Metabolo-proteomics to discover plant biotic stress resistance genes

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 522-531

  Kushalappa, Ajjamada C ^a   Gunnaiah, Raghavendra ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

CELL WALL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; METABOLOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CELL WALL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLOMICS; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84883261661     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Agrios G. Genetics of plant disease. Plant Pathology 2005, 125-174. Elsevier Academic Press. 5th edn.
2. Poland J.A., et al. Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:21-29.
3. Ballini E., et al. A genome-wide meta-analysis of rice blast resistance genes and quantitative trait loci provides new insights into partial and complete resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21:859-868.
4. Buerstmayr H., et al. QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat: a review. Plant Breed. 2009, 128:1-26.
5. Massman J., et al. Genome-wide association mapping of Fusarium head blight resistance in contemporary barley breeding germplasm. Mol. Breed. 2011, 27:439-454.
6. Aghnoum R., et al. Basal host resistance of barley to powdery mildew: connecting quantitative trait loci and candidate genes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23:91-102.
7. Danan S., et al. Construction of a potato consensus map and QTL meta-analysis offer new insights into the genetic architecture of late blight resistance and plant maturity traits. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11:16.
8. Hutton S.F., et al. Identification of QTL associated with resistance to bacterial spot race T4 in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:1275-1287.
9. Valdés-López O., et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling gene expression during the innate immunity response of soybean. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:1975-1986.
10. Ahuja I., et al. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17:73-90.
11. Vidhyasekaran P. Fungal Pathogenesis in Plants and Crops: Molecular Biology and Host Defense Mechanisms 2008, CRC Press.
12. Schauer N., Fernie A.R. Plant metabolomics: towards biological function and mechanism. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:508-516.
13. Fernie A.R., Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:39-48.
14. Allwood J.W., et al. Metabolomic technologies and their application to the study of plants and plant-host interactions. Physiol. Plant 2008, 132:117-135.
15. Quirino B., et al. Proteomic approaches to study plant-pathogen interactions. Phytochemistry 2010, 71:351-362.
16. Rampitsch C., Bykova N.V. Proteomics and plant disease: advances in combating a major threat to the global food supply. Proteomics 2012, 12:673-690.
17. St Clair D.A. Quantitative disease resistance and quantitative resistance loci in breeding. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48:247-268.
18. Spoel S.H., Dong X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12:89-100.
19. Bollina V., et al. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics application to identify quantitative resistance-related metabolites in barley against Fusarium head blight. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11:769-782.
20. Wang T., et al. Identification of seed proteins associated with resistance to pre-harvested aflatoxin contamination in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:267.
21. Geddes J., et al. Differential expression of proteins in response to the interaction between the pathogen Fusarium graminearum and its host, Hordeum vulgare. Proteomics 2008, 8:545-554.
22. Lloyd A.J., et al. Metabolomic approaches reveal that cell wall modifications play a major role in ethylene-mediated resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Plant J. 2011, 67:852-868.
23. Consonni C., et al. Tryptophan-derived metabolites are required for antifungal defense in the Arabidopsis mlo2 mutant. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:1544-1561.
24. Gunnaiah R., et al. Integrated metabolo-proteomic approach to decipher the mechanisms by which wheat QTL (Fhb1) contributes to resistance against Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e40695.
25. Liao M., et al. Identification of elicitor-responsive proteins in rice leaves by a proteomic approach. Proteomics 2009, 9:2809-2819.
26. Sharma N., et al. Towards identifying Brassica proteins involved in mediating resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans: a proteomics-based approach. Proteomics 2008, 8:3516-3535.
27. Mohammadi M., et al. Proteomic profiling of two maize inbreds during early gibberella ear rot infection. Proteomics 2011, 11:3675-3684.
28. Deslandes L., Rivas S. Catch me if you can: bacterial effectors and plant targets. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17:644-655.
29. de Jonge R., et al. How filamentous pathogens co-opt plants: the ins and outs of fungal effectors. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:400-406.
30. -) isolates of Fusarium graminearum. Plant Pathol. 2011, 61:509-521.
31. Whisson S., et al. Exploiting knowledge of pathogen effectors to enhance late blight resistance in potato. Potato Res. 2011, 54:325-340.
32. Li T., et al. Designer TAL effectors induce disease susceptibility and resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae in rice. Mol. Plant 2013, 10.1093/mp/sst1034.
