Strict liability versus negligence

Tort Law and Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-45

  Schäfer, Hans Bernd ^a   Müller Langer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881892576     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (146)

1. Adams, Michael (1985), Ökonomische Analyse der Gefährdungs-und Verschuldenshaftung (Economic Analysis of Strict and Fault Liability), Heidelberg: R.v Decker's/C.F. Müller.
2. Alpa, Guido (1976), 'Colpa e Responsabilità Oggettiva nella Prospettiva dell Analisi Economica del Diritto (Negligence and Strict Liability in an Economic Analysis of Law Perspective)', Politica del Diritto, 431-48.
3. Bakker, Bas B. and Cornelius G.M. Sterks (1988), 'Optimal Legal Standards in Negligence Based Liability Rules', De Economist, 136, 383-400.
4. Bar-Gill, Oren and Omri Ben-Shahar (2003), 'The Uneasy Case for Comparative Negligence', American Law and Economics Review, 5, 433-69.
5. Beard, T. Randolph (1990), 'Bankruptcy and Care Choice', RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 626-34.
6. Brown, John Prather (1973), 'Toward an Economic Theory of Liability', Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 323-50.
7. Burrows, Paul (1982), 'Idealised Negligence, Strict Liability and Deterrence', International Review of Law and Economics, 2, 165-72.
8. Cabrillo, Francisco (1994), 'Industrialización y Derecho de daños en la España del siglo XIX (Industrialization and Tort Law in XIXth Century Spain)', Revista de Historia Económica, 12, 591-609.
9. Cafaggi, Fabrizio (1995), 'La Nozione di Difetto ed il Ruolo dell'Informazione. Per l'Adozione di un Modello Dinamico-Relazionale di Difetto in una Prospettiva di Riforma (The Notion of Defect and the Role of Information. For the Adoption of a Dynamic-Relational Model of Defect in a Perspective of Reform)', Rivista Critica del Diritto Privato, 13, 447 ff.
10. Cafaggi, Fabrizio (1996), Profili della Colpa Relazionale (Outlines of Relational Fault), Padova: CEDAM.
11. Calabresi, Guido (1965), 'The Decision for Accidents: An Approach to Non-Fault Allocation of Costs', Harvard Law Review, 78, 713-45.
12. Calabresi, Guido (1970), The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis, New Haven: Yale University Press.
13. Calabresi, Guido and Jon T. Hirschoff(1972), 'Toward a Test for Strict Liability in Tort', Yale Law Journal, 81, 1054-85.
14. Centner, Terence J. (1989), 'Groundwater Quality Regulation: Implications for Agricultural Operations', Hamline Law Review, 15, 589-605.
15. Centner, Terence J. (1990), 'Blameless Contamination: New State Legislation Regulating Liability for Agricultural Chemicals in Groundwater', Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 45, 216-20.
16. Centner, Terence J. and Michael E. Wetzstein (1992), 'Agricultural Pesticide Contamination of Groundwater: Developing a "Right-to-Spray Law" for Blameless Contamination', Journal of Agricultural Taxation and Law, 14, 38-52.
17. Chapman, Bruce (1990), 'Punitive Damages as Aggravated Damages: The Case of Contract', Canadian Business Law Journal, 16, 269-80.
18. Chelius, James R. (1976), 'Liability for Industrial Accidents: A Comparison of Negligence and Strict Liability Systems', Journal of Legal Studies, 5, 293-309.
19. Cooter, Robert D. (1982), 'Economic Analysis of Punitive Damages', Southern California Law Review, 56, 79-101.
20. Cooter, Robert D., Lewis A. Kornhauser and D. Lane (1979), 'Liability Rules and Accidents: Some Results Regarding Limited Information and Public Bads', Bell Journal of Economics, 366 ff.
21. Cooter, Robert D. and Thomas Ulen (2004), Law and Economics, 4th edition, Boston: Pearson.
22. Craswell, Richard and John E. Calfee (1984), 'Some Effects of Uncertainty on Compliance with Legal Standards', Virginia Law Review, 70, 965-1003.
