Dynamics of enhancer chromatin signatures mark the transition from pluripotency to cell specification during embryogenesis

Genome Research

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2043-2053

  Bogdanović, Ozren ^a   Fernandez Miñán, Ana ^a   Tena, Juan J ^a   De La Calle Mustienes, Elisa ^a   Hidalgo, Carmen ^a   Van Kruysbergen, Ila ^a   Van Heeringen, Simon J ^b   Veenstra, Gert Jan C ^b   Gómez Skarmeta, José Luis ^a  

^a Departamento de Biología Molecular e Ingeniería Bioquímica   (Spain)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; HISTONE H3 LYSINE 27; HISTONE H3 LYSINE 4; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GASTRULATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HISTONE ACETYLATION; HISTONE METHYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ZEBRA FISH;

ACETYLATION; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; GASTRULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME; HISTONES; PROTEIN BINDING; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; ZEBRAFISH;

DANIO RERIO; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84867158452     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.134833.111     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aday AW, Zhu LJ, Lakshmanan A, Wang J, Lawson ND. 2011. Identificationof cis regulatory features in the embryonic zebrafish genome throughlarge-scale profiling of H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 binding sites. Dev Biol357: 450-462.
2. Bauer S, Grossmann S, Vingron M, Robinson PN. 2008. Ontologizer 2.0 - a multifunctional tool for GO term enrichment analysis and dataexploration. Bioinformatics 24: 1650-1651. (Pubitemid 351966169)
3. Bessa J, Tena JJ, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Fernandez-Minan A, Naranjo S, Fernandez A, Montoliu L, Akalin A, Lenhard B, Casares F, et al. 2009. Zebrafish enhancer detection (ZED) vector: A new tool to facilitatetransgenesis and the functional analysis of cis-regulatory regions inzebrafish. Dev Dyn 238: 2409-2417.
4. Blader P, Lam CS, Rastegar S, Scardigli R, Nicod JC, Simplicio N, Plessy C, Fischer N, Schuurmans C, Guillemot F, et al. 2004. Conserved andacquired features of neurogenin1 regulation. Development 131: 5627-5637. (Pubitemid 39625206)
5. Blankenberg D, Taylor J, Schenck I, He J, Zhang Y, Ghent M, VeeraraghavanN, Albert I, Miller W, Makova KD, et al. 2007. A framework forcollaborative analysis of ENCODE data: Making large-scale analysesbiologist-friendly. Genome Res 17: 960-964. (Pubitemid 46919731)
6. Blow MJ, McCulley DJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer-Frick I, Shoukry M, Wright C, Chen F, et al. 2010. ChIP-Seq identification ofweakly conserved heart enhancers. Nat Genet 42: 806-810.
7. Bonn S, Zinzen RP, Girardot C, Gustafson EH, Perez-Gonzalez A, DelhommeN, Ghavi-Helm Y, Wilczynski B, Riddell A, Furlong EE. 2012. Tissue- specificanalysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures ofenhancer activity during embryonic development. Nat Genet 44: 148-156.
8. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, Robertson M, Vrana J, Jones K, Grotewold L, Smith A. 2007. Nanog safeguards pluripotencyand mediates germline development. Nature 450: 1230-1234.
9. Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG, Kooistra T, Carey BW, Steine EJ, Hanna J, Lodato MA, Frampton GM, Sharp PA, et al. 2010. HistoneH3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predictsdevelopmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 21931-21936.
10. Dahl JA, Reiner AH, Klungland A, Wakayama T, Collas P. 2010. Histone H3lysine 27 methylation asymmetry on developmentally-regulatedpromoters distinguish the first two lineages in mouse preimplantationembryos. PLoS ONE 5: e9150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009150.