33. Zadoks J.C., Schein R.D. Epidemiology and Plant Disease Management 1979, Oxford University Press.
34. Yang L., et al. Proteomic analysis of grapevine stem in response to Xylella fastidiosa inoculation. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 75:90-99.
35. Gibon Y., Rolin D. Aspects of experimental design for plant metabolomics experiments and guidelines for growth of plant material. Plant Metabolomics: Methods and Protocols 2012, 13-30. Humana Press. N.W. Hardy, R.D. Hall (Eds.).
36. Barros E., et al. Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8:436-451.
37. Catchpole G.S., et al. Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:14458-14462.
38. Lau A.P.S., et al. Ergosterol as a biomarker for the quantification of the fungal biomass in atmospheric aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:249-259.
39. Tian S., et al. Accurate assessment of wheat and triticale cultivar resistance to Septoria tritici and Stagonospora nodorum infection by biotin/avidin ELISA. Plant Dis. 2005, 89:1229-1234.
40. Parisi O., et al. Development of a quick quantitative real-time PCR for the in vivo detection and quantification of peach latent mosaic viroid. Plant Dis. 2011, 95:137-142.
41. Sankaran S., et al. A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 72:1-13.
42. Pechanova O., et al. Proteomic analysis of the maize rachis: potential roles of constitutive and induced proteins in resistance to Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin accumulation. Proteomics 2011, 11:114-127.
43. Amantonico A., et al. Analytical techniques for single-cell metabolomics: state of the art and trends. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398:2493-2504.
44. Álvarez-Sánchez B., et al. Metabolomics analysis I. Selection of biological samples and practical aspects preceding sample preparation. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29:111-119.
45. Oikawa A., et al. Effects of freeze-drying of samples on metabolite levels in metabolome analyses. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34:3561-3567.
46. Kim H.K., Verpoorte R. Sample preparation for plant metabolomics. Phytochem. Anal. 2010, 21:4-13.
47. De Vos R.C.H., et al. Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2:778-791.
48. Theodoridis G., et al. LC-MS based global metabolite profiling of grapes: solvent extraction protocol optimisation. Metabolomics 2012, 8:175-185.
49. Lisec J., et al. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1:387-396.
50. Fiehn O., et al. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:1157-1161.
51. Wang W., et al. Optimizing protein extraction from plant tissues for enhanced proteomics analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31:2032-2039.
52. Weckwerth W. Metabolomics: integrating the metabolome and the proteome for systems biology. Annu. Plant Rev. 2009, 35:258-289.
53. Kim H.K., et al. NMR-based plant metabolomics: where do we stand, where do we go?. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29:267-275.
54. Choi Y.H., et al. NMR metabolomics to revisit the tobacco mosaic virus infection in Nicotiana tobaccum leaves. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69:742-748.
55. Figueiredo A., et al. Transcriptional and metabolic profiling of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves unravel possible innate resistance against pathogenic fungi. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:3371-3381.
56. Cevallos-Cevallos J.M., et al. GC-MS metabolomic differentiation of selected citrus varieties with different sensitivity to citrus huanglongbing. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 53:69-76.
57. Allwood J.W., Goodacre R. An introduction to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry instrumentation applied in plant metabolomic analyses. Phytochem. Anal. 2010, 21:33-47.
58. Kaspar S., et al. MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry - an emerging technique in plant biology. Proteomics 2011, 11:1840-1850.
59. Matros A., et al. Recent progress in liquid chromatography-based separation and label-free quantitative plant proteomics. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:963-974.
60. Matsuda F., et al. MS/MS spectral tag-based annotation of non-targeted profile of plant secondary metabolites. Plant J. 2008, 57:555-577.
61. Boja E.S., Rodriguez H. Mass spectrometry-based targeted quantitative proteomics: achieving sensitive and reproducible detection of proteins. Proteomics 2012, 12:1093-1110.
62. Smith C.A., et al. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:779-787.
63. Pluskal T., et al. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:395.
64. Xia J., Wishart D.S. Web-based inference of biological patterns, functions and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6:743-760.
65. Iijima Y., et al. Metabolite annotations based on the integration of mass spectral information. Plant J. 2008, 54:949-962.
66. Kind T., Fiehn O. Seven golden rules for heuristic filtering of molecular formulas obtained by accurate mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:105.
67. Hegeman A.D., et al. Stable isotope assisted assignment of elemental compositions for metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:6912-6921.