23. Craswell, Richard and John E. Calfee (1986), 'Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2, 279-303.
24. Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe and Gerrit De Geest (2006), 'When Will Judgment-proof Injurers Take too much Precaution?', International Review of Law and Economics, 26, 336-54.
25. Demougin, Dominique and Claude Fluet (1999), 'A Further Justification for the Negligence Rule', International Review of Law and Economics, 19, 33-45.
26. Demougin, Dominique and Claude Fluet (2006), 'Preponderance of Evidence', European Economic Review, 50, 963-76.
27. Endres, Alfred (1991), Ökonomische Grundlagen des Haftungsrechts (Economic Fundaments of Liability Law), Heidelberg: Physica.
28. Endres, Alfred (1992), 'Strategic Behavior under Tort Law', International Review of Law and Economics, 12, 377-80.
29. Endres, Alfred and Regina Bertram (2006), 'The Development of Care Technology under Liability Law', International Review of Law and Economics, 26, 503-18.
30. Endres, Alfred and Andreas Lüdeke (1998), 'Incomplete Strict Liability: Effects on Product Differentiation and Information Provision', International Review of Law and Economics, 18, 511-28.
31. Endres, Alfred and Immo Querner (1995), 'On the Existence of Care Equilibria under Tort Law', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151, 348-57.
32. Epstein, Richard A. (1973), 'A Theory of Strict Liability', Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 151-204.
33. Epstein, Richard A. (1974), 'Defenses and Subsequent Pleas in a System of Strict Liability', Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 165-215.
34. Faure, Michael G. and Göran Skogh (1992), 'Compensation for Damages Caused by Nuclear Accidents: A Convention as Insurance', Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 17, 499-513.
35. Faure, Michael G. and Roger Van den Bergh (1987a), 'Efficiënties van het Foutcriterium in het Belgisch Aansprakelijkheidsrecht (Efficiencies of the Fault Criterion in Belgian Liability Law)', Rechtskundig Weekblad, 51, 11-19.
36. Faure, Michael G. and Roger Van den Bergh (1987b), 'Negligence, Strict Liability and Regulation of Safety under Belgian Law: An Introductory Economic Analysis', Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 12, 95-114.
37. Feess, Eberhard and Ansgar Wohlschlegel (2006), 'Liability and Information Transmission: The Advantage of Negligence-based Rules', Economics Letters, 92, 63-7.
38. Feldman, Allan M. and John M. Frost (1998), 'A Simple Model of Efficient Tort Liability Rules', International Review of Law and Economics, 18, 201-15.
39. Finsinger, Jörg and Mark V. Pauly (1990), 'The Double Liability Rule', Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 15, 159-70.
40. Finsinger, Jörg and Philip von Randow (1991), 'Neue Aktivitäten und Haftungsregeln, zugleich ein Beitrag zur ökonomischen Analyse des Nachbarrechts (New Activities and Liability Rules)', in Claus Ott and Hans-Bernd Schäfer (eds), Ökonomische Probleme des Zivilrechts, Berlin: Springer, pp. 87-108.
41. Frech, H. Edward III (1994), 'State-dependent Utility and the Tort System as Insurance: Strict Liability versus Negligence', International Review of Law and Economics, 14, 261-72.
42. Friehe, Tim (2007), 'Victim Interdependence in the Accident Setting', Working Paper, University of Tübingen, 1-17.
43. Gallo, Paolo (1993), 'Appunti in Tema di Colpevolezza, Colpa Soggettiva ed Efficienza Economica (in occasione di alcune recenti pubblicazioni) (Notes about Liability, Subjective Fault and Economic Efficiency on the Occasion of Some Recent Publications)', Quadrimestre, 712-32.
44. Garoupa, Nuno and Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci (2009), 'Least-Cost Avoidance: The Tragedy of Common Safety', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25, forthcoming.
45. Geistfeld, Mark (1995), 'Manufacturer Moral Hazard and the Tort-Contract Issue in Products Liability', International Review of Law and Economics, 15, 241-57.
