Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex

Psychological Research

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 436-447

  Marois, R ^a   Larson, J M ^a   Chun, M M ^a,b   Shima, D ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

fMRI; Pre motor cortex; PRP

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BLOOD; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE NET; OXYGEN; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 33750016548     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0022-6     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: some behaviorial and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In: Heuer H., Sanders A. F. (eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 395-419.
2. Arnell K. M., & Duncan J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognit Psychol 44:105-147.
3. Boussaoud D. (2001). Attention versus intention in the primate pre-motor cortex. NeuroImage, 14: S40-45.
4. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J. Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform, 21, 109-127.
5. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In: Shapiro K. (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. Oxford University Press, NewYork, pp. 20-35.
6. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 19, 965-980.
7. Decary, A., & Richer, F. (1995). Response selection deficits in frontal excisions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1243-1253.
8. D'Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., Alsop, D. C, Shin, R. K., Atlas, S., & Grossman, M. (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature, 378, 279-281.
9. Dreher, J. C., & Grafman, J. (2003). Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 329-339.
10. Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2002). Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate, Physiol & Behav, 77, 677-682.
11. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
12. Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Cognitive Sci, 23, 475-483.
13. Durston, S., Davidson, M.C., Thomas, K.M., Worden, M.S., Tottenham, N., Martinez, A., Watts, R., Ulug, A.M., & Casey, B.J. (2003). Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 20, 2135-2141.
14. Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance Medicine, 33, 636-647.
15. Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cognit Sci, 5, 10-16.
16. Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Neural activation during response competition. J Cognit Neurosci, 12, 118-129.
17. Herath, P., Klingberg, T., Young, J., Amunts, K., & Roland, P. (2001). Neural correlates of dual task interference can be dissociated from those of divided attention; an fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 796-805.
18. Hernandez, A., Zainos, A., & Romo, R. (2002). Temporal evolution of a decision-making process in medial pre-motor cortex. Neuron, 33, 959-972.
19. Ivry, R. B., Franz, E. A., Kingstone, A., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 24, 463-480.
20. Jiang, Y. (2004) Resolving dual-task interference; an fMRI study. Neuroimage 22, 748-754.
21. Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003a). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1082-1094.
22. Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003b). Common neural mechanisms for response selection and perceptual processing. J Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1095-1110.
23. Jiang, Y., Saxe, R. & Kanwisher, N. (2004) Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychol Sci 15, 390-396.
24. Jolicoeur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Tasksub-1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
25. Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 25, 596-616.
26. Jolicoeur, P., Dell' Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing. OU Press, New York, pp. 82-99.
27. Kantowitz, B. H. (1974). Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Erlbaum, Potomac, pp. 83-131.
28. Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Q J Exp Psychol, 20, 167-178.
29. Kimura, D. (1993). Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Kurata, K., Tsuji, T., Naraki, S., Seino, M., & Abe, Y. (2000). Activation of the dorsal pre-motor cortex and pre-supplementary motor area of humans during an auditory conditional motor task. J Neurophysiol, 84, 1667-1672.
31. Lee, K. M., Chang, K.-H., & Roh, J. K. (1999). Subrogions within the supplementary motor area activated at different stages of movement preparation and execution. NeuroImage, 9, 117-123.
32. Luck, S. J. (1998). Sources of dual-task interference: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci, 9, 223-227.
33. MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
34. Marois, R., Chun, M. M., & Gore, J. C. (2000). Neural correlates of the attentional blink. Neuron, 28, 299-308.
35. Marois, R., Chun, M. M., & Gore, J. C. (2004). A common parieto-frontal network is recruited under both low visibility and high perceptual interference. J. Neurophysiol, 92, 2985-2992.
36. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci, 24, 167-202.
37. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion. Cognit Psychol, 44, 193-251.
38. Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 19, 1292-1312.
39. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognit Psychol, 21, 469-514.
40. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychol Bull, 116, 220-244.
41. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The Psychology of Attention. MIT, Cambridge.
42. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Q J Exp Psychol, 41A, 19-45.
43. Pashler, H., Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mangun, G. R., O'Brien, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1994). Sequential operation of disconnected cerebral hemispheres in split-brain patients. Neuroreport, 5, 2381-2384.
44. Passingham, R. E. (1993). The Frontal Lobes and Voluntary Action. Oxford UP, Oxford.
45. Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (2001). Imaging the pre-motor areas. Curr Opinion Neurobiol, 11, 663-672.
46. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 18, 849-860.
47. Rowe, J. B., Toni, I., Josephs, O., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E. (2000). The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science, 288, 1656-1660.
48. Rushworth, M. F., Nixon, P. D., Renowden, S., Wade, D. T., & Passingham, R. E. (1997). The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1261-1273.
49. Rushworth, M. F., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2001a). Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 21, 5262-5271.
50. Rushworth, M. F. S., Krams, M., & Passingham, R. E. (2001b). The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: The distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cognit Neurosci, 13, 698-710.
51. Rushworth, M. F. S., Hadland, K. A., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2002). Role of the Human Medial Frontal Cortex in Task Switching: A Combined fMRI and TMS Study. J Neurophysiol, 87, 2577-2592.
52. Ruthruff, E., Miller, J., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept & Perform, 21, 552-570.
53. Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: temporal constraints in human information processing Oxford U Press, New York, pp. 100-123.
54. Schall, J. D. (2001). Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2, 33-42.
55. Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cognit Brain Res, 17, 733-746.
56. Schumacher, E. H., & D'Esposito, M. (2002). Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation. Hum Brain Mapping, 17, 193-201.
57. Schumacher, E. H., Elston, P.A., & D'Esposito, M. (2002). Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection. J. Cognit Neurosci, 15, 1111-1121.
58. Shapiro, K., Hillstrom, A. P., & Husain, M. (2002). Control of Visuotemporal Attention by Inferior Parietal and Superior Temporal Cortex. Curr Biol, 12, 1320-1325.
59. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
60. Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Muller, K., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of Executive Functions in Dual-Task Performance with fMRI. J Cognit Neurosci, 14, 1184-1199.
61. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, New York.
62. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D'Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 15855-15860.
63. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept and Perform, 29, 3-18.
64. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cognit Psychol, 33, 266-307.
65. Welford A. T. (1980). Thesingle channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction Time Academic Press, New York, pp. 215-252.
66. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and theory. Br J Psychol, 43, 2-19.
67. Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (2000). Arbitraty associations between antecedents and actions. Trends Neurosci, 23, 271-276.