verstappen G, Gu H, Boulting G, Smith ZD, et al. Reference Maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell 2011; 144:439-52; PMID:21295703; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2010.12.032
29. Steine EJ, Ehrich M, Bell GW, Raj A, Reddy S, van Oudenaarden A, et al. Genes methylated by DNA methyltransferase 3b are similar in mouse intestine and human colon cancer. J Clin Invest 2011; 121:1748-52; PMID:21490393; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/ JCI43169
30. Iwamoto K, Bundo M, Ueda J, Oldham MC, Ukai W, Hashimoto E, et al. Neurons show distinctive DNA methylation profile and higher interindividual variations compared with non-neurons. Genome Res 2011; 21:688-96; PMID:21467265; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/gr.112755.110
31. Lubin FD, Roth TL, Sweatt JD. Epigenetic regulation of BDNF gene transcription in the consolidation of fear memory. J Neurosci 2008; 28:10576-86; PMID:18923034; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.1786-08.2008
32. Ma DK, Marchetto MC, Guo JU, Ming GL, Gage FH, Song H. Epigenetic choreographers of neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13:1338-44; PMID:20975758; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nn.2672
33. Migliore L, Coppedè F. Genetics, environmental factors and the emerging role of epigenetics in neurodegenerative diseases. Mutat Res 2009; 667:82-97; PMID:19026668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm. 2008.10.011
34. Samaco RC, Neul JL. Complexities of Rett syndrome and MeCP2. J Neurosci 2011; 31:7951-9; PMID:21632916; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.0169-11.2011
35. Mill J, Tang T, Kaminsky Z, Khare T, Yazdanpanah S, Bouchard L, et al. Epigenomic profiling reveals DNA-methylation changes associated with major psychosis. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82:696-711; PMID:18319075; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ajhg.2008.01.008
36. Guo Y, Monahan K, Wu H, Gertz J, Varley KE, Li W, et al. CTCF/cohesin-mediated DNA looping is required for protocadherin α promoter choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:21081-6; PMID:23204437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219280110
37. Chatterjee A, Stockwell PA, Rodger EJ, Morison IM. Comparison of alignment software for genome-wide bisulphite sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:e79; PMID:22344695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gks150
38. Hartung T, Zhang L, Kanwar R, Khrebtukova I, Reinhardt M, Wang C, et al. Diametrically opposite methylome-transcriptome relationships in high-and low-CpG promoter genes in postmitotic neural rat tissue. Epigenetics 2012; 7:421-8; PMID:22415013; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/epi.19565
39. Shimoda N, Yamakoshi K, Miyake A, Takeda H. Identification of a gene required for de novo DNA methylation of the zebrafish no tail gene. Dev Dyn 2005; 233:1509-16; PMID:15937923; http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/dvdy.20455
40. Goll MG, Anderson R, Stainier DY, Spradling AC, Halpern ME. Transcriptional silencing and reactivation in transgenic zebrafish. Genetics 2009; 182:747-55; PMID:19433629; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics. 109.102079
41. Rai K, Huggins IJ, James SR, Karpf AR, Jones DA, Cairns BR. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 2008; 135:1201-12; PMID:19109892; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.042
42. Xie W, Barr CL, Kim A, Yue F, Lee AY, Eubanks J, et al. Base-resolution analyses of sequence and parentof-origin dependent DNA methylation in the mouse genome. Cell 2012; 148:816-31; PMID:22341451; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.035
43. Wang J, Xia Y, Li L, Gong D, Yao Y, Luo H, et al. Double restriction-enzyme digestion improves the coverage and accuracy of genome-wide CpG methylation profiling by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. BMC Genomics 2013; 14:11; PMID:23324053; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-11
44. Kettleborough RN, Busch-Nentwich EM, Harvey SA, Dooley CM, de Bruijn E, van Eeden F, et al. A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function. Nature 2013; 496:494-7; PMID:23594742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature11992
45. Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, Muffato M, et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 2013; 496:498-503; PMID:23594743; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12111
46. Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag DL. A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:1412-7; PMID:16432200; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510310103