46. Gilles, Stephen G. (1992), 'Rule Based Negligence and the Regulation of Activity Levels', Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 319-63.
47. Goerke, Lazlo (2002), 'Accident Law: Efficiency May Require an Inefficient Standard', German Economic Review, 3, 43-51.
48. Goldberg, Victor P. (1994), 'Litigation Costs under Strict Liability and Negligence', Research in Law and Economics, 16, 1-15.
49. Grady, Mark F. (1983), 'A New Positive Theory of Negligence', Yale Law Journal, 92, 799-829.
50. Grady, Mark F. (1988), 'Why Are People Negligent?: Technology, Nondurable Precautions, and the Medical Malpractice Explosion', Northwestern University Law Review, 82, 293 ff.
51. Grady, Mark F. (1992), 'Better Medicine Causes More Lawsuits, and New Administrative Courts Will Not Solve the Problem: Review of Medical Malpractice on Trial by Paul C. Weiler', Northwestern University Law Review, 86, 1068 ff.
52. Grady, Mark F. (1994), 'Res Ipsa Loquitur and Compliance Error', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142, 887 ff. Reprinted in Robert L. Rabin (1995), Perspectives on Tort Law, New York: Aspen.
53. Haddock, David D. and Christopher Curran (1985), 'An Economic Theory of Comparative Negligence', Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 49-72.
54. Hand, Learned (1947), United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169 (2nd Cir. 1947).
55. Hasen, Richard L. (1990), 'Comment, Efficiency under Informational Asymmetry: The Effect of Framing on Legal Rules', UCLA Law Review, 38, 391 ff.
56. Hylton, Keith N. (1990a), 'The Influence of Litigation Costs on Deterrence under Strict Liability and under Negligence', International Review of Law and Economics, 10, 161-71.
57. Hylton, Keith N. (1990b), 'Costly Litigation and Legal Error under Negligence', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 433-52.
58. Hylton, Keith N. (1993), 'Litigation Cost Allocation Rules and Compliance with the Negligence Standard', Journal of Legal Studies, 22, 457-76.
59. Jain, Satish K. and Rajendra P. Kundu (2006), 'Characterization of Efficient Simple Liability Rules with Multiple Tortfeasors', International Review of Law and Economics, 26, 410-27.
60. Jain, Satish K. and Ram Singh (2002), 'Efficient Liability Rules: Complete Characterization', Journal of Economics, 75, 105-24.
61. Jansen, Nils (2004), 'Duties and Rights in Negligence: A Comparative and Historical Perspective on the European Law of Extracontractual Liability', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 443.
62. Johnston, Jason Scott (1987), 'Bayesian Fact-Binding and Efficiency: Toward an Economic Theory of Liability under Uncertainty', Southern California Law Review, 61, 137 ff.
63. Kahan, Marcel (1989), 'Causation and Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule', Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 427-47.
64. Kim, Jeong-Yoo (2006), 'Strict Liability versus Negligence when the Injurer's Activity Involves Positive Externalities', European Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 95-104.
65. Kobayashi, Bruce H. (1996), 'Strict Liability, Gun Control, and Sin Taxes', in William F. Shughart II (ed.), Taxing Choice: The Political Economy of Fiscal Discrimination, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
66. Kolstad, Charles D., Thomas S. Ulen and Gary V. Johnson (1990), 'Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements', American Economic Review, 80.
67. Kornhauser, Lewis A. (1989), 'Sharing Damages among Multiple Tortfeasors', Yale Law Journal, 98, 831-84.
68. Landes, William M. and Richard A. Posner (1980), 'Multiple Tortfeasors: An Economic Analysis', Journal of Legal Studies, 9, 517-55.
69. Landes, William M. and Richard A. Posner (1987), The Economic Structure of Tort Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Lando, Henrik (1996), 'Hvornår b¢r Objektivt Ansvar Gælde? Det Rets¢konomiske bud på et sæt af Kriterier for Objketivt Ansvar' (When Should Strict Liability Apply? The Law-and-Economics Answer)', Working Paper, Institute of Finance, University of Oslo.
