The effects of hyaluronic acid incorporated as a wetting agent on lysozyme denaturation in model contact lens materials

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 323-333

  Weeks, Andrea ^a   Boone, Adrienne ^b   Luensmann, Doerte ^b   Jones, Lyndon ^a,b   Sheardown, Heather ^a,b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Contact lens; denaturation; hyaluronic acid; lysozyme; silicone hydrogel; wetting agent

Indexed keywords

ACID DISTRIBUTION; CARBODIIMIDE CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS MATERIAL; MODIFIED MATERIALS; POLY(2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE); RADIOLABELED PROTEINS; SILICONE HYDROGELS;

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENSES; CROSSLINKING; DENATURATION; ENZYMES; GELS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; ORGANIC ACIDS; PHEMA; SILICONES; SORPTION; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; WETTING AGENTS;

HYALURONIC ACID;

1 (3 DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYL) 3 ETHYLCARBODIIMIDE; HYALURONIC ACID; IODINE 125; LYSOZYME; POLYMACON; POLYMER; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICONE; WETTING AGENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME DENATURATION; HYDROGEL; MICROCOCCUS LUTEUS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT;

CONTACT LENS; DENATURATION; HYALURONIC ACID; LYSOZYME; SILICONE HYDROGEL; WETTING AGENT;

CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; HYALURONIC ACID; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MURAMIDASE; PROTEIN DENATURATION; WETTING AGENTS;

