Gender differences in research collaboration

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 811-822

  Abramo, Giovanni ^a   D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ^b   Murgia, Gianluca ^c  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Collaboration patterns; Gender; Research collaboration; University

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

BIBLIOMETRICS; COLLABORATION PATTERNS; GENDER; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS; UNIVERSITY;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84882959387     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Caprasecca A. Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics 2008, 79(3):517-539.
2. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Caprasecca A. The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. Scientometrics 2009, 81(1):137-156.
3. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Di Costa F. Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation?. Higher Education 2009, 57(2):155-171.
4. Abramo G., Cicero T., D'Angelo C.A. The impact of non-productive and top scientists on overall university research performance. Journal of Informetrics 2013, 7(1):166-175.
5. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Murgia G. The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: A field level analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2013, 7(2):442-454.
6. Ackers L. Managing relationships in peripatetic careers: Scientific mobility in the European Union. Women's Studies International Forum 2004, 27(3):189-201.
7. Archibugi D., Coco A. International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia. A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation 2004, 24(7):517-528.
8. Badar K., Hite J.H., Badir Y.F. Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: The case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics 2013, 94(2):755-775.
9. Bornmann L., Mutz R., Daniel H.D. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1(3):226-238.
10. Borrego A., Barrios M., Villarroya A., Frías A., Ollé C. Research output of Spanish postdoctoral scientists: Does gender matter?. Fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics, and journal of informetrics & ninth COLLNET meeting 2008, Institute for Library and Information Science, Berlin. H. Kretschmer, F. Havemann (Eds.).
11. Boschini A., Sjogren A. Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics 2007, 25(2):325-365.
12. Bozeman B., Corley E.A. Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 2004, 33(4):599-616.
13. Bozeman B., Gaughan M. How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy 2011, 40(10):1393-1402.
14. Breuning M., Sanders K. Gender and journal authorship in eight prestigious political science journals. PS Political Science and Politics 2007, 40(2):347-351.
15. Campion P., Shrum W. Gender and science in developing areas. Science, Technology, and Human Values 2004, 29(4):459-485.
16. Cole J.R., Zuckerman H. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in motivation and achievement 1984, 217-258. JAI Press, Greenwich. P. Maehr, M.W. Steinkmap (Eds.).
17. D'Angelo C.A., Giuffrida C., Abramo G. A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(2):257-269.
18. Ding W., Levin S., Stephan P., Winkler A. The impact of information technology on academic scientists' productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science 2010, 56(9):1439-1461.
19. Etzkowitz H., Kemelgor C., Uzzi B. Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Feldman S.D. Escape from the doll's house: Women in graduate and professional school education 1974, McGraw Hill, New York.
21. Ferber M.A., Teiman M. Are women economists at a disadvantage in publishing journal articles?. Eastern Economic Journal 1980, 6(3-4):189-193.
22. Fox M.F. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity. The outer circle: Women in the scientific community 1991, 188-204. W.W. Norton and Company, New York. H. Zuckerman, J. Cole, J. Bruer (Eds.).
23. Fox M.F. Research, international research collaboration, and gender equity. women's international research engineering summit (WIRES) survey. WIRES 2009 - Connecting women and completing the circuit of international research collaboration 2009.
24. Frehill L.M., Vlaicu S., Zippel K. International scientific collaboration: Findings from a study of NSF principal investigators 2010, National Science Foundation, Technical report.
25. Fuchs S., von Stebut J., Allmendinger J. Gender, science, and scientific organizations in Germany. Minerva 2001, 39(2):175-201.
26. Glanzel W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 2001, 51(1):69-115.
27. Grant L., Ward K.B. Gender and publishing in sociology. Gender & Society 1991, 5(2):207-223.
28. Katz J.S., Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 1997, 26(1):1-18.
29. Keashly L. Gender and conflict: What can psychology tell us?. Gender and conflict 1994, Hampton Press, Fairfax. A. Taylor, J.B. Miller (Eds.).
30. Kyvic S., Teigen M. Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1996, 21(1):54-71.
