Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior

Journal of Research on Adolescence

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 413-423

  Logis, Handrea A ^a   Rodkin, Philip C ^a   Gest, Scott D ^b   Ahn, Hai Jeong ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882674096     PISSN: 10508392     EISSN: 15327795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12033     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280-305.
2. Barry, C. M., & Wentzel, K. R. (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: The role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42, 153-163.
3. Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? How popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescence Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 586-595. doi:10.1111/jora.12048
4. Berger, C., & Rodkin, P. C. (2012). Group influences on individual aggression and prosociality: Early adolescents who change peer affiliations. Social Development, 21, 396-413.
5. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179.
6. de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, 607-627.
7. Bukowski, W. M. (2011). Popularity as a social concept: Meanings and significance. In A. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8. Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckermann, H. J., Gest, S. D., & Gariépy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior-Peer support or peer rejection. Developmental Psychology, 24, 815-823.
9. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25-56). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105.
11. Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health-risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967-983.
12. Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendships selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 1-13.
13. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2012). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0030098
14. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942-958.
15. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S. M., & Veenstra, R. (2008). Beyond the classroom norm: The influence of bullying of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289-1299.
16. Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189-214.
17. Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figureredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., ... Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598-623.
18. Ellis, W. E., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children's deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1240-1254.
19. Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205-220.
20. Farmer, T. W., Leung, M., Pearl, R., Rodkin, P. C., Cadwallader, T. W., & Van Acker, R. (2002). Deviant or diverse peer groups? The peer affiliations of aggressive elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 611-620.
21. Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1699-1710.
22. Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 288-296.
23. Gronlund, N. E. (1959). Sociometry in the classroom. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
24. Haselager, G. J. T., Hartup, W. W., van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A. (1998). Similarities between friends and nonfriends in middle childhood. Child Development, 69, 1198-1208.
25. Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97-132.
26. Kupersmidt, J. B., DeRoiser, M. E., & Patterson, C. P. (1995). Similarity as the basis for children's friendships: The roles of sociometric status, aggressive and withdrawn behavior, academic achievement, and demographic characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 439-452.
27. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130-147.
28. Marks, P. E. L., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Crick, N. R. (2012). Popularity contagion among adolescents. Social Development, 21, 501-521.
29. Mathys, C., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2013). Popularity as a moderator of peer selection and socialization of adolescent alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 513-523. doi:10.1111/jora.12031
30. Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306-347.
31. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
32. Peters, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., Riksen-Walraven, J. M., & Haselager, G. J. T. (2010). Best friends' preference and popularity: Association with aggression and prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 398-405.
33. Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). The role of proactive and reactive aggression in the formation and development of boys' friendships. Developmental Psychology, 36, 233-240.
34. Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., & Preciado, P. (2011). Manual for SIENA version 4.0 (version September 22, 2012). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nu_eld College. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/
35. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configuration. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.
36. Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2012). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0029389
37. Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305-314.
38. Schaefer, D. R., Light, J. M., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., & Martin, C. M. (2010). Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children. Social Networks, 32, 61-71.
39. Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. H. (2011). The high price of high status: Popularity as a mechanism of risk. In A. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 245-270). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Shi, B., & Xie, H. (2012). Popular and nonpopular subtypes of physically aggressive preadolescents: Continuity of aggression and peer mechanisms during the transition to middle school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58, 530-553.
41. Sijtsema, J. J., Lindenberg, S. M., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Do they get what they want or are they stuck with what they can get? Testing homophily against default selection for friendships of highly aggressive boys. The TRAILS study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 803-813.
42. Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 19, 515-534.
43. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
44. Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2011). Transformations in adolescent peer networks. In B. Laursen & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Relationship pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood (pp. 135-154). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
45. Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 399-412. doi:10.1111/jora.12070
46. Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598-618). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47. Witvliet, M., Olthof, T., Hoeksma, J. B., Goossens, F. A., Smits, M. S. I., & Koot, H. M. (2010). Peer group affiliation of students: The role of popularity, likeability, and behavioral similarity in bullying. Social Development, 19, 285-303.