Understanding popularity in the peer system

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 102-105

  Cillessen, Antonius H N ^a   Rose, Amanda J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer relations; Popularity; Social status

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544463368     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1998). (See References)
2. Asher, S.R., & Coie, J.D. (1990). (See References)
3. Kupersmidt, J.B., & Dodge, K.A. (Eds.). (2004). (See References)
4. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5. Asher, S.R., & Coie, J.D. (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.
7. Coie, J.D., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (1993). Peer rejection: Origins and effects on children's development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 89-92.
8. Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
9. Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
10. Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165.
11. Hawley, P.H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309.
12. Kupersmidt, J.B., & Dodge, K.A. (Eds.). (2004). Children's peer relations: From development to intervention to policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2002). Children's stereotypes of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
14. Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A.G. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144.
15. Rodkin, P.C., Farmer, T.W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.
16. Rose, A.J., Swenson, L.P., & Waller, E.M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378-387.
17. Rubin, K.H., Bukowski, W.M., & Parker, J.G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W Dämon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 619-700). New York: Wiley.
18. Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. In M.J. Elias & J.E. Zins (Eds.), Bullying, peer harassment, and victimization in the schools: The next generation of prevention (pp. 157-176). New York: Haworth Press.