71. Lee, Gary L. (1981), 'Strict Liability versus Negligence: An Economic Analysis of the Law of Libel', Brigham Young University Law Review, 398-406.
72. Levmore, Saul (1986), 'Rethinking Comparative Law: Variety and Uniformity in Ancient and Modern Tort Law', Tulane Law Review, 31, 235-87.
73. Low, Stuart and Janet Kiholm Smith (1992), 'The Relationship of Alternative Negligence Defense Rules to Ligitation Behavior and Tort Claim Disposition', Law and Social Inquiry, 17, 63-87.
74. Low, Stuart and Janet Kiholm Smith (1995), 'Decisions to Retain Attorneys and FileLawsuits: An Examination of the Comparative Negligence Rule in Accident Law', Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 535-57.
75. Markovits, Richard S. (1998), 'The Allocative Efficiency of Shifting from a "Negligence" System to a "Strict-Liability" Regime in our Highly-Pareto-Imperfect Economy: A Partial and Preliminary Third-Best-Allocative-Efficiency Analysis', Chicago-Kent Law Review, 73, 11, 30-33.
76. Miceli, Thomas J. (2000), 'Deterrence, Litigation Costs, and the Statute of Limitations for Tort Suits', International Review of Law and Economics, 20, 383-94.
77. Miceli, Thomas J. (2006), 'On Negligence Rules and Self-Selection', Review of Law and Economics, 2, 349-61.
78. Miceli, Thomas J. and Kathleen Segerson (2003), 'A Note on Optimal Care by Wealthconstrained Injurers', International Review of Law and Economics, 23, 273-84.
79. Nell, Martin and Andreas Richter (2003), 'The Design of Liability Rules for Highly Risky Activities -Is Strict Liability Superior When Risk Allocation Matters?', International Review of Law and Economics, 23, 31-47.
80. Newman, Harry A. and David W. Wright (1990), 'Strict Liability in a Principal-Agent Model', International Review of Law and Economics, 10, 219-31.
81. Orr, Daniel (1991), 'The Superiority of Comparative Negligence: Another Vote', Journal of Legal Studies, 20, 119-29.
82. Ott, Claus and Hans-Bernd Schäfer (1997), 'Negligence as Untaken Precaution, Limited Information, and Efficient Standard Formation in the Civil Liability System', International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 15-29.
83. Page, Talbot (1987), 'On Strict Liability: Reply to Hausman and to Schwartz', Ethics, 97, 817-20.
84. Parisi, Francesco (1993), 'Learned Hand Formula of Negligence', Digesto Civile, 10, 436-43.
85. Parisi, Francesco and Vincy Fon (2004), 'Comparative Causation', American Law and Economics Review, 6, 345-68.
86. Perry, Stephen R. (1988), 'The Impossibility of General Strict Liability', Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1, 147-71.
87. Polinsky, A. Mitchell (1980), 'Strict Liability vs. Negligence in a Market Setting', American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 70(2), 363-7.
88. Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Steven Shavell (2007), 'The Theory of Public Enforcement of Law', in A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell (eds), Handbook of Law and Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 403-54.
89. Posner, Richard A. (1972), 'A Theory of Negligence', Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 29-96.
90. Posner, Richard A. (1973), 'Strict Liability: A Comment', Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 205-21.
91. Posner, Richard A. (1979), 'Epstein's Tort Theory: A Critique', Journal of Legal Studies, 8, 457-75.
92. Posner, Richard A. (2005), 'The Supreme Court, 2004 Term -Foreword: A Political Court', Harvard Law Review, 119, 31-102.
93. Posner, Richard A. (2007), Economic Analysis of Law, 7th edition, New York: Aspen.
94. Priest, George L. (1991), 'The Modern Expansion of Tort Liability: Its Sources, its Effects, and its Reform', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(3), 31-50.
