Popularity as a moderator of peer selection and socialization of adolescent alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use

Journal of Research on Adolescence

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 513-523

  Mathys, Cécile ^a   Burk, William J ^b   Cillessen, Antonius H N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882622538     PISSN: 10508392     EISSN: 15327795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12031     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allen, J. P., Chango, J., Szwedo, D., Schad, M., & Marston, E. (2012). Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Development, 83, 337-350.
2. Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, C. F., Marsh, P. A., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents' success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 747-760.
3. Bot, S. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Knibbe, R. A. (2007). Sociometric status and social drinking: Observations of modeling and persuasion in young adult peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 929-941.
4. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179.
5. Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521-530.
6. de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 1-21.
7. Burk, W. J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2008). The co-evolution of early adolescent friendship networks, school involvement, and delinquent behaviors. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49, 499-522.
8. Burk, W. J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics: Selection and socialization in early-, middle- and late- adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Youth risk behavior survey. Atlanta, GA: Division of Adolescent and School Health.
10. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935-959.
11. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25-56). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105.
13. De la Haye, K., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D., Pollard, M., & Tucker, J. (2013). Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 474-486. doi:10.1111/jora.12018
14. DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Nurmi, J.-E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 464-473. doi:10.1111/jora.12017
15. Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 417-429.
16. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2012). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0030098
17. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942-958.
18. Fallu, J.-S., Brière, F. N., Vitaro, F., Cantin, S., & Borge, A. I. H. (2011). The influence of close friends on adolescent substance use: Does popularity matter? In A. Ittel, H. Merkens, & L. Stecher (Eds.), Jahrbuch Jugendforschung, vol. 10 (pp. 235-262). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
19. Huisman, C., & Bruggeman, J. (2012). The social network, socioeconomic background, and school type of adolescent smokers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 329-338.
20. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21. Johnson, P. B., Boles, S. M., Vaughan, R., & Kleber, H. D. (2000). The co-occurrence of smoking and binge drinking in adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 779-783.
22. Killeya-Jones, L. A., Nakajima, R., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitudinal study. Prevention Science, 8, 11-23.
23. Kirke, D. M. (2004). Chain reactions in adolescents cigarette, alcohol and drug use: Similarity through peer influence or the patterning of ties in peer networks? Social Networks, 26, 3-28.
24. Kiuru, N., Burk, W. J., Laursen, B., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: Disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 801-812.
25. Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction, 98, 37-55.
26. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
27. Logis, H., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H.-J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423. doi:10.1111/jora.12033
28. Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49-74.
29. Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vertiainen, E., & de Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32, 72-81.
30. Mercken, L., Steglich, C., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J., & Moore, L. (2012). A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools. Health Psychology, 31, 450-459.
31. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1986). Peer cluster theory: Drugs and the adolescent. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 17-22.
32. Pearson, M., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections, 27, 51-67.
33. Poulin, F., Dishion, T. J., & Haas, E. (1999). The peer influence paradox: Friendship quality and deviancy training within male adolescent friendships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 42-61.
34. Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.
35. Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., & Preciado Lopez, P. (2011). Manual for SIENA version 4.0. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.
36. van de Schoot, R., van der Velden, F., Boom, J., & Brugman, D. (2010). Can at-risk young adolescents be popular and antisocial? Sociometric status groups, antisocial behavior, gender and ethnic groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 583-592.
37. Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 215-247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related science (pp. 41-71). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & van de Bunt, G. G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
40. Steglich, C. E. G., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329-393.
41. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531-1543.
42. Urberg, K. A., Luo, Q., Pilgrim, C., & Degirmencioglu, S. M. (2003). A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: Individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1243-1256.
43. Valente, T. W., Unger, J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 323-329.
44. Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2011). Transformations in adolescent peer networks. In B. Laursen & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Relationship pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood (pp. 135-154). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
45. Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics. In B. Laursen T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.) Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598-618). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46. Wills, T. A., & Cleary, S. D. (1999). Peer and adolescent substance use among 6th-9th graders: Latent growth analyses of influence versus selection mechanisms. Health Psychology, 18, 453-463.