47. Takai D, Jones PA. Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:3740-5; PMID:11891299; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052410099
48. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 1987; 196:261-82; PMID:3656447; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9
49. Irizarry RA, Ladd-Acosta C, Wen B, Wu Z, Montano C, Onyango P, et al. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo-and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat Genet 2009; 41:178-86; PMID:19151715; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ng.298
50. Doi A, Park IH, Wen B, Murakami P, Aryee MJ, Irizarry R, et al. Differential methylation of tissueand cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. Nat Genet 2009; 41:1350-3; PMID:19881528; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.471
51. Laurent L, Wong E, Li G, Huynh T, Tsirigos A, Ong CT, et al. Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res 2010; 20:320-31; PMID:20133333; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gr.101907.109
52. Shukla S, Kavak E, Gregory M, Imashimizu M, Shutinoski B, Kashlev M, et al. CTCF-promoted RNA polymerase II pausing links DNA methylation to splicing. Nature 2011; 479:74-9; PMID:21964334; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10442
53. Hahn MA, Wu X, Li AX, Hahn T, Pfeifer GP. Relationship between gene body DNA methylation and intragenic H3K9me3 and H3K36me3 chromatin marks. PLoS One 2011; 6:e18844; PMID:21526191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018844
54. Aran D, Toperoff G, Rosenberg M, Hellman A. Replication timing-related and gene body-specific methylation of active human genes. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20:670-80; PMID:21112978; http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/hmg/ddq513
55. Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, Hawkins RD, Hon G, Tonti-Filippini J, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 2009; 462:315-22; PMID:19829295; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08514
56. Bird A, Tate P, Nan X, Campoy J, Meehan R, Cross S, et al. Studies of DNA methylation in animals. J Cell Sci Suppl 1995; 19:37-9; PMID:8655645; http://dx.doi. org/10.1242/jcs.1995.Supplement_19.5
57. Jjingo D, Conley AB, Yi SV, Lunyak VV, Jordan IK. On the presence and role of human gene-body DNA methylation. Oncotarget 2012; 3:462-74; PMID:22577155
58. Bogdanovic O, Fernandez-Miñán A, Tena JJ, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Hidalgo C, van Kruysbergen I, et al. Dynamics of enhancer chromatin signatures mark the transition from pluripotency to cell specification during embryogenesis. Genome Res 2012; 22:2043-53; PMID:22593555; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gr.134833.111
59. Marsman J, Horsfield JA. Long distance relationships: enhancer-promoter communication and dynamic gene transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1819:1217-27; PMID:23124110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. bbagrm.2012.10.008
60. Kriukiene E, Liutkeviciute Z, Klimašauskas S. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine-the elusive epigenetic mark in mammalian DNA. Chem Soc Rev 2012; 41:6916-30; PMID:22842880; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ c2cs35104h
61. Chatterjee A, Rodger EJ, Stockwell PA, Weeks RJ, Morison IM. Technical considerations for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing with multiplexed libraries. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012; 2012:741542; PMID:23193365; http://dx.doi. org/10.1155/2012/741542
62. Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:1571-2; PMID:21493656; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167
63. Akalin A, Kormaksson M, Li S, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, et al. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genomewide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol 2012; 13:R87; PMID:23034086; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ gb-2012-13-10-r87
64. Xin Y, Chanrion B, O'Donnell AH, Milekic M, Costa R, Ge Y, et al. MethylomeDB: a database of DNA methylation profiles of the brain. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40(Database issue):D1245-9; PMID:22140101; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1193
65. Smith ZD, Gu H, Bock C, Gnirke A, Meissner A. High-throughput bisulfite sequencing in mammalian genomes. Methods 2009; 48:226-32; PMID:19442738; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.05.003