Oculomotor correlates of context-guided learning in visual search

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1363-1378

  Tseng, Yuan Chi ^a   Li, Chiang Shan Ray ^a,b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b Yale University School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LEARNING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17944365115     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BALL, K. K., BEARD, B. L., ROENKER, D. L., MILLER, R. L., & GRIGGS, D. S. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 2210-2219.
2. CAVE, K. R. (1999). The feature-gate model of visual selection. Psychological Research, 62, 182-194.
3. CHUN, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
4. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
5. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
6. CHUN, M. M., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across views. Visual Cognition, 7, 65-81.
7. COHEN, A., IVRY, R. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 17-30.
8. CURRAN, T., & KEELE, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 189-202.
9. DANZIGER, S., KINGSTONE, A., & SNYDER, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
10. DESCHEPPER, B., & TREISMAN, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 27-47.
11. GIBSON, B. S., Li, L., SKOW, E., BROWN, K., & COOKE, L. (2000). Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory. Psychological Science, 11, 324-327.
12. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
13. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
14. HOLLINGWORTH, A., WILLIAMS, C. C., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychortomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 761-768.
15. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
16. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 272-285.
17. JIANG, Y., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124.
18. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
19. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
20. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
21. KRISTJÁNSSON, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
22. MAIOLI, C., BENAGLIO, I., SIRI, S., SOSTA, K., & CAPPA, S. (2001). The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: Evidence from eye movement recording. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 364-372.
23. OLSON, I. R., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1299-1313.
24. PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2001a). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
25. PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2001b). Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors. Visual Cognition, 8, 843-859.
26. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
27. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. PRINGLE, H. L., IRWIN, D. E., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 89-95.
29. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
30. SCIALFA, C. T., THOMAS, D. M., & JOFFE, K. M. (1994). Age differences in the useful field of view: An eye movement analysis. Optometry & Vision Science, 71, 736-742.
31. SEIPLE, W., SZLYK, J. P., YANG, S., & HOLOPIGIAN, K. (1996). Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent. Vision Research, 36, 1859-1866.
32. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
33. SHINODA, H., HAYHOE, M. M., & SHRIVASTAVA, A. (2001). What controls attention in natural environments? Vision Research, 41, 3535-3545.
34. SHORE, D. I., & KLEIN, R. M. (2000). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14, 59-75.
35. STADLER, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 674-685.
36. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
37. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
38. TURATTO, M., & GALFANO, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639-1643.
39. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
40. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). London: University College London Press.
41. WOLFE, J. M., & CAVE, K. R. (1990). Deploying visual attention: The guided search model. In A. Blake & T. Troscianko (Eds.), AI and the eye (pp. 79-103). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
42. YANTIS S., & JONIDES J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1505-1513.
43. ZELINSKY, G. J., RAO, R., HAYHOE, M., & BALLARD, D. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatio-temporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.
44. ZELINSKY, G. J., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1995). Why some search tasks take longer than others: Using eye movements to redefine reaction times. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 325-336). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
45. ZELINSKY, G. J., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 244-262.