Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: Evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 365-374

  Schotter, Elizabath ^a   Ferreira, Victor ^a   Rayner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; Object naming; Parallel processing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SENSORY GATING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NAMES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY GATING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882942776     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028646     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed and random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
2. Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0.999375-32) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
3. Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Szekely, A., Andonova, E., Deves-covi, A.,.. Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 344-380. doi:10.3758/BF03196494
4. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects on Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.13
5. Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1-B14. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00138-X
6. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191-219. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0803_1
7. Henderson, J. M., & Siefert, A. B. C. (1999). The influence of enantiomor-phic transformation on transsaccadic object integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 243-255. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.243
8. Henderson, J. M., & Siefert, A. B. C. (2001). Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: Effects of spatial position and left-right orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 753-760. doi: 10.3758/BF03196214
9. Hollingworth, A., & Rasmussen, I. P. (2010). Binding objects to locations: The relationship between object files and visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 543-564. doi:10.1037/a0017836
10. Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Fias, W. (1995). Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 961-980. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.961
11. Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Madebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? Experimental Psychology, 56, 56-65. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.56
12. Madebach, A., Jescheniak, J., Oppermann, F., & Schriefers, H. (2010). Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptual-lexical system during speech planning. Poster presented at the 51st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
13. Malpass, D., & Meyer, A. S. (2010). The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: Evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 523-537. doi:10.1037/a0018522
14. Meyer, A. S. (2004). The use of eye tracking in studies of sentence generation. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 191-211). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
15. Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494-503. doi:10.3758/BF03193289
16. Meyer, A. S., & Dobel, C. (2003). Application of eye tracking in speech production research. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 253-272). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
17. Meyer, A. S., Ouellet, M., & Hacker, C. (2008). Parallel processing of objects in a naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 982-987. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.982
18. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2
19. Meyer, A. S., & van der Meulen, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 314-319. doi:10.3758/BF03212987
20. Morgan, J. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 428-442. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.428
21. Morgan, J. L., van Elswijk, G., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Extrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: Evidence from word probe experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 561-565. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.561
22. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.555
23. Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 359-377. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.001
24. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2008). Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 587-601. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.587
25. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Görges, F. (2010). Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 356-370. doi:10.1080/17470210902952480
26. Pashler, H. E. (1999). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.426
28. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
29. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
30. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
31. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
32. Schotter, E. (2011). Eye movements as an index of linguistic processing in language production. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 9, 16-23.
33. Strijkers, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Costa, A. (2011). Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 345-362. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.002
34. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37(A), 571-590.
35. Zelinsky, G. J., & Murphy, G. L. (2000). Synchronizing visual and language processing: An effect of object name length on eye movements. Psychological Science, 11, 125-131. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00227