Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context

Vision Research

Volumn 85, Issue , 2013, Pages 80-89

  Giesbrecht, Barry ^a   Sy, Jocelyn L ^b   Guerin, Scott A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Context; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Learning; Memory; Visual attention; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT CONTEXTUAL LEARNING; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SPATIAL LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL SEARCH;

EID: 84883401140     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Aminoff E., Gronau N., Bar M. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:1493-1503.
2. Astafiev S.V., Shulman G.L., Stanley C.M., Snyder A.Z., Van Essen D.C., Corbetta M. Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:4689-4699.
3. Bar M., Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003, 38:347-358.
4. Bohbot V.D., Iaria G., Petrides M. Hippocampal function and spatial memory: Evidence from functional neuroimaging in health participants and performance of patients with medial temporal lobe resections. Neuropsychology 2004, 18:418-425.
5. Bohbot V.D., Kalina M., Stepankova K., Spackova N., Petrides M., Nadel L. Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:1217-1238.
6. Brefczynski J.A., DeYoe E.A. A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:370-374.
7. Bressler S.L., Tang W., Sylvester C.M., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Top-down control of visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:10056-10061.
8. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 2006, 59:1177-1187.
9. Burock M.A., Buckner R.L., Woldorff M.G., Rosen B.R., Dale A.M. Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI. Neuroreport 1998, 9(16):3735-3739.
10. Chun M.M. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:170-178.
11. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36(1):28-71.
12. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science 1999, 10:360-365.
13. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Implicit, long-term, spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:224-234.
14. Chun M.M., Phelps E.A. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2(9):844-847.
15. Chun M.M., Turk-Browne N.B. Interactions between attention and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17:177-184.
16. Cohen N.J., Eichenbaum H. Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Colby C.L., Goldberg M.E. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1999, 22:319-349.
18. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95(3):831-838.
19. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Ollinger J.M., McAvoy M.P., Shulman G.L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:292-297.
20. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences 1999, 353:1353-1362.
21. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
22. Dux P.E., Ivanoff J., Asplund C.L., Marois R. Isolation of the central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI. Neuron 2006, 21:1109-1120.
23. Eckstein M.P., Drescher B.A., Shimozaki S.S. Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science 2006, 17:973-980.
24. Eichenbaum H., Bunsey M. On the binding of associations in memory: Clues from studies on the role of the hippocampal region in paired associate learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1995, 4:19-23.
25. Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996, 99:225-234.
26. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J., Poline J.-P., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping 1995, 2:189-210.
27. Gibson E.J. Principles of perceptual learning and development 1969, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
28. Giesbrecht B., Woldorff M.G., Song A.W., Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage 2003, 19:496-512.
29. Gitelman D.R., Nobre A.C., Parrish T.B., LaBar K.S., Kim Y.H., Meyer J.R., et al. A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: Further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 6):1093-1106.
30. Greene A.J., Gross W.L., Elsinger C.L., Rao S.M. Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: An fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. Learning and Memory 2007, 14:548-553.
31. Grent-'t Jong T., Woldorff M.G. Timing and sequence of brain activity in top-down control of visual-spatial attention. PLoS Biology 2007, 5:114-126.
32. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:14-23.
33. Hannula D.E., Greene A.J. The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: At a tipping point?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:1-20.
34. Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11:523-532.
35. Hollingworth A. Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:273-291.
36. Hopf J.M., Luck S.J., Girelli M., Hagner T., Mangun G.R., Scheich H., et al. Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10(12):1233-1241.
37. Hopfinger J.B., Buonocore M.H., Mangun G.R. The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(3):284-291.
38. Iglói K., Doeller C.F., Berthoz A., Rondi-Reig L., Burgess N. Lateralized human hippocampal activity predicts navigation based on sequence or place memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2010, 107:14466-14471.
39. Jiang Y., Chun M.M. Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 4:1105-1124.
40. Jiang Y., Kanwisher N. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:1080-1094.
41. Johnson J.S., Woodman G.F., Braun E., Luck S.J. Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:834-839.
42. Kastner S., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science 1998, 282(5386):108-111.
43. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999, 22(4):751-761.
44. Kobayashi Y., Amaral D.G. Macaque monkey retrosplenial cortex: II. Cortical afferents. Journal of Comparative Neurology 2003, 466:48-79.
45. Kunar M.A., Flusberg A., Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:816-828.
46. Kverga K., Ghuman A.S., Kassam K.S., Aminoff E.A., Hämäläinen M.S., Chaumon M., et al. Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2011, 108:3389-3394.
47. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:476-490.
48. Luck S.J., Girelli M., McDermott M.T., Ford M.A. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 33:64-87.
49. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1000-1014.
50. Mack S.C., Eckstein M.P. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. Journal of Vision 2011, 11:9.
51. Manelis A., Reder L.M. Procedural learning and associative memory mechanisms contribute to contextual cueing: Evidence from fMRI and eye-tracking. Learning and Memory 2012, 9:527-534.
52. Manns J.R., Squire L.R. Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus 2001, 11:776-782.
53. Marois R., Larson J.M., Chun M.M., Shima D. Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex. Psychological Research 2006, 70:436-447.
54. Moores E., Laiti L., Chelazzi L. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:182-189.
55. Moscovitch M., Nadel L., Winocur G., Gilboa A., Rosenbaum R.S. The cognitive neuroscience of remote episodic, semantic, and spatial memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:179-190.
56. Müri R.M., Rivaud S., Timsit S., Corniu P., Pierrot-Deseilligny C. The role of the right medial temporal lobe in the control of memory-guided saccades. Experimental Brain Research 1994, 101:165-168.
57. Neider M.B., Zelinsky G.J. Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research 2006, 46:614-621.
58. Olivers C.N.L. Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance. Acta Psychologica 2011, 137:243-247.
59. Ollinger J.M., Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. II. Analysis. Neuroimage 2001, 13:218-229.
60. Ollinger J.M., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. I. The method. Neuroimage 2001, 13:210-217.
61. Olson I.R., Chun M.M. Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:273-302.
62. Olson I.R., Chun M.M., Allison T. Contextual guidance of attention: Human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. Brain 2001, 124(Pt 7):1417-1425.
63. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F. Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics 2001, 63:1239-1249.
64. Pollmann S., Manginelli A.A. Early implicit contextual change detection in anterior prefrontal cortex. Brain Research 2009, 1263:87-92.
65. Pollmann S., Manginelli A.A. Repeated contextual search cues lead to reduced BOLD-Onset times in early visual and left inferior frontal cortex. The Open Neuroimaging Journal 2010, 4:9-15.
66. Preston A.R., Gabrieli J.D. Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:2192-2207.
67. Rowe J.B., Toni I., Josephs O., Frackowiak R.S., Passingham R.E. The prefrontal cortex: Response selection or maintenance within working memory?. Science 2000, 288(5471):1656-1660.
68. Rushworth M.F.S., Nixon P.D., Renowden S., Wade D.T., Passingham R.E. The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1261-1273.
69. Rushworth M.F.S., Paus T., Sipila P.K. Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:5262-5271.
70. Schumacher E.H., D'Esposito M. Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 17:193-201.
71. Slotnick S.D., Moo L.R., Segal J.B., Hart J. Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:75-82.
72. Squire L.R. Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review 1992, 99:195-231.
73. Squire L.R., Ojemann J.G., Miezin F.M., Petersen S.E., Videen T.O., Raichle M.E. Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: A functional anatomical study of memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1992, 89:1837-1841.
74. Summerfield J.J., Lepsien J., Gitelman D.R., Mesulam M.M., Nobre A.C. Orienting attention based on long-term experience. Neuron 2006, 49:905-916.
75. Szczepanski S.M., Konen C.S., Kastner S. Mechanisms of spatial attention control in frontal and parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:148-160.
76. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 2006, 113:766-786.
77. Tseng Y., Chiang-Shan R.L. Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2004, 66:1363-1378.
78. Turk-Browne N.B., Yi D.-J., Chun M.M. Linking implicit and explicit memory: Common encoding factors and shared representations. Neuron 2006, 49:917-927.
79. Turk-Browne N.B., Yi D.-J., Leber A.B., Chun M.M. Visual quality determines the direction of neural repetition effects. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:425-433.
80. Vul E., Harris C., Winkielman P., Pashler H. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives in Psychological Science 2009, 4:274-290.
81. Westerberg C.E., Miller B.B., Reber P.J., Cohen N.J., Paller K.A. Neural correlates of contextual cueing are modulated by explicit learning. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3439-3447.
82. Woldorff M.G., Hazlett C.J., Fichtenholtz H.M., Weissman D.H., Anders A.M., Song A.W. Functional parcellation of attentional control regions of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(1):149-165.
83. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 1999, 400:867-869.
84. Yantis S., Schwarzbach J., Serences J.T., Carlson R.L., Steinmetz M.A., Pekar J.J., et al. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:995-1002.
85. Zhao G., Liu Q., Jiao J., Zhou P., Li H., Sun H. Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings. Journal of Vision 2012, 12:1-13.