EID: 84883397225     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328212446936     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses III. Mucin. Biomaterials. 1986 ; 7: 9-16
2. Kidane A, Szabocsik JM, Park K. Accelerated study on lysozyme deposition on poly(HEMA) contact lenses. Biomaterials. 1998 ; 19: 2051-2055
3. Rapp J, Broich JR. Lipid deposits on worn soft contact lenses. CLAO. 1984 ; 10 (3). 235-239
4. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, et al. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 ; 29 (3). 362-373
5. Garrett Q, Chatelier RC, Griesser HJ, et al. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 1998 ; 19: 2175-2186
6. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO. 2001 ; 27 (2). 75-80
7. Hu J, Tartaglia L, Kohler J, et al. Gentle touch, a lens material resistant to protein deposition. CLAO. 1995 ; 21 (2). 93-95
8. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials. 1984 ; 5: 319-326
9. Moradi O, Modarress H, Noroozi M. Experimental study of albumin and lysozyme adsorption onto acrylic acid (AA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) surfaces. J Coll Interface Sci. 2004 ; 271: 16-19
10. Chen H, Brook MA, Chen Y, et al. Surface properties of PEO-silicone composites: reducing protein adsorption. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2005 ; 16 (4). 531-548
11. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. Contact Lens Assoc Ophthalmol. 1989 ; 15 (3). 185-188
12. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 ; 40 (5). 897-903
13. Carney FP, Morris CA, Milthorpe B, et al. In vitro adsorption of tear proteins to hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens. 2009 ; 6: 320-328
14. Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM, Valint PL, et al. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials. 2001 ; 22: 3257-3260
15. Myers RI, Larsen DW, Tsao M, et al. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci. 1991 ; 68 (10). 776-782
16. Bowers RWJ, Tighe BJ. Studies of the ocular compatibility of hydrogels. A review of the clinical manifestations of spoilation. Biomaterials. 1987 ; 8: 83-89
17. Furness EL, Ross A, Davis TP, et al. A hydrophobic interaction site for lysozyme binding to polyethylene glycol and model contact lens polymers. Biomaterials. 1998 ; 19: 1361-1369
18. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, et al. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vision Sci. 2000 ; 77: 503-510
19. Porazinski AD, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivits in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. CLAO. 1999 ; 25 (3). 142-147
20. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, et al. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis. Clin Exp Optom. 2002 ; 85 (3). 193-197
21. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, et al. Protein adsorption on hydrogels II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials. 1985 ; 6: 338-345
22. Refojo MF, Holly FJ. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: a possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J. 1977 ; 3: 23-35
23. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2006 ; 31: 787-796
24. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogels contact lens materials using a in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 ; 33 (3). 138-143
25. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 ; 29(1S): S75 - S79
26. Boone A, Heynen M, Joyce E, et al. Ex vivo protein deposition on bi-weekly silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 ; 86 (11). 1241-1249
27. Knudson CB, Knudson W. Cartilage proteoglycans. Sem Cell Dev Biol. 2001 ; 12: 69-78
28. Brewton RG, Mayne R. Mammalian vitreous humor contains networks of hyaluronan molecules: electron microscope analysis using the hyaluronan-binding region (G1) and aggrecan and link protein. Exp Cell Res. 1992 ; 198: 237-249
29. Leach JB, Schmidt CE. Characterization of protein release from photocrosslinkable hyaluronic acid-polyethylene glycol hydrogel tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005 ; 26: 125-135
30. Segura T, Anderson BC, Chung PH, et al. Crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels: a strategy to functionalize and pattern. Biomaterials. 2005 ; 26: 359-371
31. Ito T, Fraser IP, Yeo Y, et al. Anti-inflammatory function of an in situ cross-linkable conjugate hydrogel of hyaluronic acid and dexamethasone. Biomaterials. 2007 ; 28: 1788-1789
32. Lee H, Mok H, Lee S, et al. Target-specific intracellular delivery of siRNA using degradable hyaluronic acid nanogels. J Cont Release. 2007 ; 119: 245-252
33. Moriyama K, Ooya T, Yui N. Hyaluronic acid grafted with poly(ethylene glycol) as a novel peptide formulation. J Cont Release. 1999 ; 59: 77-86
34. Luo Y, Kirker KR, Prestwich GD. Cross-linked hyaluronic acid hydrogels films: new biomaterials for drug delivery. J Cont Release. 2000 ; 69: 169-184
35. Lim ST, Forbes B, Berry DJ, et al. In vivo evaluation of novel hyaluronan/chitosan microparticulate delivery systems for the nasal delivery of gentamicin in rabbits. Int J Pharm. 2002 ; 231: 73-82
36. Surendrakumar K, Martyn GP, Hodgers ECM, et al. Sustained release of insulin from sodium hyaluronate based dry powder formulations after pulmonary delivery to beagle dogs. J Cont Release. 2003 ; 91: 385-394
37. Yun YH, Goetz DJ, Yellen P, et al. Hyaluronan microspheres for sustained gene delivery and site-specific targeting. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25: 147-157
38. Yadav AK, Mishra P, Mishra AK, et al. Development and characterization of hyaluronic acid-anchored PLGA nanoparticulate carriers of doxorubicin. Nanomedicine. 2007 ; 3: 246-257
39. Choy EPY, Cho P, Benzie IFF, et al. Investigation of corneal effect of different artificial tears in a simulated dry eye condition using a novel porcine dry eye model (pDEM). Cornea. 2006 ; 25: 1200-1204
40. Barbault-Foucher S, Gref R, Russo P, et al. Design of poly-É"-caprolactone nanospheres coated with bioadhesive hyaluronic acid for ocular delivery. J Cont Release. 2002 ; 83: 365-375
41. Kyyronen K, Hume L, Benedetti L, et al. Methylprednisolone esters of hyaluronic acid in ophthalmic drug delivery: in vitro and in vivo release studies. Int J Pharm. 1992 ; 80: 161-169
42. Cho KY, Chung TW, Kim BC, et al. Release of ciprofloxacin from poloxamer-graft-hyaluronic acid hydrogels in vitro. Int J Pharm. 2003 ; 260: 83-91
43. Yokoi N, Komuro A, Nishida K, et al. Effectiveness of hyaluronan on corneal epithelial barrier function in dry eye. B J Ophthalmol. 1997 ; 81: 533-536
44. Aragona P, Papa V, Micali A, et al. Long term treatment with sodium hyaluronate-containing artificial tears reduces ocular surface damage in patients with dry eye. B J Ophthalmol. 2002 ; 86: 181-184
45. Johnson ME, Murphy PJ, Boulton M. Effectiveness of sodium hyaluronate eyedrops in the treatment of dry eye. Gr Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 ; 244: 109-112
46. Holzer MP, Tetz MR, Auffarth GU, et al. Effect of Healon 5 and 4 other viscoelastics substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after catarct surgery. J Cat Refract Surg. 2001 ; 27: 213-218
47. Van Beek M, Jones L, Sheardown H. Hyaluronic acid containing hydrogels for the reduction of protein adsorption. Biomaterials. 2008 ; 29: 780-789
48. Van Beek M, Weeks A, Jones L, et al. Immobilized hyaluronic acid containing model silicone hydrogels reduce protein adsorption. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008 ; 19 (11). 1425-1436
49. Wright EA, Payne KAP, Jowitt TA, et al. Preservation of human tear protein structure and function by a novel contact lens multipurpose solution containing protein-stabilizing agents. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 ; 38: 36-42
50. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, et al. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2004 ; 28 (1). 25-36
51. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, et al. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 ; 83 (3). 143-151
52. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1997 ; 16: 503-510
53. Luensmann D, Glasier MA, Zhang F, et al. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 ; 84 (9). 839-847
54. Luensmann D, Zhang F, Subbaraman L, et al. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res. 2009 ; 34: 683-697
55. Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, et al. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogels and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci. 2009 ; 20: 71-82
56. Keith DJ, Christensen MT, Barry JR, et al. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 ; 29 (2). 79-82
57. Ali M, Byrne ME. Controlled release of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid from molecularly imprinted hydrogel contact lenses. Pharm Res. 2009 ; 26 (3). 714-726
58. Vermette P, Meagher L. Interactions of phospholipid- and poly(ethylene glycol)-modified surfaces with biological systems: relation to physico-chemical properties and mechanisms. Coll Surf B: Biointer. 2003 ; 28: 153-198
59. Feng W, Brash JLB, Zhu S. Non-biofouling materials prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization grafting of 2-methacryloloxyethyl phophorylcholine: separate effects of graft density and chain length on protein repulsion. Biomaterials. 2006 ; 27: 847-855