11. Domazet-Loso T, Tautz D. 2010. A phylogenetically based transcriptome ageindex mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature 468: 815-818.
12. Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, Shoresh N, Ward LD, Epstein CB, ZhangX, Wang L, Issner R, Coyne M, et al. 2011. Mapping and analysis ofchromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473: 43-49.
13. Gaulton KJ, Nammo T, Pasquali L, Simon JM, Giresi PG, Fogarty MP, PanhuisTM, Mieczkowski P, Secchi A, Bosco D, et al. 2010. A map of openchromatin in human pancreatic islets. Nat Genet 42: 255-259.
14. Grinberg I, Northrup H, Ardinger H, Prasad C, Dobyns WB, Millen KJ. 2004. Heterozygous deletion of the linked genes ZIC1 and ZIC4 is involved inDandy-Walker malformation. Nat Genet 36: 1053-1055. (Pubitemid 41184463)
15. Guo G, Huss M, Tong GQ, Wang C, Li Sun L, Clarke ND, Robson P. 2010. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expressionanalysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev Cell 18: 675-685.
16. Hawkins RD, Hon GC, Yang C, Antosiewicz-Bourget JE, Lee LK, Ngo QM, Klugman S, Ching KA, Edsall LE, Ye Z, et al. 2011. Dynamic chromatinstates in human ES cells reveal potential regulatory sequences and genesinvolved in pluripotency. Cell Res 21: 1393-1409.
17. Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, Ching CW, Hawkins RD, Barrera LO, Van Calcar S, Qu C, Ching KA, et al. 2007. Distinct and predictivechromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in thehuman genome. Nat Genet 39: 311-318. (Pubitemid 46328487)
18. Heintzman ND, Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Kheradpour P, Stark A, Harp LF, Ye Z, Lee LK, Stuart RK, Ching CW, et al. 2009. Histone modifications athuman enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459: 108-112.
19. Irie N, Kuratani S. 2011. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealsvertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis. Nat Commun 2: 248.doi: 10.1038/ncomms1248.
20. Jowett T, Lettice L. 1994. Whole-mount in situ hybridizations on zebrafishembryos using a mixture of digoxigenin- and fluorescein-labelledprobes. Trends Genet 10: 73-74.
21. Kalinka AT, Varga KM, Gerrard DT, Preibisch S, Corcoran DL, Jarrells J, OhlerU, Bergman CM, Tomancak P. 2010. Gene expression divergencerecapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature 468: 811-814.
22. Kawakami K. 2004. Transgenesis and gene trap methods in zebrafish byusing the Tol2 transposable element. Methods Cell Biol 77: 201-222.
23. Keller MJ, Chitnis AB. 2007. Insights into the evolutionary history of thevertebrate zic3 locus from a teleost-specific zic6 gene in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Dev Genes Evol 217: 541-547. (Pubitemid 47322121)
24. Kim TK, Hemberg M, Gray JM, Costa AM, Bear DM, Wu J, Harmin DA, Laptewicz M, Barbara-Haley K, Kuersten S, et al. 2010. Widespreadtranscription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature 465:182-187.
25. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. 1995. Stagesof embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203: 253-310.
26. Lim LS, Loh YH, Zhang W, Li Y, Chen X, Wang Y, Bakre M, Ng HH, StantonLW. 2007. Zic3 is required for maintenance of pluripotency inembryonic stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 18: 1348-1358. (Pubitemid 46626629)
27. Nishimoto S, Nishida E. 2007. Fibroblast growth factor 13 is essential forneural differentiation in Xenopus early embryonic development. J BiolChem 282: 24255-24261. (Pubitemid 47328049)
28. Ong CT, Corces VG. 2011. Enhancer function: New insights into theregulation of tissue-specific gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 12: 283-293.
29. Pauli A, Valen E, Lin MF, Garber M, Vastenhouw NL, Levin JZ, Fan L, Sandelin A, Rinn JL, Regev A, et al. 2012. Systematic identification oflong noncoding RNAs expressed during zebrafish embryogenesis. Genome Res 22: 577-591.
