Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Ghana, Kenya, and India

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 459-485

  Campion, Patricia ^a   Shrum, Wesley ^b  

^a California Central Valley   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

African studies; Asian studies; Gender; International development; Scientists

Indexed keywords

EID: 4744374740     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243904265895     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adeola, Francis O. 1998. Cross-national environmentalism differentials: Empirical evidence from core and noncore nations. Society and Natural Resources 11 (June): 339-64.
2. Campion, Patricia, and Wesley Shrum. 2002. Environmental attitudes of scientists in Ghana, Kenya and Kerala: Evidence on NGOs and traditional research sectors. Journal of Asian and African Studies 37 (1): 17-42.
3. Cole, Jonathan. 1979. Fair science: Women in the scientific community. New York: Free Press.
4. De Roy, Olivier Coeur. 1997. The African challenge: Internet, networking and connectivity activities in a developing environment. Third World Quarterly 18: 883-98.
5. Eisenhart, Margaret A., and Elizabeth Finkel. 1998. Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Engelhard, Rutger. 1999a. Inter-networking for national agricultural systems in ACP countries: Making the Internet work. Wageningen, the Netherlands: CTA (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU).
7. _. 1999b. State of the art of the opportunities offered by new ICTs in the building of cooperation programmes in agricultural research for development. Paper presented at the European Forum on ARD, Wageningen, the Netherlands, April.
8. Everts, Saskia. 1998. Gender and technology: Empowering women, engendering development. London: Zed.
9. Fox, Mary Frank. 1995. Women and scientific careers. In Handbook of science, technology, and society, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald Markle, James Peterson, and Trevor Pinch, 205-23. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. _. 1999. Gender, hierarchy, and science. In Handbook of the sociology of gender, edited by Janet Salzman Chafetz, 441-57. New York: Kluwer.
11. _. 2000. Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments. Women's Studies Quarterly 28:47-61.
12. Franke, Richard W., and Barbara H. Chasin. [1989] 1994. Kerala: Radical reform as development in an Indian STATE. Oakland, CA: Institute for Food and Development Policy.
13. Heller, Patrick. 1996. Social capital as product of class mobilization and state intervention: Industrial workers in Kerala, India. World Development 24:1055-71.
14. Hurlbert, Jeanne, Valerie Haines, and John J. Beggs. 2000. Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations? American Sociological Review 65:598-618.
15. Iyer, Sundara Ramanatha, and Stuart MacPherson. 2000. Social development in Kerala: Illusion or reality? Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
16. Jeffrey, Robin. 1992. Politics, women, and well being: How Kerala became a model. London: Macmillan.
17. Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. The origin, history, and politics of the subject called "gender and science." In Handbook of science, technology, and society, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald Markle, James Peterson, and Trevor Pinch, 80-94. Newbury Park: Sage.
18. Long, J. Scott. 1990. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces 68:1297-315.
19. Long, J. Scott, and Mary Frank Fox. 1995. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21:45-71.
20. McIlwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson. 1992. Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21. Parayil, Govindan. 1996. The "Kerala model" of development: Development and sustainability in the third world. Third World Quarterly 17:941-57.
22. Reskin, Barbara. 1978. Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science, American Journal of Sociology 83:1235-43.
23. Rist, Gilbert. 1996. Le Développement, Histoire d'Une Croyance Occidentale. Paris: Presses de Science Po.
24. Rossiter, Margaret. 1982. Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Schiebinger, Londa. 1999. Has feminism changed science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Schott, Thomas. 1993. Science: Its origin and the globalization of institutions and participation, Science, Technology, and Human Values 18:196-208.
27. Shrum, Wesley, and Jack Beggs. 1997. Methodology for studying research networks in the developing world: Generating information for science and technology policy. Knowledge and Policy 9:62-85.
28. Shrum, Wesley, and Patricia Campion. 2000. Are scientists in developing countries isolated? Science, Technology, and Society 5:1-34.
29. Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Miller McPherson. 1993. You are who you know: A network approach to gender. In Theory on gender: Feminism on theory, edited by Paula England, 223-51. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
30. Sooryamoorthy, R. 1997. Consumption to consumerism in the context of Kerala. New Delhi, India: Classical.
31. Stamp, Patricia. 1989. Technology, gender, and power in Africa. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
32. Xie; Yu, and Kimberlee A. Shauman. 1998. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63:847-70.
33. Zernike, Kate. 2001. Nine universities will address sex inequities. New York Times (January 31), p. A11.
34. Zuckerman, Harriet, and Jonathan Cole. 1975. Women in American science. Minerva 13:82-102.
35. Zuckerman, Harriet, J. Cole, and J. Bruer, eds. 1991. The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York: Norton.