95. Rabin, Robert L. (1981), 'The Historical Development of the Fault Principle: A Reinterpretation', Georgia Law Review, 15, 925 ff. Reprinted in Robert L. Rabin (ed.) (1983), Perspectives on Tort Law, Boston: Little Brown, pp. 44-70.
96. Ramseyer, J. Mark and Nakazato Minoru (1989), 'The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in Japan', Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 263 ff.
97. Rizzo, Mario J. (1980), 'Law amid Flux: The Economics of Negligence and Strict Liability in Tort', Journal of Legal Studies, 9, 291-318.
98. Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1989), 'Dikes, Dams, and Vicious Hogs: Entitlement and Efficiency in Tort Law', Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 25-50.
99. Rosenberg, David (2007), 'The Judicial Posner on Negligence versus Strict Liability: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co', Harvard Law Review, 120, 1210-22.
100. Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1987), 'The Efficiency of Comparative Negligence', Journal of Legal Studies, 16, 375-94.
101. Sappington, David (1983), 'Limited Liability Contracts between Principal and Agent', Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 1-21.
102. Schäfer, Hans-Bernd (2004), 'Efficient Third Party Liability of Auditors in Tort Law and Contract Law', Supreme Court Economic Review, 12, 181-209.
103. Schäfer, Hans-Bernd and Claus Ott (1986), 'Begründung und Bemessung des Schadensersatzes wegen entgangener Sachnutzung (Foundation and Rating of the Compensation for Damage Because of Lost Utility of Property)', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 7, 613-24.
104. Schäfer, Hans-Bernd and Claus Ott (2004), The Economic Analysis of Civil Law, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
105. Schäfer, Hans-Bernd and Claus Ott (2005), Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts (Textbook on Economic Analysis of Civil Law), 4th edition, Heidelberg: Springer.
106. Schwartz, Gary T. (1981), 'Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth-Century America: A Reinterpretation', Yale Law Journal, 90, 1717-75.
107. Schwartz, Gary T. (1989), 'Objective and Subjective Standards of Negligence: Defining the Reasonable Person to Induce Optimal Care and Optimal Populations of Injurers and Victims', Georgetown Law Journal, 78, 241-79.
108. Schwartz, Gary T. (1992), 'The Beginning and the Possible End of the Rise of Modern American Tort Law', Georgia Law Review, 26, 601-702.
109. Schwartz, Gary T. (1993), 'Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in Workers' Compensation: the Recent California Experience', Maryland Law Review, 52, 983-1015.
110. Schwartz, Gary T. (1996), 'Weaver v. Ward', Texas Law Review, 74, 1271-5.
111. Schwartz, Warren F. (1988), 'Objective and Subjective Standards of Negligence: Defining the Reasonable Person to Induce Optimal Care and Optimal Populations of Injurers and Victims', Georgetown Law Journal, 76, 241 ff.
112. Shavell, Steven (1980), 'Strict Liability versus Negligence', Journal of Legal Studies, 9, 1-25.
113. Shavell, Steven (1987), Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
114. Shavell, Steven (2004), Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.
115. Shavell, Steven (2007), 'Liability for Accidents', in A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell (eds), Handbook of Law and Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 139-82.
116. Simon, Marilyn J., Robert G. Wolf and Jeffrey M. Perloff (1985), 'Product Safety, Liability Rules and Retailer Bankruptcy', Southern Economic Journal, 51, 1130-41.
117. Singh, Ram (2007), '"Causation-consistent" Liability, Economic Efficiency and the Law of Torts', International Review of Law and Economics, 27, 179-203.
118. Sloan, Frank A., Bridget A. Reilly and Christoph M. Schenzler (1995), 'Effects of Tort Liability and Insurance on Heavy Drinking and Drinking and Driving', Journal of Law and Economics, 38, 49-77.