30. Pekowska A, Benoukraf T, Zacarias-Cabeza J, Belhocine M, Koch F, Holota H, Imbert J, Andrau JC, Ferrier P, Spicuglia S. 2011. H3K4 tri- methylationprovides an epigenetic signature of active enhancers. EMBO J 30: 4198-4210.
31. Rada-Iglesias A, Bajpai R, Swigut T, Brugmann SA, Flynn RA, Wysocka J.2011. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmentalenhancers in humans. Nature 470: 279-283.
32. Sakabe NJ, Nobrega MA. 2010. Genome-wide maps of transcriptionregulatory elements. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2: 422-437.
33. Sandelin A, Alkema W, Engstrom P, Wasserman WW, Lenhard B. 2004. JASPAR: An open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factorbinding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D91-D94. (Pubitemid 38081611)
34. Santos-Rosa H, Schneider R, Bannister AJ, Sherriff J, Bernstein BE, Emre NC, Schreiber SL, Mellor J, Kouzarides T. 2002. Active genes are trimethylatedat K4 of histone H3. Nature 419: 407-411.
35. Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Spieth J, Hillier LW, Richards S, et al. 2005. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 15: 1034-1050. (Pubitemid 41126859)
36. Sprague J, Bayraktaroglu L, Clements D, Conlin T, Fashena D, Frazer K, Haendel M, Howe DG, Mani P, Ramachandran S, et al. 2006. TheZebrafish Information Network: The zebrafish model organismdatabase. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D581-D585.
37. Tang F, Barbacioru C, Bao S, Lee C, Nordman E, Wang X, Lao K, Surani MA.2010. Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cellmass by single-cell RNA-Seq analysis. Cell Stem Cell 6: 468-478.
38. Taylor J, Schenck I, Blankenberg D, Nekrutenko A. 2007. Using galaxy toperform large-scale interactive data analyses. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics38: 10.5.1-10.5.47.
39. Tjian R, Maniatis T. 1994. Transcriptional activation: A complex puzzle withfew easy pieces. Cell 77: 5-8. (Pubitemid 24184680)
40. Visel A, Blow MJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer-Frick I, ShoukryM, Wright C, Chen F, et al. 2009. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specificactivity of enhancers. Nature 457: 854-858.
41. Wang C, Hennessey JA, Kirkton RD, Graham V, Puranam RS, Rosenberg PB, Bursac N, Pitt GS. 2011. Fibroblast growth factor homologous factor 13regulates Na+ channels and conduction velocity in murine hearts. CircRes 109: 775-782.
42. Wardle FC, Odom DT, Bell GW, Yuan B, Danford TW, Wiellette EL, Herbolsheimer E, Sive HL, Young RA, Smith JC. 2006. Zebrafishpromoter microarrays identify actively transcribed embryonic genes. Genome Biol 7: R71. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-8-r71.
43. Ware SM, Peng J, Zhu L, Fernbach S, Colicos S, Casey B, Towbin J, BelmontJW. 2004. Identification and functional analysis of ZIC3 mutations inheterotaxy and related congenital heart defects. Am J Hum Genet 74: 93-105. (Pubitemid 38085241)
44. Ware SM, Harutyunyan KG, Belmont JW. 2006. Zic3 is critical for earlyembryonic patterning during gastrulation. Dev Dyn 235: 776-785.
45. Xu C, Fan ZP, Muller P, Fogley R, Dibiase A, Trompouki E, Unternaehrer J, Xiong F, Torregroza I, Evans T, et al. 2012. Nanog-like regulatesendoderm formation through the Mxtx2-Nodal pathway. Dev Cell 22:625-638.
46. Ye T, Krebs AR, Choukrallah MA, Keime C, Plewniak F, Davidson I, Tora L.2011. seqMINER: An integrated ChIP-seq data interpretation platform. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1287.
47. Zentner GE, Tesar PJ, Scacheri PC. 2011. Epigenetic signatures distinguishmultiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. GenomeRes 21: 1273-1283.
48. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, NusbaumC, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq(MACS). Genome Biol 9: R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137.