31. Larivière V., Vignola-Gagné E., Villeneuve C., Gelinas P., Gingras Y. Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Quebec university professors. Scientometrics 2011, 87(3):483-498.
32. Leahey E. Gender differences in productivity. Research specialization as a missing link. Gender & Society 2006, 20(6):754-780.
33. Ledin A., Bornmann L., Gannon F., Wallon G. A persistent problem: Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO Reports 2007, 8(11):982-987.
34. Liang X.F., Joy S., Bilimoria D., Perry S. Establishing advisor-advisee relationships: Impact of decision factors, schemas and time periods. Academy of Management Conference 2009.
35. Long J.S. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces 1990, 68(4):1297-1315.
36. Long J.S. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 1992, 71(1):159-178.
37. Mann H.B., Whitney D.R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1947, 18(1):50-60.
38. Mark S., Link H., Morahan P.S., Pololi L., Reznik V., Tropez-Sims S. Innovative mentoring programs to promote gender equity in academic medicine. Academic Medicine 2001, 76(1):39-42.
39. Marwell G., Rosenfeld R.A., Spilerman S. Geographic constraints on women's careers in academia. Science 1979, 205(4412):1225-1231.
40. McDowell J.M., Smith K.J. The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: Implications for academic promotions. Economic Inquiry 1992, 30(1):68-82.
41. McDowell J.M., Larry D., Singell, Stater M. Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Economic Inquiry 2006, 44(1):153-168.
42. Melkers J., Kiopa A. The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research 2010, 27(4):389-414.
43. Melin G., Persson O. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 1996, 36(3):363-377.
44. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159(3810):56-63.
45. Miller B.P., Sooryamoorthy R., Anderson M., Palackal A., Shrum W. gender and science in developing areas: Has the internet reduced inequality?. Social Science Quarterly 2006, 87(3):679-689.
46. Moed H.F. Citation analysis in research evaluation 2005, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4020-3713-9.
47. Moya Anegón F., Chinchilla Rodríguez Z., Corera Álvarez E., Gómez Crisóstomo R., González Molina A., Hassan Montero Y., Vargas Quesada B. Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española: 2007 2009, Fecyt, Madrid.
48. Naldi F., Vannini Parenti I. Scientific and technological performance by gender: A feasibility study on patents and bibliometric indicators 2002, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
49. NRC Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty. National Research Council of the National Academies 2009, The National Academies Press, Washington.
50. O'Leary V.E., Mitchell J.M. Women connecting with women: Networks and mentors in the United States. Storming the tower. Women in the academic world 1990, 108-128. Kogan Page, London. S. Stiver Lie, V.E. O'Leary (Eds.).
51. Olsen D., Maple S., Stage F. Women and minority faculty job satisfaction. Higher Education 1995, 66(3):267-292.
52. Poole M., Bornholt L., Summers F. An international study of the gendered nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations. Higher Education 1997, 34(3):373-396.
53. Prpic K. Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics 2002, 5(1):27-58.
54. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
55. Rees T. The Helsinki group on women and science: National policies on women and science in Europe 2002, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
56. Rhoten D., Pfirman S. Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy 2007, 36(1):56-75.
57. Rivellini G., Rizzi E., Zaccarin S. The science network in Italian population research: An analysis according to the social network perspective. Scientometrics 2006, 67(3):407-418.
58. Rosenfeld R.A., Jones J.A. Patterns and effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education 1987, 58(5):493-515.
59. Rossiter M.W. The Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science 1993, 23(2):325-341.
60. Sambunjak D., Straus S.E., Marusic A. Mentoring in academic medicine: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006, 296(9):1103-1115.
61. Seagram B., Gould J., Pyke S. An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education 1998, 39(3):28-31.
62. Shauman K.A., Xie Y. Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography 1996, 33(4):455-468.
63. Sonnert G. Gender differences in science careers 1995, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
64. Taylor S.W., Fender B.F., Burke K.G. Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal 2006, 72(4):846-859.
65. van Rijnsoever F.J., Hessels L.K., Vandeberg R.L.J. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy 2008, 37(8):1255-1266.
66. Wenneras C., Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 1997, 387(6631):341-343.
67. Zimmer A., Krimmer H., Stallmann F. Winners among losers: Zur feminisierung der Deutschen universitäten. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung 2006, 28(4):30-56.
68. Zippel K. How gender neutral are state policies on science and international mobility of academics?. Sociologica 2011, 5(1):1-18.