119. Smith, Steven D. (1984), 'Rhetoric and Rationality in the Law of Negligence', Minnesota Law Review, 69, 277-323.
120. Stout, Lynn A. and David D. Barnes (1992), Economic Analysis of Tort Law, St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
121. Teitelbaum, Joshua C. (2007), 'A Unilateral Accident Model under Ambiguity', Journal of Legal Studies, 36, 431-77.
122. Trimarchi, Pietro (1961), Rischio e Responsabilità Oggettiva (Risk and Strict Liability), Milano: Giuffrè.
123. Tullock, Gordon (1981), 'Negligence Again', International Review of Law and Economics, 1, 51 ff.
124. Vandall, Frank J. (1983), 'Applying Strict Liability to Professionals: Economic and Legal Analysis', Indiana Law Journal, 59, 25-64.
125. Vandall, Frank J. (1986), 'Judge Posner's Negligence-Efficiency Theory: A Critique', Emory Law Journal, 35, 383-418.
126. van Egteren, Henry and R. Todd Smith (2002), 'Environmental Regulations under SimpleNegligence or Strict Liability', Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 369-96.
127. Versteeg, John C. (1974), 'Strict Liability and Judicial Resources', Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 217-48.
128. Von Hippel, Eike (1978), 'Prevention of Accidents and Compensation of Accident Victims', in Göran Skogh (ed.), Law and Economics. Report from a Symposium in Lund, Lund: Juridiska Föreningen, pp. 211-21.
129. Von Randow, Philipp and Klaus Wehrt (1989), 'Comment: New Technologies, Liability Rules and Adaptive Behaviour', in Michael Faure and Roger Van den Bergh (eds), Essays in Law and Economics. Corporations, Accident Prevention and Compensation for Losses, Antwerpen: Maklu, pp. 107-16.
130. Wetzstein, Michael E. and Terence J. Centner (1992), 'Regulating Agricultural Contamination of Groundwater through Strict Liability and Negligence Legislation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 1-11.
131. White, Michelle J. (1989), 'An Empirical Test of the Comparative and ContributoryNegligence Rules in Accident Law', Rand Journal of Economics, 20, 308-30.
132. Witt, Robert C. and Jorge Urrutia (1983), 'A Comparative Economic Analysis of Tort Liability and No-Fault Compensation Systems in Automobile Insurance', Journal of Risk and Insurance, 50, 631-69.
133. Wittman, Donald A. (1986), 'The Price of Negligence under Differing Liability Rules', Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 151-63.
134. Zwier, Paul J. (1985), 'The Consequentialist/Nonconsequentialist Ethical Distinction: A Tool for the Formal Appraisal of Traditional Negligence and Economic Tort Analysis', Boston College Law Review, 26, 905-44.
135. Baumol, William J. and Wallace E. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. Chateauneuf, Alain, Jürgen Eichberger and Simon Grant (2007), 'Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-additive Capacities', Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 538-67.
137. Coase, Ronald H. (1960), 'The Problem of Social Cost', Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
138. Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe and Hans-Bernd Schäfer (2007), 'The Core of Pure Economic Loss', International Review of Law and Economics, 27, 8-28.
139. Gigerenzer, Gerd (2005), 'Is the Mind Irrational or Ecologically Rational?', in Francesco Parisi and Vernon L. Smith (eds), The Law and Economics of Irrational Behavior, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 37-67.
140. Glaeser, Edward L. and Andrei Shleifer (2003), 'The Rise of the Regulatory State', Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 401-25.
141. Guppy, Andrew (1993), 'Subjective Probability of Accident and Apprehension in Relation to Self -Other Bias, Age, and Reported Behaviour', Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 375-82.
142. Jolls, Christine, Cass R. Sunstein and Richard Thaler (1998), 'A Behavioural Approach to Law and Economics', Stanford Law Review, 50, 1471-550.
143. Keeton, W.P. et al. (1984), Prosser and Keeton on Torts, St Paul: West Publishing Company.
144. Sunstein, Cass R. (1997), 'Behavioral Analysis of Law', University of Chicago Law Review, 64, 1175-95.
145. Weinstein, Neil D. (1989), 'Optimistic Biases about Personal Risks', Science, 246, 1232-3.
146. Zweigert, Konrad and Hein Kötz (1996), Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, Amsterdam: North-Holland.