68. Castellana N., Bafna V. Proteogenomics to discover the full coding content of genomes: a computational perspective. J. Proteomics 2010, 73:2124-2135.
69. Bollina V., et al. Identification of metabolites related to mechanisms of resistance in barley against Fusarium graminearum, based on mass spectrometry. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77:355-370.
70. Hamzehzarghani H., et al. Metabolite profiling coupled with statistical analyses for potential high-throughput screening of quantitative resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 30:24-36.
71. Hoehenwarter W., et al. A rapid approach for phenotype-screening and database independent detection of cSNP/protein polymorphism using mass accuracy precursor alignment. Proteomics 2008, 8:4214-4225.
72. Goodacre R., et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for data analysis in metabolomics. Metabolomics 2007, 3:231-241.
73. Johnson H.E., et al. The application of MANOVA to analyse Arabidopsis thaliana metabolomic data from factorially designed experiments. Metabolomics 2007, 3:517-530.
74. Kumaraswamy G.K., et al. Metabolomics technology to phenotype resistance in barley against Gibberella zeae. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 130:29-43.
75. Smoot M.E., et al. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:431-432.
76. Usadel B., et al. A guide to using MapMan to visualize and compare omics data in plants: a case study in the crop species, maize. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:1211-1229.
77. Ballester A.R., et al. Citrus phenylpropanoids and defence against pathogens. Part I: metabolic profiling in elicited fruits. Food Chem. 2013, 136:178-185.
78. Batovska D.I., et al. Preliminary study on biomarkers for the fungal resistance in Vitis vinifera leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165:791-795.
79. Machado A.R.T., et al. Metabolic profiling in the roots of coffee plants exposed to the coffee root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne exigua. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 134:431-441.
80. Sana T.R., et al. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis of the rice response to the bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Metabolomics 2010, 6:451-465.
81. Quanbeck S.M., et al. Metabolomics as a hypothesis-generating functional genomics tool for the annotation of Arabidopsis thaliana genes of "unknown function". Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3:15.
82. Tohge T., Fernie A.R. Combining genetic diversity, informatics and metabolomics to facilitate annotation of plant gene function. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5:1210-1227.
83. Matsuda F., et al. Dissection of genotype-phenotype associations in rice grains using metabolome quantitative trait loci analysis. Plant J. 2012, 70:624-636.
84. Winter G., Krömer J.O. Fluxomics - connecting 'omics' analysis and phenotypes. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 10.1111/1462-2920.12064.
85. Pandey S.P., Somssich I.E. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:1648-1655.
86. Marchive C., et al. Over-expression of VvWRKY1 in grapevines induces expression of jasmonic acid pathway-related genes and confers higher tolerance to the downy mildew. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e54185.
87. Bhuiyan N.H., et al. Role of lignification in plant defense. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4:158-159.
88. Scofield S.R., Nelson R.S. Resources for virus-induced gene silencing in the grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:152-157.
89. Muroi A., et al. Accumulation of hydroxycinnamic acid amides induced by pathogen infection and identification of agmatine coumaroyltransferase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2009, 230:517-527.
90. Ding L., et al. Resistance to hemi-biotrophic F. graminearum infection is associated with coordinated and ordered expression of diverse defense signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e19008.
91. Boutigny A.L., et al. Ferulic acid, an efficient inhibitor of type B trichothecene biosynthesis and Tri gene expression in Fusarium liquid cultures. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113:746-753.
92. Poppenberger B., et al. Detoxification of the Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol by a UDP-glucosyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:47905-47914.
93. Naoumkina M.A., et al. Genome-wide analysis of phenylpropanoid defence pathways. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11:829-846.
94. Kumaraswamy K.G., et al. Mass spectrometry based metabolomics to identify potential biomarkers for resistance in barley against Fusarium head blight (Fusarium graminearum). J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37:846-856.
95. Parker D., et al. Metabolomic analysis reveals a common pattern of metabolic re-programming during invasion of three host plant species by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant J. 2009, 59:723-737.
96. Aldini G., et al. An integrated high resolution mass spectrometric and informatics approach for the rapid identification of phenolics in plant extract. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:2856-2864.
97. Kou Y., Wang S. Broad-spectrum and durability: understanding of quantitative disease resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:181-185.
98. Jacobsen E., Schouten H. Cisgenesis: an important sub-invention for traditional plant breeding companies. Euphytica 2009, 170:235-247.
99. Shukla V.K., et al. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2009, 459:437-441.